Examining the functions of women’s violence: Accommodation, resistance, and enforcement of gender inequality

References

• Allen, N., Wolf, A., Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. (2003). Diversity of children's immediate coping responses to witnessing domestic violence. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 3(1–2), 123.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A., & Gordon, N. (2018). Traditional gender roles: Social and cultural influences on oppression and resistance. In J. Nadler & M.R. Lowery (Eds.), The war on women in the United States: Beliefs, tactics, and the best defenses (pp. 3–21). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A., & Sichel, C. E. (2014). Structural competency as a framework for training in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(7), 901. doi:10.1177/0011000014550320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anyon, J. (1983). Intersections of gender and class: Accommodation and resistance by working-class and affluent females to contradictory sex-role ideologies. In S. Walker., & L. Barton (Eds.), Gender, class and education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, J., Miller, S., & Siard, C. (2003). Toward a typology of abusive women: Differences between partner-only and generally violent women in the use of violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27 (2), 153. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair-Merritt, M., Crowne, S., Thompson, D., Sibinga, E., Trent, M., & Campbell, J. (2010). Why do women use intimate partner violence? A systematic review of women’s motivations. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 11 (4), 178. doi:10.1177/1524838010379003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belknap, J. (2015). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The Biological Model of Human Development. In W. Damon., & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (6th ed., pp. 793–828). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calogero, R. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24 (3), 312. doi:10.1177/0956797612452574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N., & Hanks, R. (2013). “Everything I’ve done I’ve done for men”: One woman’s deployment of femininities and her pathway to crime. Sociological Spectrum, 33 (5), 433. doi:10.1080/02732173.2013.818507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M. (2006). Patriarchy, crime, and justice feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1 (1), 6. doi:10.1177/1557085105282893
   Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2013). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coccaro, E., Berman, M., & Kavoussi, R. (1997). Assessment of life history of aggression: Development and psychometric characteristics. Psychiatry Research, 73 (3), 147. doi:10.1016/S0165-1781(97)00119-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (1994). Women and violence: Realities and responses worldwide. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62 (1), 107. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), 777. doi:10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C., Rogers, A., & Tolman, D. (2014). Women, girls and psychotherapy: Reframing resistance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56 (2), 109. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.56.2.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women an integrated, ecological framework. Violence against Women, 4 (3), 262. doi:10.1177/1077801298004003002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hennes, E., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30 (6), 669. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Knox, S., Thompson, B., Williams, E., Hess, S., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52 (2), 196. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschel, D., & Deveau, L. (2017). The impact of primary aggressor laws on single versus dual arrest in incidents of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 23 (10), 1155–1176. doi:10.1177/1077801216657898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting ‘patriarchy’ as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15 (5), 553. doi:10.1177/1077801208331246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javdani, S. (2011). Contextualized pathways through women’s use of violence: A mixed methods study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Javdani, S. (2013). Gender matters: Using an ecological lens to understand female crime and disruptive behavior. In B. Russel (Ed.), Perceptions of Female Offenders (pp. 9). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Javdani, S., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2011a). Expanding our lens: Female pathways to antisocial behavior in adolescence and adulthood. Clinical Psychology Review, 31 (8), 1324. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javdani, S., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2011b). Gendered social forces: A review of the impact of institutionalized factors on women and girls' criminal justice trajectories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17 (2), 161. doi:10.1037/a0021957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (4), 948. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00948.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. (2009). Between good and ghetto: African American girls and inner-city violence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2 (1), 171. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00056.x
   Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, D. (1998). Gender, power and contestation: “Bargaining with patriarchy” revisited. InC. Jackson., & R. Pearson (Eds.), Feminist Visions of Development (pp. 135). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrner, A., & Allen, N. E. (2014). Construct validity of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A mixed-method investigation of women’s intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 4 (4), 477. doi:10.1037/a0037404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrner, A., & Allen, N. E. (2009). Still a movement after all these years? Current tensions in the domestic violence movement. Violence Against Women, 15 (6), 656. doi:10.1177/1077801209332185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2008). Getting played: African American girls, urban inequality, and gendered violence. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirón, L. F., & Lauria, M. (1998). Student voice as agency: Resistance and accommodation in inner-city schools. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29(2), 189–213.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, A. (1988). Community psychology and feminism: Tensions and commonalities. Journal of Community Psychology, 16 (1), 70. doi:10.1002/1520-6629(198801)16:1<70::AID-JCOP2290160109>3.0.CO;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, J., & Neal, Z. (2011). Power as a structural phenomenon. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48 (3–4), 157. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9356-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhrn, E. (1998). Gender and power in school: On girls' open resistance. Social Psychology of Education, 1 (4), 341. doi:10.1007/BF02335553
   Google Scholar
• Prilleltensky, I. (2003). Understanding, resisting, and overcoming oppression: Toward psychopolitical validity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31 (1–2), 195. doi:10.1023/A:1023043108210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rew, M., Gangoli, G., & Gill, A. K. (2013). Violence between female in-laws in India. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 14 (1), 147.
   Google Scholar
• Richie, B. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riger, S. (2001). Transforming community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29 (1), 69. doi:10.1023/A:1005293228252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, W. (1976). Blaming the victim. New York, NY: Vintage Books, Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, C. (1982). Needed concepts in the study of gender identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6 (4), 375. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1982.tb01067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasco, S., & Bond, M. (2010). The treatment of gender in community psychology research. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Way, N. (2011). Deep secrets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wesely, J. (2006). Considering the context of women’s violence: Gender, lived experiences, and cumulative victimization. Feminist Criminology, 1 (4), 303. doi:10.1177/1557085106293074
   Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1 (2), 125. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz, R. (2001). Women and their hair: Seeking power through resistance and accommodation. Gender & Society, 15(5), 667–686.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128 (5), 699. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.5.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar