Michigan Mute Swan Management: A Case Study to Understand Contentious Natural Resource Management Issues

References

• Bengston, D. N., & Fan, D. P. (1999). Conflict over natural resource management: A social indicator based on analysis of online news media text. Society & Natural Resources, 12, 493–500. doi:10.1080/089419299279560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciaranca, M. A., Allin, C. C., & Jones, G. S. (1997). Mute swan (Cygnus olor). In A. Poole & F. Gill (Eds.), The birds of North America (No. 273) (online). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/273 doi: 10.2173/bna.273
   Google Scholar
• Clout, M. N., & Veitch, C. R. (2002). Turning the tide of biological invasion: The potential for eradicating invasive species. In M. N. Clout & C. R. Veitch (Eds.), Turning the tide: The eradication of invasive species. occasional paper of the species survival commission (No. 27, pp. 1–4). Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. B. (1995). When wildlife makes the news: An analysis of rural and urban north-central U.S. newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 397–410. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/4/4/004
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fogarty, B. (2011). The nature of local news media issue coverage of U.S. House members. The Social Science Journal, 48, 651–658. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fund for Animals v. Norton. (2003). 374 F.Supp. 2d 91 (D.D.C.2005). Retrieved from https://casetext.com/case/fund-for-animals-v-norton-12
   Google Scholar
• Google. (2012). About Google news. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/intl/en_us/about_google_news.html
   Google Scholar
• Gore, M. L., & Knuth, B. A. (2009). Mass media effect on the operating environment of a wildlife-related risk communication campaign. Journal of Wildlife Management, 73, 1407–1413. doi:10.2193/2008-343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, M. L., Nelson, M. P., Vucetich, J. A., Smith, A. M., & Clark, M. A. (2011). Exploring the ethical basis for conservation policy: The case of inbred wolves on Isle Royale, USA. Conservation Letters, 4, 394–401. doi:10.1111/conl.2011.4.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, M. L., Siemer, W. F., Shanahan, J. E., Scheufele, D., & Decker, D. J. (2005). Effects on risk perception of media coverage of a black bear-related human fatality. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 33, 507–516. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[507:EORPOM]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, M. (2012, March 19). Montague city council votes on mute swan cull on White Lake. MLive. Retrieved from http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2012/03/ montague_city_council_votes_on.html
   Google Scholar
• Hruschka, D. J., Schwartz, D., St. John, D. C., Picone-Decaro, E., Jenkins, R., & Carey, J. W. (2004). Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods, 16, 307–331. doi:10.1177/1525822X04266540
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckins, K. (1999). Interest-group influence on the media agenda: A case study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 76–86. doi:10.1177/107769909907600106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarreau, P. B. (2012, March 25). Got frames? Why how we frame the environment matters. SciLogs. Retrieved from http://www.scilogs.com/from_the_lab_bench/got-frames-why-how-we-frame-the-environment-matters/
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, A. M. (2011). Framing environmental risks in the Baltic Sea: A news media analysis. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 40, 121–132. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0124-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupp, V. (2006). The sage dictionary of social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Lowe, L., & Visser, P. S. (2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change, 77, 7–43. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9068-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, E. D. (2012, June 25). Activists speak out against culling of Michigan’s mute swans. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from http://archive.freep.com/article/20120625/NEWS05/206250349/Activists-speak-out-against-culling-of-Michigan-s-mute-swans
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Processing naturalistically obtained data. In Y. S. Lincoln & E. G. Guba (Eds.), Naturalistic inquiry (pp. 332–357). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Luxford, D. (2011, December 28). Wiping out Lincoln Lake swans was unnecessary. The Daily News. Retrieved from http://thedailynews.cc/2011/12/28/guest-view-wiping-out-lincoln-lake-swans-was-unnecessary/
   Google Scholar
• MacQueen, K., McLellan, E., Milstein, K. K., & Milstein, B. (1998). Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Field Methods, 10, 31–36. doi:10.1177/1525822X980100020301
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2009). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990–2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 349–367. doi:10.1177/107769900908600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. doi:10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2078–2091. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Natural Resource (MDNR). (2012). Mute swan management control program policy and procedures. Retrieved from https://www.michigan.gov/documents/dnr/2012_Mute_Swan_Policy_378701_7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Natural Resources. (2015, May 1). DNR managed lands (PA 240). Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,4570,7-153-31154-285534–,00.html
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as mass medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00174.x
   Google Scholar
• Muhr, T. (2012). ATLAS.ti 6.0 (Version 2) [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.atlasti.com/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. P., & Vucetich, J. A. (2012). Environmental ethics for wildlife management. In D. J. Decker, S. J. Riley, & W. F. Siemer (Eds.), Human dimensions of wildlife management (pp. 223–237). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, E. B., Milner-Gulland, E. J., Schofield, L., Mysterud, A., Stenseth, N. C., & Coulson, T. (2007). Wolf reintroduction to Scotland: Public attitudes and consequences for red deer management. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences, 274, 995–1003. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly, J. J., & Eckert, M. (2002). The myth of the “local” in American journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 310–326. doi:10.1177/107769900207900204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, D., & Perry, G. (2008). Improving interactions between animal rights groups and conservation biologists. Conservation Biology, 22, 27–35. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00845.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2012). In changing news landscape, even television is vulnerable. Retrieved from http://www.peoplepress.org/files/legacypdf/2012%20News%20 Consumption%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Siemer, W. F., Decker, D. J., & Shanahan, J. (2007). Media frames for black bear management stories during issue emergence in New York. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12, 89–100. doi:10.1080/10871200701195415
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 264–285. doi:10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamper, K. (2015). Killing of mute swans in Michigan. Change.org. Retrieved from https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-killing-of-mute-swans-in-michigan
   Google Scholar
• Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n = 17.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treves, A., & Naughton-Treves, L. (2005). Evaluating lethal control in the management of human-wildlife conflict. In R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, & A. Rabinowitz (Eds.), People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence (pp. 86–106). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Triezenberg, H. A., Knuth, B. A., & Yuan, Y. C. (2011). Evolution of public issues in wildlife management: How social networks and issue framing change through time. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 381–396. doi:10.1080/10871209.2011.608182
   Google Scholar
• United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2005). Final list of bird species to which the migratory bird treaty act does not apply. Federal Register, 70, 12710–12716. Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/policy/library/2005/05-5127.html
   Google Scholar
• Vucetich, J. A., & Nelson, M. P. (2014). Wolf hunting and the ethics of predator control. In L. Kalof (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of animal studies (Oxford Handbooks Online). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780.199927142.013.007
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, F. H., & Seal, U. S. (1992). Values, problems, and methodologies in managing overabundant wildlife populations: An overview. In D. R. McCullough & R. H. Barrett (Eds.), Wildlife 2001: Populations (pp. 279–293). London, UK: Elsevier Applied Science.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, T. J., & Raffaelli, D. (2008). Conversations in conservation: Revealing and dealing with language differences in environmental conflicts. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 1198–1204. doi:10.1111/jpe.2008.45.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, E. A. (2000). Software and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 803–821). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J. R., Gullo, A., & Lassiter, U. (1997). Changing attitudes toward California’s cougars. Society and Animals, 5, 95–116. doi:10.1163/156853097X00015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R., & Gelston, W. (1972). Preliminary report: The mute swans of Michigan’s Grand Traverse Bay region ( Report No. 2683). Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Division.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, H. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Vaske, J. J. (2000). Social psychological bases for stakeholder acceptance capacity. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 5(3), 20–33. doi:10.1080/10871200009359185
   Google Scholar