Moderation as Government: Montesquieu and the Divisibility of Power

Bibliography

• Althusser, Louis. Politics and History. London: Verso, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bagehot, Walter. The English Constitution. 1867. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, Isaiah. Liberty. Edited by Henry Hardy. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Carrese, Paul. O. Democracy in Moderation: Montesquieu, Tocqueville and Sustainable Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Carrithers, David M., Michal A. Mosher, and Paul A. Rahe, eds. Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of the Laws. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cheeseman, Nick, and B. Klaas. How to Rig an Election. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero. On Duties. 44 BCE. Cambridge: Loeb, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Craiutu, Aurelian. A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Craiutu, Aurelian. Faces of Moderation: The Art of Balance in an Age of Extremes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon. Making Sense of Social Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon. Securities Against Misrule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgini, Giovanni. “Cicero and Machiavelli: Two Visions of Statesmanship and Two Educational Projects Compared.” Ethics and Politics 16, no. 2 (2014): 506–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Alexander, John Madison, and James Jay. The Federalist. 1788. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, Russell. “Liberal Distrust.” European Review 10, no. 1 (2002): 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hennis, Wilhelm. “The Idea of Office and the Concept of Democracy.” In Politics as a Practical Science. Translated by K. Tribe. London: Macmillan, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Albert O. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. “Of the Independency of Parliament.” In Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. “Whether the British government inclines more towards absolute monarchy, or a republic.” In Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Jaucourt, Louis. “Crainte.” In Encylcopédie, tome 4, 428–29, 1751.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, John. The New Despotism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Koebner, Richard. “Despot and Despotism: Vicissitudes of a Political Term.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 14 (1951): 275–302.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Sharon R. “Despotism in The Spirit of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics, edited by David M. Carrithers, Michal A. Mosher, and Paul A. Rahe, 231–271. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, Noel. Useful Enemies: Islam and the Ottoman Empire in Western Political Thought, 1450–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Manent, Pierre. An Intellectual History of Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Mithen, Nicholas. “Politics as Moderation in Machiavelli.” History of Political Thought 43, no. 1 (2022): 31–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montaigne, Michel de. Complete Essays. Translated by M. A. Screech. London: Penguin, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Montesquieu. Oeuvres Complètes, Tome 2. Paris: Pléiade PUF/Gallimard, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Montesquieu. Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and their Decline. 1734. Translated by David Lowenthal. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Montesquieu. The Persian Letters. 1721. Translated by C. J. Betts. London: Penguin, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Montesquieu. The Spirit of the Laws. 1748. Translated by Anne M. Cohler, Basia C. Miller, and Harold Stone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Montesquieu. My Thoughts. Edited and translated by Henry C. Clark. Minneapolis, MIN: Liberty Fund, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Thomas. “Machiavelli and the Liberalism of Fear.” History of the Human Sciences 30, no. 5 (2017): 68–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Thomas. “Civil Society, Populism and Liberalism.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 34, no. 2 (2021): 175–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Thomas. “Power Degree Zero: Montesquieu, Tocqueville, Despotism.” Journal of Political Power 15, no. 2 (2022): 243–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhammel, Jurgen. Unfabling the East: The Enlightenment’s Encounter with Asia. Translated by R. Savage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. “On the Theory of Democracy.” In All Life is Problem-Solving. London: Routledge, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rahe, Paul. Soft Despotism, Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville and the Modern Prospect. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Melvin. “Despotism.” In Dictionary of the History of Ideas, Volume 2, edited by P. P. Weiner. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, Nancy, ed. Liberalism and the Moral Life. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Carl. Dictatorship. London: Verso, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton, Robert. Montesquieu: A Critical Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton, Robert. Essays on Montesquieu and the Enlightenment. Paris: Voltaire Foundation, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith. Montesquieu. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith. “The Liberalism of Fear.” 1989. In Political Thought and Political Thinkers, edited by S. Hoffmann, 3–20. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, A. “Réflexions sur une métaphore: le sérail dans les Lettres Persanes.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 185 (1980): 181–98.
   Google Scholar
• Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. 1835–40. Translated by A. Goldhammer. New York: Library of America, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Venturi, Franco. “Oriental Despotism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 24, no. 1 (1963): 133–42.
   Google Scholar
• Voltaire. Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, Jeremy. Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael. “On Negative Politics.” In Liberalism Without Illusions, edited by B. Yack. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Wolin, Sheldon. Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar