Thinking Globally But Not Acting Locally?: Expert and Public Perceptions of Environmental Threats and Conservation Actions

References

• Allen, W., & Kilvington, M. (1999 , August). Why involving people is important: The forgotten part of environmental information system management. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Multiple Objective Decision Support Systems for Land, Water, and Environmental Management, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L. D. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13, 367–383.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, S., Fraser, J., & Saunders, C., D. (2009). Zoo experiences: Conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biology, 28, 377–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierking, L., Adelman, L. M., & Ogden, J. (2004). Using a behavior change model to document the impact of visits to Disney’s Animal Kingdom: A study investigating intended conservation actions. Curator, 47, 322–343.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce U.S. carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106, 18452–18456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, R., Gavin, M. C., Sanchez, M., & Solomon, J. N. (2006). Pigeon paradox: The dependence of global conservation on urban nature. Conservation Biology, 20, 1814–1816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhauer, B. W., & Nicholson, B. (2005). Using stakeholders’ views: A social science methodology for the inclusive design of environmental communications. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 4, 19–20.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science exhibition. Science Education, 89, 744–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H. (2005). Free-choice environmental learning: Framing the discussion. Environmental Education Research, 11, 265–280.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., & Young, J. C. (2007). Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: Implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biological Conservation, 136, 271–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mira, R., & Real, J. E. (2005). Temporal and spatial dimensions in the perception of environmental problems: An investigation of the concept of environmental hyperopia. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 5–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., … Uzzell, D. L. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselink, F. J., Goldstein, W., van Kempen, P. P., Garnett, T., & Dela, J. (2007). Communication, education and public awareness (CEPA): A toolkit for national focal points and NBSAP coordinators. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Hughey, K. F. D., Kerr, G. N., & Cullen, R. (2010). Public perceptions of New Zealand’s environment, 2010. Christchurch, New Zealand: EOS Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN (2006a). Unified classification of direct threats: Version 1.0. Gland, Switzerland: World Conservation Union, The Conservation Measures Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN (2006b). Unified classification of conservation actions: Version 1.0. Gland, Switzerland: World Conservation Union, The Conservation Measures Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., Kazakov, D., & Lynch, C. (2007). Public and staff conservation values. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environment Change, 17, 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, E. (2011). The application of persuasive communication to promote conservation action at Wellington Zoo (Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand).
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 543–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing (3rd ed.). Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., Abrahamse, W., & McCarthy, N. (2011). Spatial and temporal biases in assessments of environmental conditions. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment. (2007). Environment New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/ser/enz07-dec07/
   Google Scholar
• Novacek, M. J. (2008). Engaging the public in biodiversity issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105, 11571–11578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W. (2001). Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics, 57, 120–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Bonn, A., Broad, K., Burgess, P., Burt, T. P., Fazey, I. R., … Redpath, S. (2012). Participatory scenario development for environmental management: A methodological framework (Sustainable Learning Working Paper Series No. 10). Aberdeen, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Salafsky, N., Salzer, D., Stattersfield, A. J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Neugarten, R., Butchart, S. H., … Wilkie, D. (2008). A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation unified classification for threats and actions. Conservation Biology, 22, 897–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. (2011). Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology, 25, 1080–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., Milfont, T. L., Chance, R. C., Tronu, G., Luis, S., Ando, K., … Gouveia, V. V. (2014). Cross-cultural evidence for spatial bias in beliefs about the severity of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior,46, 267–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzell, D. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 307–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J. R., & Word, C. S. (2001). The communication process as evaluative context: What do nonscientists hear when scientists speak? Bioscience, 51, 487–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington City Council. (2010). Wellington City Council annual report. Retrieved from http://wellington.govt.nz/˜/media/your-council/plans-policies-and-bylaws/plans-and-policies/annualreport/2010-11/files/2010-2011annualreport.pdf
   Google Scholar