Competition Between Two-Sided Platforms With Quality-Based Subsidization

References

• Akerlof, G.A. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 3 (1970), 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 3 (2006), 668–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M.; and Wright, J. Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Economic Theory, 32(2007), 353–380.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, H.; Ahn, J.; and Choi, Y. Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers’ objectives and review cues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 2 (2012), 99–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakos, Y.; and Halaburda, H. Platform competition with multihoming on both sides: Subsidize or not?. Management Science, 66, 12 (2020), 5599–5607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleflamme, P.; and Peitz, M. Managing competition on a two-sided platform. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 28, 1 (2019), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K.; and Hagiu, A. Platforms rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. A. Gawer, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Edward Elgar, London, 2009, pp. 163–191.
   Google Scholar
• Cailaud, B.; and Jullien, B. Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34, 2 (2003), 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Annunzio, A. Vertical integration in the TV market: Exclusive provision and program quality. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 53 (July 2017), 114–144.
   Google Scholar
• Dou, Y.; and Wu, D.J. Platform competition under network effects: Piggybacking and optimal subsidization. Information System Research, 32, 3 (2021), 820–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economides, N.; and Katsamakas, E. Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science, 52, 7 (2006), 1057–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T.; Parker, G.; and Van Alstyne, M.W. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84, 10 (2006), 92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzion, H.; and Pang, M.S. Complementary online services in competitive markets: Maintaining profitability in the presence of network effects. MIS Quarterly, 38, 1 (2014), 231–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z.; Huang, L.; and Wierman, A. Prices and subsidies in the sharing economy. Performance Evaluation, 136 (2019), 102037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz, J.; and Wauthy, X. Two-sided markets and price competition with multi-homing. Discussion paper, 2004. doi:10.2139/ssrn.975897.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A.; and Cusumano, M.A. How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49, 2 (2008), 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A. Quantity vs. quality and exclusion by two-sided platforms. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 09-094, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Halaburda, H.; Piskorski, J.; and Yildirim, P. Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Science, 64, 8 (2018), 3574–3594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P.; Lyu, G.; and Xu, Y. Quality regulation on two-sided platforms: Exclusion, subsidy, and first-party applications. Management Science (2021), articles in advance.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H.; Prince, J.; and Qiu, C. Indirect network effects and the quality dimension: A look at the gaming industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 37(2014), 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K.; and Tse, E. Dynamic competition strategy for online knowledge-sharing plat-forms. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 1 (2011), 41–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leland, H.E. Quacks, lemons, and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 6 (1979), 1328–1346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M.; Li, S.; and Whinston, A.B. Innovation and price competition in a two-sided market. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 2 (2011), 171–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penttinen, E.; Halme, M.; Lyytinen, K.; and Myllynen, N. What influences choice of business-to-business connectivity platforms? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 22, 4 (2018), 479–509. doi:10.1080/10864415.2018.1485083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochet, J.C.; and Tirole, J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 4 (2003), 990–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronnen, U. Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 22, 4 (1991), 490–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S.; Zhang, B.; and Huang, Y. E-tailer’s supply chain structures in group buying: Monopolistic or competitive retailing? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 25, 4, (2021), 497–514. doi:10.1080/10864415.2021.1967006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S.; Chen, H.; and Wu, D. Regulating platform competition in two-sided markets under the O2O era. International Journal of Production Economics, 215(2019), 131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z.; Nan, G.F.; Li, M.Q.; and Tan, Y. Duopoly pricing strategy for information products with premium service: Free product or bundling? Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 1 (2016), 260–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. and Kaiser, H. Optimal quality threshold of admission in a two-sided farmers market. Applied Economics, 45, 23 (2013), 3360–3369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar