How to Achieve Maximum Participation of Users in Technical Versus Nontechnical Online Q&A Communities?

References

• Algesheimer, R.; Dholakia, U.M.; and Herrmann, A. The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69, 3 (2005), 19–4. doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.3.19.66363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, A.; and Hagel, J. The real value of online communities. In Knowledge and communities, Vol. 74. New York, NY: Routledge, 2000, pp. 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J.S.; and Overton, T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 3 (1977), 396–402. doi:10.1177/002224377701400320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: General Learning Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A.V. A simple model of herd behavior*. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 3 (1992), 797–817. doi:10.2307/2118364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benlian, A.; and Hess, T. The signaling role of IT features in influencing trust and participation in online communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 4 (2011), 7–56. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415150401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzozowski, M.J.; Sandholm, T.; and Hogg, T. Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work, Sanibel Island, FL, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1145/1531674.1531684
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-J.; and Hung, S.-W. To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47, 4 (2010), 226–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Baird, A.; and Straub, D. Why do participants continue to contribute? Evaluation of usefulness voting and commenting motivational affordances within an online knowledge community. Decision Support Systems, 118 (2009), 21–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, C.-M.; Hsu, M.-H.; and Wang, E.T.G. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42, 3 (2006), 1872–1888. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, A.; and Fischbacher, U. A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54, 2 (2006), 293–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S.; Jarvenpaa, S. L.; and Majchrzak, A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22, 5 (2011), 1224–1239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P.C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 4 (2007), 1180–1198. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P.C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of management Journal, 54, 2 (2011), 393–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, C.; and Li, H. Understanding the effects of gratifications on the continuance intention to use WeChat in China: A perspective on uses and gratifications. Computers in Human Behavior, 78 (2018), 306–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnefeld, I.; Iseke, A.; and Krebs, A. Explicit incentives in online communities: Boon or bane? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 1 (2012), 11–38. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415170101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goes, P.B.; Guo, C.; and Lin, M. Do incentive hierarchies induce user effort? Evidence from an online knowledge exchange. Information Systems Research, 27, 3 (2016), 497–516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, T.; Wang, L.; Jin, J.; and Song, X. Knowledge contribution behavior in online Q&A communities: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 81 (2018), 137–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; and Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F. Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; and Sarstedt, M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C.-W. Identify with community or company? An investigation on the consumer behavior in Facebook brand community. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 4 (2015), 930–939. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Q.; Davison, R.M.; and Gu, J. The impact of trust, guanxi orientation and face on the intention of Chinese employees and managers to engage in peer-to-peer tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 21, 6 (2011), 557–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imlawi, J.; and Gregg, D. Understanding the satisfaction and continuance intention of knowledge contribution by health professionals in online health communities. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 45, 2 (2020), 151–167. doi:10.1080/17538157.2019.1625053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason, L.A.; Glantsman, O.; O’Brien, J.F.; and Ramian, K.N. Introduction to community psychology. Rebus Community, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, J.; Li, Y.; Zhong, X.; and Zhai, L. Why users contribute knowledge to online communities: An empirical study of an online social Q&A community. Information & Management, 52, 7 (2015), 840–849. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X.-L.; Zhou, Z.; Lee, M.K.O.; and Cheung, C.M.K. Why users keep answering questions in online question answering communities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 1 (2013), 93–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, L.-Y.; Jaafar, N.I.; and Ainin, S. Understanding Facebook commerce (f-commerce) actual purchase from an artificial neural network perspective. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 19, 1 (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, J.; Dong, X.; and Guo, Y. Examining knowledge contribution in firm- versus consumer-hosted virtual brand community. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 41 (2020), 100963. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Q.V.; and Fu, W.-T. Age differences in credibility judgments of online health information. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interactions, 21, 2 (2014). doi:10.1145/2534410
   Google Scholar
• Liou, D.-K.; Chih, W.-H.; Yuan, C.-Y.; and Lin, C.-Y. The study of the antecedents of knowledge sharing behavior. Internet Research, 26, 4 (2016), 845–868. doi:10.1108/IntR-10-2014-0256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L.; Cheung, C.M.K.; and Lee, M.K.O. An empirical investigation of information sharing behavior on social commerce sites. International Journal of Information Management, 36, 5 (2016), 686–699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.; Mezei, J.; Kostakos, V.; and Li, H. Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioural research: a methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities. Information Systems Journal, 27, 1 (2017), 59–89. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamonov, S.; Koufaris, M.; and Benbunan-Fich, R. The ole of the sense of community in the sustainability of social network sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 4 (2016), 470–498. doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1171974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S.; Sohail, M. T.; Alroobaea, R.; Rubaiee, S.; Anas, A.; Othman, A.M.; and Nawaz, M. Éclaircissement to understand consumers’ decision-making psyche and gender effects, a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13 (2022). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S.; Zhang, W.; Shehzad, M.U.; Anwar, A.; and Rubakula, G. Does health consciousness matter to adopt new technology? An integrated model of UTAUT2 with SEM-fsQCA approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13 (2022). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.836194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai, P.; and Tsai, H.-T. Reciprocity norms and information-sharing behavior in online consumption communities: An empirical investigation of antecedents and moderators. Information & Management, 53, 1 (2016), 38–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Y.; Wan, Y.; Fan, J.; Liu, B.; and Archer, N. Raising the cohesion and vitality of online communities by reducing privacy concerns. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 21, 2 (2017), 151–183. doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1234281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, I.O.; Kourouthanassis, P.E.; Giannakos, M.N.; and Chrissikopoulos, V. Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2 (2016), 794–803. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, I.O.; and Woodside, A.G. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58 (2021), 102310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1 (2012), 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A. On the effective use and reuse of HCI knowledge. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact, 7, 2 (2000), 197–221. doi:10.1145/353485.353488
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H.; Billig, M.G.; Bundy, R.P.; and Flament, C. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol, 1, 2 (1971), 149–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, H.-T.; and Bagozzi, R.P. Contribution behavior in virtual communities. Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. MIS Quarterly, 38, 1 (2014), 143–164. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26554872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W.; and Ghoshal, S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 41, 4 (1998), 464–476. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/257085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X.; Lu, J.; Ow, T.T.; Feng, Y.; and Liu, L. Understanding the emotional and informational influence on customer knowledge contribution through quantitative content analysis. Information & Management, 58, 2 (2021), 103426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werts, C.E.; Linn, R.L.; and Jöreskog, K.G. Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 1 (1974), 25–33. doi:10.1177/001316447403400104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiertz, C.; and de Ruyter, K. Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organization Studies, 28, 3 (2007), 347–376. doi:10.1177/0170840607076003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A.G. Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66, 4 (2013), 463–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A.G. Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67, 12 (2014), 2495–2503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A.G. The complexity turn: Cultural, management, and marketing applications. Springer, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z.; Wang, T.; Chen, Y.; and Zhang, H. Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management, 53, 5 (2016), 643–653. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-F.; Yeh, H.-C.; and Wong, W.-K. The influence of social interaction on meaning construction in a virtual community. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 2 (2010), 287–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00934.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, H.J.; Feng, Y.; and Choi, B.C.F. Understanding knowledge contribution in online knowledge communities: A model of community support and forum leader support. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14, 1 (2015), 34–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zack, M.H. Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40, 4 (1999), 45–58. Retrieved from http://web.nchu.edu.tw/pweb/users/arborfish/lesson/8948.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Deng, Z.; and Chen, X. Knowledge sharing motivations in online health communities: A comparative study of health professionals and normal users. Computers in Human Behavior, 75 (2017), 797–810. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, L.; Detlor, B.; and Connelly, C.E. Sharing knowledge in social Q&A sites: The unintended consequences of extrinsic motivation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 1 (2016), 70–100. doi:10.1080/07421222.2016.1172459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar