Factors Influencing User-Idea Selection in Open Innovation Communities

References

• Adamczyk, S.; Bullinger, A.C.; and Möslein, K.M. Innovation contests: A review, classification and outlook. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 4 (2012), 335–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman, H.; Plewa, C.; and Conduit, J. Co-creating value in online innovation communities. European Journal of Marketing, 53, 6 (2019), 1205–1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antorini, Y.M.; Muniz, A.M., Jr.; and Askildsen, T. Collaborating with customer communities: Lessons from the Lego group. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 3 (2012), 73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleyard, M.M.; and Chesbrough, H.W. The dynamics of open strategy: From adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, 50, 3 (2017), 310–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. The” art” of rhetoric. Harvard University Press, 1926, pp. 30–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J.; Gremler, D.; and McCollough, M. Service encounter emotional value. Services Marketing Quarterly, 23(2001), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J.A. Class and commitees in a Norwegian island parish. In S. Leinhardt (ed.), Social networks. Academic Press, 1977, pp. 233–252.
   Google Scholar
• Bayus, B.L. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59, 1 (2013), 226–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beretta, M. Idea selection in web-enabled ideation systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36 (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A.; and Sanford, C. Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, 30, 4 (2006), 805–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blohm, I.; Leimeister, J.M.; and Krcmar, H. Crowdsourcing: How to benefit from (too) many great ideas. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12, 4 (2013), 199–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem, A.; Bilgram, V.; and Marchuk, A. How crowdfunding platforms change the nature of user innovation – from problem solving to entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144(2019), 348–360.
   Google Scholar
• Brinks, V. Fun or frustration? How emotions shape user innovation processes. Emotion, Space and Society, 34 (2020), 100651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X.; Fu, S.; de Vreede, T.; De Vreede, G.-J.; Seeber, I.; Maier, R. and Weber, B. Idea convergence quality in open innovation crowdsourcing: A cognitive load perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37,2 (2020), 349–376
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. Open innovation: Striving for innovation success in the 21st century. Reinventing the Company in the Digital Age, 2014, 395–410.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H.; Kim, S.; and Agogino, A. Chez Panisse: Building an open innovation ecosystem. California Management Review, 56, 4 (2014), 144–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H.; Lettl, C.; and Ritter, T. Value creation and value capture in open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35, 6 (2018), 930–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H.W. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Review Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, C.M.-Y.; Sia, C.-L.; and Kuan, K.K.Y. Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 8 (2012), 618–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crano, W.D.; and Prislin, R. Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(2006), 345–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Culnan, M.J.; McHugh, P.J.; and Zubillaga, J.I. How large U.S. companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9, 4 (2010), 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastjerdi, A.M.; Kaplan, S.; de Abreu e Silva, J.; Anker Nielsen, O. and Camara Pereira, F. Use intention of mobility-management travel apps: The role of users goals, technophile attitude and community trust. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 126 (2019), 114–135.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, C.; Bourlakis, M.; Alamanos, E.; Papagiannidis, S. and Brakus, J.J. Value co-creation through multiple shopping channels: The interconnections with social exclusion and well-being. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 21, 4 (2017), 517–547.
   Google Scholar
• Di Gangi, P.M.; and Wasko, M. Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems, 48, 1 (2009), 303–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gangi, P.M.; Wasko, M.; and Hooker, R. Getting customers’ ideas to work for you: Learning from Dell how to succeed with online user innovation communities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9, 4 (2010), 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L.C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(1979), 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• Füller, J.; Hutter, K.; Hautz, J. and Matzler, K. User Roles and Contributions in Innovation-Contest Communities. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 1 (2014), 273-307.
   Google Scholar
• Gatzweiler, A.; Blazevic, V.; and Piller, F. When users take control: Managing the dark side of customr co-creation. ISPIM Magazine, 3 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gault, F. User innovation and the market. Science and Public Policy, 39, 1 (2012), 118–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose, A.; and Ipeirotis, P.G. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23, 10 (2011), 1498–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, M.R.;, Criscuolo, P.; and George, G. Which Problems to Solve? Attention Allocation and Online Knowledge Sharing In Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 3 (2014), 680–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J.-T.; Chen, Q.; Liu, J.-G.; Luo, X.-L. and Fan, W. The persuasion of borrowers' voluntary information in peer to peer lending: An empirical study based on elaboration likelihood model. Computers in Human Behavior, 78 (2018), 200-214.
   Google Scholar
• Hashim, K.F.; and Tan, F.B. Examining the determinant factors of perceived online community usefulness using the expectancy value model. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 20, 2 (2018), 164–181.
   Google Scholar
• Hashim, K.F.; and Tan, F.B. Examining the determinant factors of perceived online community usefulness using the expectancy value model. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 20, 2 (2018), 152–167.
   Google Scholar
• Hau, Y.S.; and Kang, M. Extending lead user theory to users’ innovation-related knowledge sharing in the online user community: The mediating roles of social capital and perceived behavioral control. International Journal of Information Management, 36, 4 (2016), 520–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heit, E.; and Rotello, C.M. The pervasive effects of argument length on inductive reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 18, 3 (2012), 244–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C.I.; Janis, I.L.; and Kelley, H.H. Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. American Sociological Review, 19, 3 (1954), 355–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.; Param Vir Singh; and Srinivasan, K. Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Science, 60, 9 (2014), 2138–2159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, K.; Hautz, J.; Füller, J., Mueller; J. and Matzler, K. Communitition: The Tension between Competition and Collaboration in Community-Based Design Contests. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30, 4 (2011), 3-21.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, L.; and Katarya, R. Discover opinion leader in online social network using firefly algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 122(2019), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Q.; Ravid, G.; and Rafaeli, S. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research, 15, 2 (2004), 194–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.; Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Gu, B.; Info, A. and Claims External Bridging and Internal Bonding: Unlocking the Generative Resources of Member Time and Attention Spent in Online Communities. MIS Quarterly, 42, 1 (2018), 265-284.
   Google Scholar
• King, A.A.; and Lakhani, K.R. Using open innovation to identify the best ideas. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55, 1 (2013), 41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornish, L.J.; and Hutchison-Krupat, J. Research on idea generation and selection: Implications for management of technology. Production and Operations Management, 26, 4 (2017), 633–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanham, R.A. The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. University of Chicago Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K.; and Salter, A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 2 (2006), 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq, T.; Poncin, I.; and Hammedi, W. The engagement process during value co-creation: Gamification in new product-development platforms. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 21, 4 (2017), 454–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J.J.C. The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 23, 4–5 (2003), 727–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-H.M.; and Dolen, W.v. Creative participation: Collective sentiment in online co-creation communities. Information & Management, 52, 8 (2015), 951–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewinski, P.; Fransen, M.L.; and Tan, E.S. Embodied resistance to persuasion in advertising. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (2016), 01202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M.; Kankanhalli, A.; and Kim, S.H. Which ideas are more likely to be implemented in online user innovation communities? An empirical analysis. Decision Support Systems, 84(2016), 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, T.-P.; Li, X.; Yang, C.-T. and Wang, M. What in Consumer Reviews Affects the Sales of Mobile Apps: A Multifacet Sentiment Analysis Approach. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 2 (2015), 236-260.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, M. Small data: The tiny clues that uncover huge trends. St. Martin’s Press, 2016, pp. 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q.; Du, Q.; Hong, Y.; Fan, W. and Wu, S. User idea implementation in open innovation communities: Evidence from a new product development crowdsourcing community. Information Systems Journal, 30, 5 (2020), 899-927.
   Google Scholar
• Lowrey, T.M. The effects of syntactic complexity on advertising persuasiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 2 (1998), 187–206.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J.; Lu, Y.; and Gupta, S. User innovation evaluation: Empirical evidence from an online game community. Decision Support Systems, 117(2019), 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Maaya, L.; Meulders, M.; and Vandebroek, M. Online consumers’ attribute non-attendance behavior: effects of information provision. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 3 (2020), 338–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahr, D.; and Lievens, A. Virtual lead user communities: Drivers of knowledge creation for innovation. Research Policy, 41, 1 (2012), 167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallapragada, G.; Grewal, R.; and Lilien, G. User-generated open source products: Founder’s social capital and time to product release. Marketing Science, 31, 3 (2012), 474–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D.; Train, K.; and Tye, W.B. An application of diagnostic tests for the independence from irrelevant alternatives property of the multimomial logit model. Transportation Research Board, 637(1977), 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mingione, M.; Cristofaro, M.; and Mondi, D. ‘If I give you my emotion, what do I get?’ Conceptualizing and measuring the co-created emotional value of the brand. Journal of Business Research, 109(2020), 310–320.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. Justification explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of varying support articulation in persuasive messages. Argumentation and Advocacy, 35, 2 (1998), 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ocasio, W. Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22, 5 (2011), 1286–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otterbacher, J., ‘Helpfulness’ in online communities: A measure of message quality. CHI ‘09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 2009, pp. 955–964.
   Google Scholar
• Özaygen, A.; and Balagué, C. Idea evaluation in innovation contest platforms: A network perspective. Decision Support Systems, 112(2018), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pantano, E.; Priporas, C.-V.; and Baier, D. Guest editors’ introduction: Smart interaction with consumers: From co-creation to smart partnership. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 21, 4 (2017), 449–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E.; and Cacioppo, J.T. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. American Journal of Psychology, (1988), 155–156.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E.; and Cacioppo, J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19(1986), 123–205.
   Google Scholar
• Pongtanalert, K.; and Ogawa, S. Classifying user-innovators—An approach to utilize user-innovator asset. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 37(2015), 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Rajalahti, T.; and Kvalheim, O.M. Multivariate data analysis in pharmaceutics: A tutorial review. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 417, 1 (2011), 280–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran, L.; Lin, Z.; Lin, H.; Wang, W. and Meng, D. Text Emotion Analysis: A Survey Journal of Computer Research and Development, 55, 1 (2018), 30-52. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Rietzschel, E.; Nijstad, B.; and Stroebe, W. The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 101(2009), 47–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riley, M.W. Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. American Sociological Review, 19, 3 (1954), 355–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, A.; Ter Wal, A.L.J.; Criscuolo, P. and Alexy, O. Open for ideation: Individual-level openness and idea generation in R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 4 (2015), 488-504.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, S.; and Singer, J. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 5 (1962), 379–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavraki, M.; Lamprinakos, G.; Briñol, P.; Petty, R.E.; Karantinou, K. and Díaz, D. The influence of emotions on information processing and persuasion: A differential appraisals perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93 (2021), 104085.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S.E.; and Fiske, S.T. Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press, 1978, pp. 249–288.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. Foreword: Progress in research on user innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 37(2015), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32, 7 (1986), 791–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostwick, W. Starbucks sponsors coffee-cup redesign contest. New York Times, March 17, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X.; Yuen, K.F.; Teo, C.-C. and Wong, Y.D. Online Consumers’ Satisfaction in Self-Collection: Value Co-Creation from the Service Fairness Perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 25, 2 (2021), 230-260.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.Q.; and Kelling, G.L. Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 3 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T., The attention merchants: The epic scramble to get inside our heads. Knopf, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, J.; Leidner, D.E.; Benbya, H. and Zou, W. Social capital and knowledge contribution in online user communities: One-way or two-way relationship? Decision Support Systems, 127 (2019), 113131.
   Google Scholar