1,061
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

More Personalized, More Useful? Reinvestigating Recommendation Mechanisms in E-Commerce

&

References

  • Adomavicius, G.; Bockstedt, J. C.; Curley, S. P.; and Zhang, J. Effects of online recommendations on consumers’ willingness to pay. Information Systems Research, 29, 1 (2018), 84–102.
  • Alonso, B. What Is 1 to 1 Personalization? 2020. https://kibocommerce.com/blog/what-is-1-to-1-personalization ( accessed March 2021).
  • Anand, P.; and Sternthal, B. Strategies for designing persuasive messages: Deductions from the resource matching hypothesis. In P. Cafferata and A. M. Tybout (eds.), Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989, pp. 135–159.
  • Arora, N.; Dreze, X.; Ghose, A.; Hess, J. D.; Iyengar, R.; Jing, B.; Joshi, Y.; Kumar, V.; Lurie, N.; Neslin, S.; Sajeesh, S.; Su, M.; Syam, N.; Thomas, J.; and Zhang, Z. J. Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice. Marketing Letters, 19, 3 (2008), 305–321.
  • Babbie, E. The Basics of Social Research (3rd ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2005.
  • Berg-Scholsser, D.; and De Meur, G. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. In B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin (eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009, pp. 1–18.
  • Bettman, J.; Luce, M.; and Payne, J. Constructive consumer choice process. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 3 (1998), 187–217.
  • Bodoff, D.; and Ho, S. Y. Effectiveness of website personalization: Does the presence of personalized recommendations cannibalize sampling of other items? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 2 (2015), 208–235.
  • Campbell, J. T.; Sirmon, D.G.; and Schijven, M. Fuzzy logic and the market: A configurational approach to investor perceptions of acquisition announcements. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1 (2016), 163–187.
  • Campbell, D. J. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 1 (1988), 40–52.
  • Cao, M.; Hu, Q.; Kiang, M.Y.; and Hong, H. A portfolio strategy design for human–computer negotiations in e-retail. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 3 (2020), 305–337.
  • Choi, J.; Lee, H. J.; and Kim, Y. C. The influence of social presence on customer intention to reuse online recommender systems: The roles of personalization and product type. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 1 (2011), 129–154.
  • Cizner, G. Using Dynamic Product Recommendations in Order to Increase Sales. 2017. https://www.invespcro.com/blog/using-dynamic-product-recommendations-in-order-to-increase-sales (accessed March 2021).
  • Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (1989), 319–340.
  • Dawson, G. S.; Denford, J. S.; Williams, C. K.; Preston, D.; and Desouza, K. C. An examination of effective IT governance in the public sector using the legal view of agency theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 4 (2016), 1180–1208.
  • Duşa, A. QCA with R: A Comprehensive Resource. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2019.
  • El-Sawy, O. A.; Malhotra, A.; Park, Y.; and Pavlou, P. A. Seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: It takes three to tango. Information Systems Research, 21, 4 (2010), 835–848.
  • Fiss, P. C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 2 (2011), 393–420.
  • Fitzsimons, G. J.; and Lehmann, D. R. Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Science, 23, 1 (2004), 82–94.
  • Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; and Straub, D. W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 1 (2003), 51–90.
  • Ghasemaghaei, M.; Hassanein, K.; and Benbasat, I. Assessing the design choices for online recommendation agents for older adults: Older does not always mean simpler information technology. MIS Quarterly, 43, 1 (2019), 329–346.
  • Goldstein, E. B. Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research, and Everyday Experience. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2018.
  • Greckhamer, T.; Misangyi, V.; Elms, H.; and Lacey, R. Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 4 (2008), 695–726.
  • Gretzel, U.; and Fesenmaier, D. R. Persuasion in recommender systems. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11, 2 (2006), 81–100.
  • Henderick, K. 5 Steps to Move Closer to One-to-One Personalization. 2019. https://marketingland.com/5-steps-to-move-closer-to-one-to-one-personalization-260802 (accessed March 2021).
  • Hewett, K.; Rand, W.; Rust, R. T.; and van Heerde, H. J. Brand buzz in the echoverse. Journal of Marketing, 80, 3 (2016), 1–24.
  • Ho, S. Y.; and Bodoff, D. The effects of web personalization on user attitude and behavior: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and consumer research theory. MIS Quarterly, 38, 2 (2014), 497–520.
  • Hsieh, J.-K., and Li, Y.-J. Will you ever trust the review website again? The importance of source credibility. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 2 (2020), 255–275.
  • Hsu, P.; Nguyen, T. K.; and Huang, J. Value co-creation and co-destruction in self-service technology: A customer’s perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 46, 101029 (2021).
  • Hu, X.; Chen, X.; and Davison, R. M. Social support, source credibility, social influence, and impulsive purchase behavior in social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23, 3 (2019), 297–327.
  • Kiang, M.; Raghu, T. S.; and Shang, K. H-M. Marketing on the Internet—Who can benefit from an online marketing approach?. Decision Support Systems, 27, 4 (2000), 383–393.
  • Kline, B.; and Wagner, J. Information sources and retail buyer decision-making: The effect of product-specific buying experience. Journal of Retailing, 70, 1 (1994), 75–88.
  • Komiak, S. Y. X.; and Benbasat, I. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30, 4 (2006), 941–960.
  • Lee, K. C.; and Kwon, S. Online shopping recommendation mechanism and its influence on consumer decisions and behaviors: A causal map approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 4 (2007), 1567–1574.
  • Lee, Y.; and Benbasat, I. Research note: The influence of trade-off difficulty caused by preference elicitation methods on user acceptance of recommendation agents across loss and gain conditions. Information Systems Research, 22, 4 (2011), 867–884.
  • Li, T.; and Unger, T. Willing to pay for quality personalization? Trade-off between quality and privacy. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 6 (2012), 621–642.
  • Liang, T.-P.; Chen, H.-Y.; Du, T.; Turban, E.; and Li, Y. Effect of personalization on the perceived usefulness of online customer services: A dual-core theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13, 4 (2012), 275–288.
  • Liu, Y.; Mezei, J.; Kostakos, V.; and Li, H. Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioural research: A methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities. Information Systems Journal, 27, 1 (2015), 59–89.
  • Maaya, L.; Meulders, M.; and Vandebroek, M. Online consumers’ attribute non-attendance behavior: Effects of information provision. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 3 (2020), 338–365.
  • Maier, E. The negative effect of product image inconsistency on product overviews during the online product search. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23, 1 (2019), 110–143.
  • Marketing Glossary. Mailchimp. https://mailchimp.com/marketing-glossary/personalized-product-recommendations ( accessed March 2021).
  • Mantel, S. P.; and Kellaris, J. J. Cognitive determinants of consumers’ time perceptions: The impact of resources required and available. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 4 (2003), 531–538.
  • Amazon Is Replacing Product Suggestions With Ads. MarketPlacePulse. 2020. https://www.marketplacepulse.com/articles/amazon-is-replacing-product-suggestions-with-ads (accessed March 2021).
  • Marx, A.; and Dusa, A. Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA), Contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification. Methodological Innovations Online, 6, 2 (2011), 103–148.
  • 40 Product Recommendation Examples That Transform the Ecommerce Experience. Nosto. 2020. https://www.nosto.com/blog/product-recommendations-examples (accessed March 2021).
  • Oana, I. E.; Schneider, C. Q.; and Thomann, E. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) Using R: A Gentle Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
  • Park, J.; and Stoel, L. Effect of brand familiarity, experience and information on online apparel purchase. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33, 2 (2005), 148–160.
  • Park, Y.; and Gretzel, U. Influence of consumers’ online decision-making style on comparison shopping proneness and perceived usefulness of comparison shopping tools. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11, 4 (2010), 342–354.
  • Park, Y.; El Sawy, O. A.; and Fiss, P. The role of business intelligence and communication technologies in organizational agility: A configurational approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18, 9 (2017), 648–686.
  • Park, Y. K.; and Mithas, S. Organized Complexity of Digital Business Strategy: A Configurational Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 44, 1 (2020), 85–127.
  • Pavlou, P. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 3 (2003), 101–134.
  • Peracchio, L. A.; and Meyers-Levy, J. Evaluating persuasion-enhancing techniques from a resource-matching perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 2 (1997), 178–191.
  • Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought. Personyze. https://www.personyze.com/customers-who-bought-this-item-also-bought-recommendation-algorithm ( accessed March 2021).
  • Ragin, C. C. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
  • Ragin, C. C. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
  • Amazon Recommendations. Rejoiner. https://rejoiner.com/resources/amazon-recommendations-secret-selling-online ( accessed March 2021).
  • Schneider, C. Q.; and Wagemann, C. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  • Sivakumaran, E. 6 Ways to Make One-to-Many Feel Like One-to-One in Customer Success. 2018. https://blog.userlane.com/6-ways-to-make-one-to-many-feel-like-one-to-one-in-customer-success (accessed March 2021).
  • 8 Tipos. SmartHint. https://www.smarthint.co/en/8-tipos-de-mecanismos-de-recomendacao-de-produto-que-sua-loja-precisa (accessed March 2021).
  • Strack, F.; and Deutsch, R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and social psychology review, 8, 3 (2004), 220–247.
  • Swaminathan, V. The impact of recommendation agents on consumer evaluation and choice: The moderating role of category risk, product complexity, and consumer knowledge. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 1–2 (2003), 93–101.
  • Tan, C.-W.; Benbasat, I.; and Cenfetelli, R. T. An exploratory study of the formation and impact of electronic service failures. MIS Quarterly, 40, 1 (2016), 1–29.
  • Tan, C.-H.; Teo, H.-H.; and Benbasat, I. Assessing screening and evaluation decision support systems: A resource-matching approach. Information Systems Research, 21, 2 (2010), 305–326.
  • Thiem, A. Unifying configurational comparative methods: Generalized-set qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 43, 2 (2014), 313–337.
  • Thorndike, E. L. Animal Intelligence. New York: Macmillan, 1911.
  • Tiihonen, J.; and Felfernig, A. An introduction to personalization and mass customization. Journal of Intelligent Information System, 49, 1–7 (2017).
  • Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G.; Davis, G. B.; and Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3 (2003), 425–478.
  • Wang, W., and Benbasat, I. Attributions of trust in decision support technologies: A study of recommendation agents for e-commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (2008), 249–273.
  • Xiao, B., and Benbasat, I. E-commerce product recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 31, 1 (2007), 137–209.
  • Zajonc, R. B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 2 (1980), 151–175.
  • Zhang, T. (C); Agarwal, R.; and Lucas, H. C., Jr. The value of IT-enabled retailer learning: personalized product recommendations and customer store loyalty in electronic markets. MIS Quarterly, 35, 4 (2011), 859–881.
  • Zhu, Z.; Nakata, C.; Sivakumar, K.; and Grewal, D. Self-service technology effectiveness: The role of design features and individual traits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 4 (2007), 492–506.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.