Bidding Behavior in Dutch Auctions: Insights from a Structured Literature Review

References

• Abbink, K.; Irlenbusch, B.; Pezanis-Christou, P.; Rockenbach, B.; Sadrieh, A.; and Selten, R. An experimental test of design alternatives for the British 3G/UMTS auction. European Economic Review, 49, 2 (2005), 505–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABS. Association of Business Schhols. Academic Journal Guide 2015.
   Google Scholar
• ACPHIS. Australian Council of Professors and Heads of Information Systems. Recommended IS Conferences 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, M.T.P.; Astor, P.J.; and Krämer, J. Affective images, emotion regulation and bidding behavior: An experiment on the influence of competition and community emotions in Internet auctions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 35, 1 (2016), 56–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, M.T.P.; Gamer, M.; Krämer, J.; and Weinhardt, C. Measuring emotions in electronic markets. In ICIS 2011 Proceedings. Shanghai, China, 2011, pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, M.T.P.; Hagenau, M.; Neumann, D.; and Weinhardt, C. Emotions in electronic auctions: A physio-economic approach on information systems. In ECIS 2008 Proceedings. Galway, Ireland, 2008, pp. 315–325.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, M.T.P.; Krämer, J.; and Müller, M.B. Auction fever! How time pressure and social competition affect bidders’ arousal and bids in retail auctions. Journal of Retailing, 91, 3 (2015), 468–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, M.T.P.; Krämer, J.; and Weinhardt, C. Excitement up! Price down! Measuring emotions in Dutch auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 2 (2012), 7–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, A.I. Is the Dutch auction IPO a good idea? Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance, 11, 2 (2006), 233–260.
   Google Scholar
• Anandalingam, G.; Day, R.W.; and Raghavan, S. The landscape of electronic market design. Management Science, 51, 3 (2005), 316–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquafind.com. Fish market auction sources. Aquafind: Aquatic Fish Database, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter, O. How auctions work for wine and art. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 3 (1989), 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, K., and Zender, J.F. Auctions of divisible goods: On the rationale for the treasury experiment. Review of Financial Studies, 6, 4 (1993), 733–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagwell, L.S. Dutch auction repurchases: An analysis of shareholder heterogeneity. Journal of Finance, 47, 1 (1992), 71–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D.E., and Starr, D. Filene’s Basement. Harvard Business School Case, 9-594–18, (1993), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, G.J.; van Ours, J.C.; and Pradhan, M.P. The declining price anomaly in Dutch rose auctions. American Economic Review, 91, 4 (2001), 1055–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J.; Dickhaut, J.; and McCabe, K. Risk preference instability across institutions: A dilemma. PNAS, 102, 11 (2005), 4209–4214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binmore, K., and Klemperer, P. The biggest auction ever: The sale of the British 3G telecom licences. Economic Journal, 112, 478 (2002), C74-C96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A.L.; Plott, C.R.; and Sullivan, H.J. Collusion facilitating and collusion breaking power of simultaneous ascending and descending price auctions. Economic Inquiry, 47, 3 (2009), 395–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J.; Gjerstad, S.; and Porter, D. Information effects in uniform price multi-unit Dutch auctions. Southern Economic Journal, 83, 1 (2016), 126–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carare, O., and Rothkopf, M. Slow Dutch auctions. Management Science, 51, 3 (2005), 365–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassady, R. Auctions and Auctioneering. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Cheema, A.; Chakravarti, D.; and Sinha, A.R. Bidding behavior in descending and ascending auctions. Marketing Science, 31, 5 (2012), 779–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, E. Going Dutch: The Google IPO. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 20, 1 (2005), 405–441.
   Google Scholar
• Coppinger, V.M.; Smith, V.L.; and Titus, J.A. Incentives and behavior in English, Dutch and sealed-bid auctions. Economic Inquiry, 18, 1 (1980), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J.C., and James, D. Clocks and trees: Isomorphic Dutch auctions and centipede games. Econometrica, 80, 2 (2012), 883–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J.C.; Roberson, B.; and Smith, V.L. Theory and behavior of single object auctions. Research in Experimental Economics, 2 (1982), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J.C.; Smith, V.L.; and Walker, J.M. A test that discriminates between two models of the Dutch-first auction non-isomorphism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 2–3 (1983), 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J.C.; Smith, V.L.; and Walker, J.M. Theory and individual behavior in first-price auctions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 1 (1988), 61–99.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, V.P., and Kuo, P.-S. A dual Dutch auction in Taipei: The choice of numeraire and auction form in multi-object auctions with bundling. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51 (2003), 427–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D.D., and Holt, C.A. Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Deck, C.A.; Lee, J.; and Reyes, J. Are subjects making financial decisions in lab auctions or are they just gambling. Applied Economics Letters, 22, 3 (2015), 228–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deck, C.A., and Wilson, B.J. Auction markets for evaluations. Southern Economic Journal, 72, 1 (2005), 42–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deck, C.A., and Wilson, B.J. Fixed revenue auctions: Theory and behavior. Economic Inquiry, 46, 3 (2007), 342–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., and Katok, E. E-sourcing in procurement: Theory and behavior in reverse auctions with noncompetitive contracts. Management Science, 52, 4 (2006), 581–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Février, P.; Linnemer, L.; and Visser, M. Buy or wait, that is the option: The buyer’s option in sequential laboratory auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 38, 1 (2007), 98–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frahm, D.G., and Schrader, L.F. An experimental comparison of pricing in two auction systems. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52, 4 (1970), 528–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulioni, G., and Bucciarelli, E. Agent’s behaviour in a sequential Dutch auction: Evidence from the Pescara wholesale fish market. Applied Economics Letters, 18, 5 (2011), 455–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan, A.; Adam, M.T.P.; Teubner, T.; and Weinhardt, C. Think, feel, bid: The impact of environmental conditions on the role of bidders’ cognitive and affective processes in auction bidding. Electronic Markets (2016), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanein, K., and Head, M. The impact of infusing social presence in the Web interface: An investigation across product types. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10, 2 (2005), 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heck, E., and Ribbers, P. Experiences with electronic auctions in the Dutch flower industry. Electronic Markets, 7, 4 (1997), 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. Retailers, knowledges and changing commodity networks: The case of the cut flower trade. Geoforum, 31, 2 (2000), 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagel, J.H. Auctions: A survey of experimental research. In J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 501–585.
   Google Scholar
• Kagel, J.H., and Levin, D. The winner’s curse and public information. American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 894–920.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D.; Knetsch, J.L.; and Thaler, R.H. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 6 (1990), 1325–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, P.K., and Kopalle, P.K. Dynamic pricing on the Internet: Importance and implications for consumer behavior. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5, 3 (2001), 63–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, I.M. Seafood auctions, market equity and the buying and selling of fish: Lessons on co-management from New England and the Spanish Mediterranean. Marine Policy, 24, 2 (2000), 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katok, E., and Kwasnica, A.M. Time is money: The effect of clock speed on seller’s revenue in Dutch auctions. Experimental Economics, 11, 4 (2008), 344–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katok, E., and Roth, A.E. Auctions of homogeneous goods with increasing returns: Experimental comparison of alternative “Dutch” auctions. Management Science, 50, 8 (2004), 1044–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskinocak, P., and Tayur, S. Quantitative analysis for Internet-enabled supply chains. Interfaces, 31, 2 (2001), 70–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemperer, P. Auctions with almost common values: The “Wallet Game” and its applications. European Economic Review, 42, 3–5 (1998), 757–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemperer, P. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13, 3 (1999), 227–286.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, G.; Malhotra, D.; and Murnighan, J.K. Towards a competitive arousal model of decision-making: A study of auction fever in live and Internet auctions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 2 (2005), 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazear, E.P. Retail pricing and clearance sales. American Economic Review, 76, 1 (1986), 14–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D.; Peck, J.; and Ivanov, A. Separating Bayesian updating from non-probabilistic reasoning: An experimental investigation. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 8, 2 (2016), 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y.; Gupta, A.; Ketter, W.; and van Heck, E. Designing intelligent software agents for B2B sequential dutch auctions: A structural econometric approach. In ICIS 2013 Proceedings. Milan, Italy, 2013, pp. 1073–1089.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y.; Gupta, A.; Ketter, W.; and van Heck, E. Information transparency in multi-channel B2B auctions: A field experiment. In ICIS 2014 Proceedings. Auckland, New Zealand, 2014, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley, D. Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the Internet. American Economic Review, 89, 5 (1999), 1063–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Marchi, N., and van Miegroet, H. Art, value and market practices in the Netherlands in the seventeenth century. Art Bulletin, 76, 3 (1994), 451–464.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, R.P., and McMillan, J. Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 2 (1987), 699–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee, R.P., and Vincent, D. The declining price anomaly. Journal of Economic Theory, 60, 1 (1993), 191–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, K.A.; Rassenti, S.J.; and Smith, V.L. Auction institutional design: Theory and behavior of simultaneous multiple-unit generalizations. American Economic Review, 80, 5 (1990), 1276–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P. Auctions and bidding: A primer. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 3 (1989), 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthitacharoen, A., and Tams, S. The role of auction duration in bidder strategies and auction prices. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 21, 1 (2017), 71–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugebauer, T., and Pezanis-Christou, P. Bidding behavior at sequential first-price auctions with(out) supply uncertainty: A laboratory analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 63, 1 (2007), 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S.; Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A.; and Klein, M. Auctions and bidding. ACM Computing Surveys, 43, 2 (2011), 1–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, X., and Zhang, F. Using clock auctions to dissolve partnership: An experimental study. Economics Letters, 119, 1 (2013), 55–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S., and Noy, A. Social presence: Influence on bidders in Internet auctions. Electronic Markets, 15, 2 (2005), 158–175.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., and Smith, P.L. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 2 (2004), 333–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbett, A.; Graham, M.K.; and Matthews, P.H. Revenue implications of strategic and external auction risk. Games, 6, 5 (2016), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.W. Auctions: The Social Construction of Value. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., and Dickhaut, J. Economics and emotion: Institutions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 2 (2005), 316–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V.L. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review, 66, 2 (1976), 274–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V.L. Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review, 72, 5 (1982), 923–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teubner, T.; Adam, M.T.P.; and Riordan, R. The impact of computerized agents on immediate emotions, overall arousal and bidding behavior in electronic auctions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 10 (2015), 838–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turocy, T.L.; Watson, E.; and Battalio, R.C. Framing the first-price auction. Experimental Economics, 10, 1 (2007), 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickrey, W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 1 (1961), 8–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vragov, R.; Shang, R.D.; and Lang, K.R. On-line auctions with buy-it-now pricing: A practical design model and experimental evaluation. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14, 4 (2010), 39–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., and Watson, R.T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26, 2 (2002), xiii–xxiii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, A.M.; Parente, M.L.; and Porter, D. Seller beware: Supply and demand reduction and price manipulation in multiple-unit uniform price auctions. Southern Economic Journal, 82, 3 (2016), 760–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar