Utopia and Pluralism: Demanding Too Much in the Name of Justice

Bibliography

• Ashenden, Samantha, and Andreas Hess. “Totalitarianism and Justice: Hannah Arendt’s and Judith N. Shklar’s Political Reflections in Historical and Theoretical Perspective.” Economy and Society 45, nos. 3–4 (2016): 505–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhabib, Seyla. “Judith Shklar’s Dystopic Liberalism.” In Liberalism Without Illusions, edited by Bernard Yack, 55–63. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, Isaiah. Freedom and its Betrayal. 1952. Edited by Henry Hardy. London: Pimlico, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, Isaiah. “Soviet Russian Culture.” In The Soviet Mind, edited by Henry Hardy, 130–65. 1957. Washington, DC: Brookings, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Liberty, edited by Henry Hardy, 166–217. 1958. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, Isaiah, and Bernard Williams. “Pluralism and Liberalism: A Reply.” Political Studies 41 (1994): 306–9.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder, George. Isaiah Berlin: Liberty and Pluralism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder, George. “Value Pluralism vs. Relativism in Bernard Williams’s ‘Relativism of Distance.’” The Pluralist 12, no. 3 (2017): 114–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, Colin. “Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation.” Political Studies 55, no. 4 (2007): 844–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fives, Allyn. Evaluating Parental Power: An Exercise in Pluralist Political Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, Allyn. “The Freedom of Extremists: Pluralist and Non-pluralist Responses to Moral Conflict.” Philosophia (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Fives, Allyn. “Paternalism and Moral Conflict: A Pluralist Analysis of Parental Power.” The Journal of Political Power 11, no. 2 (2018): 151–64.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, Allyn. “Who Gets to Decide? Children’s Competence, Parental Authority, and Informed Consent.” In Justice, Education and the Politics of Childhood: Challenges and Perspectives, edited by J. Drerup, G. Schweiger, G. Graf, and C. Schickhardt, 35–47. Springer, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, Allyn. “Working from Both Ends: The Dual Role of Philosophy in Research Ethics. In Philosophy and Political Engagement, edited by Allyn Fives and Keith Breen, 161–84. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, Katrina. “Hope and Memory in the Thought of Judith Shklar.” Modern Intellectual History 8, no. 3 (2011): 591–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, Katrina. “Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and Political Realism.” European Journal of Political Theory 11, no. 3 (2012): 247–72.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, William, A. The Practice of Liberal Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, William A. “Realism in Political Theory.” European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 385–411.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, Gerald. The Tyranny of the Ideal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, John. Isaiah Berlin: An Interpretation of His Thought. 2d ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Edward. “Contingency, Confidence, and Liberalism in the Political Thought of Bernard Williams.” Social Theory and Practice 40, no. 4 (2014): 545–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Edward, and Matt Sleat. “Ethics, Morality and the Case for Realist Political Theory.” CRISPP 20, no. 3 (2017): 278–95.
   Google Scholar
• Jubb, Robert. “Playing Kant at the Court of King Arthur.” Political Studies 63 (2015): 919–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kekes, John. “Cruelty and Liberalism.” Ethics 106 (July 1996): 834–44.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, Shefali. “Doubt and Commitment: Justice and Skepticism in Judith Shklar’s Thought.” European Journal of Political Theory 15, no. 1 (2016): 77–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyn, Samuel. “Judith Shklar on the Philosophy of International Criminal Law.” International Criminal Law Review 14 (2014): 717–37.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, Thomas. Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, Thomas. “The Fragmentation of Value.” In Mortal Questions, 128–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Philp, Mark. “Realism Without Illusions.” Political Theory 40, no. 5 (2012): 629–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, Nancy L. “The Democracy of Everyday Life.” In Liberalism Without Illusions, edited by Bernard Yack, 25–44. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Émile. 1762. Translated by Barbara Foxley. London: Dent, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. 1762. Translated by Maurice Cranston. London: Penguin, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Sagar, Paul. “From Scepticism to Liberalism?” Political Studies 62, no. 2 (2016): 368–84.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. After Utopia: The Decline of Political Faith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. The Faces of Injustice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. “The Liberalism of Fear.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, edited by Nancy Rosenblum, 21–38. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau’s Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. Montesquieu. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. “Nineteen Eighty-Four: Should Political Theory Care?” In Political Thought and Political Thinkers, edited by Stanley Hoffmann, 339–52. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. “The Political Theory of Utopia: From Melancholy to Nostalgia.” 1965. In Political Thought and Political Thinkers, edited by Stanley Hoffmann, 161–74. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. “Putting Cruelty First.” 1982. Democratiya 4 (Spring 2006): 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. “Rousseau’s Images of Authority.” The American Political Science Review 58, no. 4 (1964): 919–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. “What is the Use of Utopia?” In Political Thought and Political Thinkers, edited by Stanley Hoffmann, 175–90. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, Mathias. “Hope Abjuring Hope: On the Place of Utopia in Realist Political Theory.” Political Theory (2017): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591717740324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside, Kerry H. “Justice Uncertain: Judith Shklar on Liberalism, Skepticism, and Equality.” Polity 31, no. 3 (1999): 501–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Bernard. “Ethical Consistency.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 39 (suppl.) (1965): 103–24.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Bernard. In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Edited by Geoffrey Hawthorn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar