Outcomes of Cyber-Victimization and Bystander Reactions in Online Brand Communities

References

• Álvarez-García, D., Núñez, J.C., Barreiro-Collazo, A., and García, T. Validation of the Cybervictimization Questionnaire (CYVIC) for adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 70 (2017), 270–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Express. Protecting Your Company From Business Cyberbullying. 2018. https://www.americanexpress.com/en-us/business/trends-and-insights/articles/protecting-company-business-cyberbullying (accessed on July 18, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., and Stephen, A.T. The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 1 (2020), 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, N., Ngai, E.W.T., and Cheng, T.C.E. Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation: An equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quarterly, 32 (2008), 43–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacile, T.J., Wolter, J.S., Allen, A.M., and Xu, P. The effects of online incivility and consumer-to-consumer interactional justice on complainants, observers, and service providers during social media service recovery. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 44 (2018), 60–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M.A., Barlett, N.D., Livengood, J.L., Murphy, D.L., and Brewton, K.E. Factors associated with children’s anticipated responses to ambiguous teases. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171, 1 (2010), 54–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., Desmet, A., and De Bourdeaudhuij, I. Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the Bully. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 1 (2014), 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Berendt, J., Uhrich, S., and Thompson, S.A. Marketing, Get ready to rumble—How rivalry promotes distinctiveness for brands and consumers. Journal of Business Research, 88 (2018), 161–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukeboom, C.J., Kerkhof, P., and de Vries, M. Does a virtual like cause actual liking? How following a brand’s Facebook updates enhances brand evaluations and purchase intention. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 32 (2015), 26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 3 (2001), 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosnjak, M., and Rudolph, N. Undesired self-image congruence in a low-involvement product context. European Journal of Marketing, 42, 5–6 (2008), 702–712.
   Google Scholar
• Breitsohl, J., Roschk, H., and Feyertag, C. Consumer brand bullying behaviour in online communities of service firms. In M. Bruhn and K. Hadwich (eds.), Service Business Development. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2018, pp. 289–312.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, R.J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., and Hollebeek, L. Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1 (2013), 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Broderick, A.J., and Lee, N. Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 3 (2007), 2–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T.J., Barry, T.E., Dacin, P.A., and Gunst, R.F. Spreading the word: Investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 2 (2005), 123–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., and Padilla, P. Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 5 (2010), 1128–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho, S., Hassanein, K., and Head, M. Cyberbullying impacts on victims’ satisfaction with information and communication technologies: The role of perceived cyberbullying severity. Information and Management, 55, 4 (2018), 494–507.
   Google Scholar
• Cenite, M., and Zhang, Y. Recommendations for hosting audience comments based on discourse ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 25, 4 (2010), 293–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.M., and Cheng, Y.Y. Perceived severity of cyberbullying behaviour: Differences between genders, grades and participant roles. Educational Psychology, 37, 5 (2017), 599–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R.B., and Goldstein, N.J. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55 (2004), 591–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, B.A., and West, M. Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior, 60 (2016), 233–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, I., Farley, S., Axtell, C., Sprigg, C., Best, L., and Kwok, O. Understanding the relationship between experiencing workplace cyberbullying, employee mental strain and job satisfaction: A dysempowerment approach. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28, 7 (2017), 945–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cybersmile. Stop Cyberbullying Day. 2020. https://www.cybersmile.org/stop-cyberbullying-day (accessed on July 18, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• De Matos, C.A., and Rossi, C.A.V. Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 4 (2008), 578–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, L., Gensler, S., and Leeflang, P.S.H. Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 2 (2012), 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessart, L., and Pitardi, V. How stories generate consumer engagement: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 104 (2019),183–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P., and Pearo, L.K. A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 3 (2004), 241–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dineva, D., Breitsohl, J., and Garrod, B. Corporate conflict management on social media brand fan pages. Journal of Marketing Management, 33, 9–10 (2017), 679–698.
   Google Scholar
• Dineva, D., Breitsohl, J., Garrod, B., and Megicks, P. Consumer responses to conflict-management strategies on non-profit social media fan pages. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 52 (2020), 118–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, M.T., Wagstaff, P.E., and Powell, I.H. Brand rivalry and community conflict. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1 (2013), 4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbus, P. Commentary: The case for a healthier social customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 85, 1 (2021), 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Giumetti, G.W., McKibben, E.S., Hatfield, A.L., Schroeder, A.N., and Kowalski, R.M. Cyber incivility @ work: The new age of interpersonal deviance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 3 (2012), 148–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godey, B., Manthiou, A., Pederzoli, D., Rokka, J., Aiello, G., Donvito, R., and Singh, R. Social media marketing efforts of luxury brands: Influence on brand equity and consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69, 12 (2016), 5833–5841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golf-Papez, M., and Veer, E. Don’t feed the trolling: Rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33, 15–16 (2017), 1336–1354.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, S.D., and Mason, W. Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66 (2015), 877–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M., Kaltcheva, V.D., and Rohm, A.J. Social media and value creation: The role of interaction satisfaction and interaction immersion. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 36 (2016), 121–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, R., Ferraro, R., Haws, K.L., and Mukhopadhyay, A. Traveling with companions: The social customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 85, 1 (2021), 68–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, T., and Ward, J. The dark side of brand community: Inter-group stereotyping, trash talk, and schadenfreude. Advances in Consumer Research, 34 (2007), 314–319.
   Google Scholar
• Hinduja, S., and Patchin, J.W. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 3 (2010), 206–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holfeld, B. Perceptions and attributions of bystanders to cyber bullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 38 (2014), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., Kumar, S., Huang, J., and Ratnavelu, K. The predictors of users’ satisfaction in an anonymous environment: The role of the negative true self. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39, 2 (2020), 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husemann, K.C., Ladstaetter, F. and Luedicke, M.K. Conflict culture and conflict management in consumption communities. Psychology & Marketing, 32, 3 (2015), 265–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilhan, B.E., Kübler, R.V., and Pauwels, K.H. Battle of the brand fans: Impact of brand attack and defense on social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 43 (2018), 33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, J.P., Harkins, S.G., and Williams, K.D. Need threat can motivate performance after ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 5 (2010), 690–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Olfman, L., Ko, I., Koh, J., and Kim, K. The influence of on-line brand community characteristics on community commitment and brand loyalty. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12, 3 (2008), 57–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X.L., Zhou, Z., Lee, M.K.O., and Cheung, C.M.K. Why users keep answering questions in online question answering communities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 1 (2013), 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A.R., Matear, M., and Thomson, M. A coal in the heart: Self-relevance as a post-exit predictor of consumer anti-brand actions. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 1 (2011), 108–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.S., and Lowe, B. Emotional support, perceived corporate ownership and skepticism toward out-groups in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 29 (2015), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, N.Y., Kim, S., and Kim, S. Influence of consumer attitude toward online brand community on revisit intention and brand trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21, 4 (2014), 581–589.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptein, M., Parvinen, P., and Pöyry, E. The danger of engagement: Behavioral observations of online community activity and service spending in the online gaming context. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 1 (2015), 50–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R.A., Racherla, P., and Bush, V.D. What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 3 (2014), 167–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, C., and Weber, M. “Do I really need to help?!” Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders’ willingness to help the victim. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12, 4 (2018), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R.M., Giumetti, G.W., Schroeder, A.N., and Lattanner, M.R. Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 4 (2014), 1073–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R.M., Toth, A., and Morgan, M. Bullying and cyberbullying in adulthood and the workplace. Journal of Social Psychology, 158, 1 (2018), 64–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, Y.C., Chen, R., and Zhang, H. Why do users continue using social networking sites? An exploratory study of members in the United States and Taiwan. Information and Management, 50, 7 (2013), 571–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. Behavioral strategies for dealing with flaming in an online forum. Sociological Quarterly, 46, 2 (2005), 385–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, T.C., Nouwen, A., and Sheffield, D. Social support and individual variability in patterns of haemodynamic reactivity and recovery. Psychology and Health, 22, 4 (2007), 473–492.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, T.P., Ho, Y.T., Li, Y.W., and Turban, E. What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 2 (2011), 69–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limayem, M., and Cheung, C.M.K. Understanding information systems continuance: The case of Internet-based learning technologies. Information & Management, 45, 4 (2008), 227–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K.Y., and Lu, H.P. Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 3 (2011), 1152–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luedicke, M.K., Thompson, C.J., and Giesler, M. Consumer identity work as moral protagonism: How myth and ideology animate a brand-mediated moral conflict. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 6 (2010), 1016–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, P.J., Boulton, M.J., and Betts, L.R. Comparing early adolescents’ positive bystander responses to cyberbullying and traditional bullying: The impact of severity and gender. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4, 3 (2019), 253–261.
   Google Scholar
• Mamonov, S., Koufaris, M., and Benbunan-Fich, R. The role of the sense of community in the sustainability of social network sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 4 (2016), 470–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlexander, J.H., Kim, S.K., and Roberts, S.D. Loyalty: The influences of satisfaction and brand community integration. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11, 4 (2003), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Muniz, A.M. and Hamer, L.O. Us versus them: Oppositional brand loyalty and the cola wars. In M.C. Gilly and J.M. Valdosta (eds.), NA—Advances in Consumer Research. Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research, 2001, pp. 355–361.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, S.B., and Rice, R.E. A dual-identity model of responses to deviance in online groups: Integrating social identity theory and expectancy violations theory. Communication Theory, 27, 3 (2017), 243–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermaier, M., Fawzi, N., and Koch, T. Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 18, 8 (2014), 1491–1507.
   Google Scholar
• Olenik-Shemesh, D., Heiman, T., and Eden, S. Cyberbullying victimisation in adolescence: Relationships with loneliness and depressive mood. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17, 3–4 (2012), 361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Ordoñez, M.A.M., and Nekmat, E. ‘Tipping point’ in the SoS? Minority-supportive opinion climate proportion and perceived hostility in uncivil online discussion. New Media & Society, 21, 11–12 (2019), 2483–2504.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, R., Elipe, P., Mora-Merchán, J.A., Calmaestra, J., and Vega, E. The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: A study of Spanish adolescents. Journal of Psychology, 217, 4 (2009), 197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S.B., Rutland, A., and Cameron, L. The development of bystander intentions and social–moral reasoning about intergroup verbal aggression. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 4 (2015), 419–433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patchin, J.W., and Hinduja, S. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 2 (2006), 148–169.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, D.U., Hong, J.S., Williams, A.B., and Allen-Meares, P. A review of research on school bullying among African American youth: An ecological systems analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 2 (2013), 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paull, M., Omari, M., and Standen, P. When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, 3 (2012), 351–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, H.G., de Fátima Salgueiro, M., and Mateus, I. Say yes to Facebook and get your customers involved! Relationships in a world of social networks. Business Horizons, 57, 6 (2014), 695–702.
   Google Scholar
• Perren, S., and Alsaker, F.D. Social behavior and peer relationships of victims, bully-victims, and bullies in kindergarten. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 1 (2006), 45–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. The State of Online Harassment. 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment (accessed on February 11, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., and Lea, M. Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 6 (1998), 689–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., and Lea, M. Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 1 (2002), 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C. Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 2 (2010), 112–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C. Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory into Practice, 53, 4 (2014), 286–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., and Poskiparta, E. Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 5 (2011), 668–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., and Boos, M. Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category norms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 4 (2003), 405–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, S., Chen, Y., and Chow, W.S. Key values driving continued interaction on brand pages in social media: An examination across genders. Computers in Human Behavior, 62 (2016), 578–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slonje, R., Smith, P.K., and Frisén, A. The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1 (2013), 26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart Insights. Global social media research summary 2020. 2020. https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research (accessed on July 2, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Statista. U.S. Internet users who have experienced cyber bullying 2018. 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/333942/us-internet-online-harassment-severity (accessed on February 18, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Statista. Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2020, ranked by number of active users. 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users (accessed on July 2, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Statusbrew. 100 Social media statistics for marketers in 2020 + [Infographic]. 2019. https://statusbrew.com/insights/social-media-statistics-2020 (accessed on March 10, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• The New York Times. Instagram is trying to curb bullying. First, it needs to define bullying. 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/technology/instagram-bullying-teenagers.html (accessed on July 18, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, T.C., Price, L.L., and Schau, H.J. When differences unite: Resource dependence in heterogeneous consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 5 (2013), 1010–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S.A., and Sinha, R.K. Brand communities and new product adoption: The influence and limits of oppositional loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 72, 6 (2008), 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hee, C., Lefever, E., Verhoeven, B., Mennes, J., Desmet, B., De Pauw, G., Daelemans, W., and Hoste, V. Automatic detection and prevention of cyberbullying. In P. Lorenz and B. Christian (eds.), International Conference on Human and Social Analytics (HUSO 2015). Malta: IARIA, 2015, pp. 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Venngage. 80+ Branding statistics you should know for 2020. 2019. https://venngage.com/blog/branding-statistics (accessed on March 10, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K.D., and Nida, S.A. Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 2 (2011), 71–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, H.R., Hsu, S.H.Y., and Huang, C.Y. Good soldiers on the Web: Understanding the drivers of participation in online communities of consumption. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 4 (2011), 89–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, H., and Enginkaya, E. Brand followers: Motivations and attitudes of consumers to follow brands in social media. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 9, 1 (2015), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yüksel, A. and Yüksel, F. Shopping risk perceptions: Effects on tourists’ emotions, satisfaction and expressed loyalty intentions. Tourism Management, 28, 3 (2007), 703–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K.Z., and Benyoucef, M. Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review. Decision Support Systems, 86 (2016), 95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimet, G.D., Dahlem, N.W., Zimet, S.G., and Farley, G.K. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 1 (1988), 30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar