Valuing Diversity Without Illusions: The Anti-Utopian Agonism of Karl Popper’s The Open Society and Its Enemies

Bibliography

• Afisi, Oseni, ed. Karl Popper and Africa: Knowledge, Politics and Development. New York: Springer, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Applebaum, Anne. Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism. New York: Anchor Books, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, Henri. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. 1932. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, Alain. “Is an Open Society a Just Society? Popper and Rawls.” Learning for Democracy 1, no. 2 (2005): 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Burckhardt, Jacob. The Greeks and Greek Civilization. Edited by Oswyn Murray. Translated by Sheila Stern. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Edyvane, Derek. “Justice as Conflict: The Question of Stuart Hampshire.” Contemporary Political Theory 7, no. 3 (2008): 317–40.
   Google Scholar
• Eidlin, Fred. “The Radical, Revolutionary Strain in Popper’s Social and Political Theory.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 42, no. 3 (1985): 283–98.
   Google Scholar
• Eidlin, Fred. Popper and Democratic Theory. 1993. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1965227 (accessed 2 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Emberley, Peter, and Barry Cooper, eds. Faith and Political Philosophy: The Correspondence between Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin, 1934–1964. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Embry, Charles, and Glenn Hughes, eds. The Eric Voegelin Reader: Politics, History, Consciousness. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, Katrina. “Tocqueville Anticipated Me.” London Review of Books, April 26, 2012. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v34/n08/katrina-forrester/tocqueville-anticipated-me.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, Francis. “The End of History?” The National Interest 16 (1989): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, Steve. Governance of Science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, Ernst. “Karl Popper: The Thinker and the Man.” In The Significance of Popper’s Thought. Proceedings of the Conference on Karl Popper: 1902–1994, edited by S. Amsterdamski, 75–83. Leiden: Rodopi, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, Bonnie. “The Optimistic Agonist: An Interview with Bonnie Honig.” Opendemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/optimistic-agonist-interview-with-bonnie-honig/ (accessed 14 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Honig, Bonnie. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatieff, Michael, and Stefan Roch, eds. Rethinking Open Society: New Adversaries and New Opportunities. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvie, Ian, and Sandra Pralong, eds. Popper’s Open Society After 50 Years. London: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, Paul. “Nietzsche, Agonistic Politics, and Spiritual Enmity.” Political Research Quarterly 73, no. 1 (2020): 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knops, Andrew. “Agonism as Deliberation: On Mouffe’s Theory of Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 15, no. 1 (2007): 115–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landemore, Hélène. Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lilla, Mark. “Open Society as an Oxymoron: A Conversation between Mark Lilla and Michael Ignatieff.” In Rethinking Open Society, edited by Michael Ignatieff and Stefan Roch, 19–30. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lilla, Mark. “Über Identitätspolitik.” In Wenn Demokratien Demokratisch Untergehen, edited by L. Hagedorn, S. Randeira, and K. Hasewend, 136–48. Vienna: Passagen Verlag, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• McCrum, Robert. “The 100 Best Nonfiction Books: No 35—The Open Society and Its Enemies, by Karl Popper (1945).” The Guardian, Books, September 26, 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/sep/26/100-best-nonfiction-books-karl-popper-open-society-its-enemies.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. “ Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism.” https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_72.pdf, 2000 (accessed 28 November 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. On the Political. London: Routledge, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Jan-Werner. “Die Offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde neu gelesen.” Transit 30, no. 1 (2005):156–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Knopf Doubleday, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Notturno, Mark. Science and the Open Society: The Future of Karl Popper’s Philosophy. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Notturno, Mark. Hayek and Popper: On Rationality, Economism, and Democracy. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pickel, Andreas. “Never Ask Who Should Rule: Karl Popper and Political Theory.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique 22, no. 1 (1989): 83–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. “Utopia and Violence.” World Affairs 149, no. 1 (1989): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. 1962. London: Psychology Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. The Poverty of Historicism. 1957. London: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Pralong, Sandra. “Minima Moralia: Is There an Ethics of the Open Society?” In Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper, by Kark Popper, edited by I. C. Jarvie and Sandra Pralong. London: Routledge, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Roch, Stefan, “Educating Skeptical but Passionate Citizens: The Open Society Ideal as a University Mission.” In Rethinking Open Society, edited by Michael Ignatieff and Stefan Roch, 47–64. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Abraham, and Paul Stone. “ Review of The Cambridge Companion to Popper.” https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/trial-3/ (accessed 7 July 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Salamun, Kurt. Ein Jahrhundertdenker: Karl Popper und die Offene Gesellschaft. Vienna: Molden Verlag, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Sassower, Raphael, and Nathaniel Laor, eds. The Impact of Critical Rationalism: Expanding the Popperian Legacy through the Works of Ian C. Jarvie. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, Jeremy. The Political Thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, Jeremy, and Geoffrey Stokes, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shklar, Judith N. Political Thought and Political Thinkers. Edited by Stanley Hoffmann. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Jason. How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. London: Penguin, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Stelzer, Harald. “Principles and Policies: What Can We Learn from Popper’s ‘Piecemeal Social Engineering’ for Ideal and Nonideal Theory?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46, no. 4 (2016): 375–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, Geoffrey. “Popper and Habermas: Convergent Arguments for a Postmetaphysical Universalism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Popper, edited by Geoffrey Stokes and Jeremy Shearmur, 318–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Talisse, Robert. Sustaining Democracy: What We Owe to the Other Side. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Rod. “‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society.” Critical Rationalism Blog, March 28, 2017. https://www.criticalrationalism.net/2017/03/28/brexit-political-ideals-open-society/.
   Google Scholar
• Thrasher, John. “Agreeing to Disagree: Diversity, Political Contractualism, and the Open Society.” The Journal of Politics 82, no. 3 (2020): 1142–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, James. “The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy.” The Modern Law Review 65, no. 2 (2002): 204–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, James. “‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ in Context.” In Isaiah Berlin and the Politics of Freedom: ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ 50 Years Later, edited by B. Baum and R. Nichols, 23–51. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, Andrew. “Nationalism and the Open Society.” Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 107 (2005): 36–64.
   Google Scholar
• Wenman, Mark. Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar