The Influence of Human–Elephant Conflict on Electric Fence Management and Perception Among Different Rural Communities in Laikipia County, Kenya

References

• Adams, W. M., & Hutton, J. (2007). People, parks and poverty: Political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society, 5, 147–183.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, J. S., Lant, C. L., & Burnett, G. W. (1995). Conflicting attitudes toward state wildlife conservation programs in Kenya. Society & Natural Resources, 8, 133–144. doi:10.1080/08941929509380907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertson, A. (1998). Northern Botswana veterinary fences: Critical ecological impacts. Maun, Botswana: Okavango People’s Wildlife Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, B. (2007). The dual nature of parks: Attitudes of neighbouring communities towards Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environmental Conservation, 34, 236–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, M. (2010). Whose issue? Representations of human-elephant conflict in Indian and international media. Science Communication, 32, 55–75. doi:10.1177/1075547009353177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shahar, R. (1993). Does fencing reduce the carrying capacity for populations of large herbivores?. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 9, 249–253. doi:10.1017/S0266467400007252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc, J. J., Barnes, R. F., Craig, G. C., Dublin, H. T., Thouless, C. R., Douglas-Hamilton, I., & Hart, J. A. (2007). African Elephant Status Report 2007: An update from the African Elephant Database. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, J. J., Barnes, R. F. W., Craig, G. C., Douglas-Hamilton, I., Dublin, H. T., Hart, J. A., & Thouless, C. R. (2005). Changes in elephant numbers in savannah populations in East and Southern Africa. Pachyderm, 38, 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, J. (2014). Conflict, development and security at the agro-pastoral-wildlife nexus: A case of Laikipia County, Kenya. The Journal of Development Studies, 50, 991–1008. doi:10.1080/00220388.2014.909025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, R. B., & Hobbs, N. T. (2004). Lines around fragments: Effects of fencing on large herbivores. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 21, 147–158. doi:10.2989/10220110409485847
   Google Scholar
• Brinkhoff, T. (2013). Laikipia. Retrieved from www.citypopulation.de/php/kenya-admin.php?adm2id=31
   Google Scholar
• Brook, B. W., Whitehead, P. J., & Dingle, J. K. (2004). Potential cane toad short to medium term control techniques: The biological feasibility and cost of exclusion as a mitigating control strategy. Casuarina, Australia: Charles Darwin University.
   Google Scholar
• Bruyere, B. L., Beh, A. W., & Foster, G. (2011). Perceptions of wildlife parks by youth who live near them: A study in Samburu, Kenya. Children Youth and Environments, 21, 168–183.
   Google Scholar
• Chaminuka, P. (2010). What do the local communities say about fences? In K. Ferguson & J. Hanks (Eds.), Fencing impacts: A review of the environmental, spatial, and economic impacts of game and veterinary fencing in Africa with particular reference to the great limpopo and kavango-zambezi transfrontier conservation areas (pp. 53–55). Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, R., Collins, C. M., Sutton, S. G., & Huveneers, C. (2014). Public perception and understanding of shark attack mitigation measures in Australia. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 144–165. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.844289
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. A. (2014). Fencing the frontline: The separation of elephants and cultivation with electrified fences ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Gadd, M. E. (2005). Conservation outside of parks: Attitudes of local people in Laikipia, Kenya. Environmental Conservation, 32, 50–63. doi:10.1017/S0376892905001918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M., Gichohi, N., Kamau, F., Aike, G., Craig, B., Douglas-Hamilton, I., & Adams, W. M. (2009). The use of electrified fences to limit human elephant conflict: A case study of the Ol Pejeta Conservancy, Laikipia District, Kenya (Working Paper No. 1). Retrieved from Save the Elephants website, http://savetheelephants.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/2009ElectrifiedFences.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. D. (2007). Coexistence in a land use mosaic? Land use, risk and elephant ecology in Laikipia District, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. D., Adams, W. M., & Kahiro, G. N. (2012). Mobile phone communication in effective human elephant–conflict management in Laikipia County, Kenya. Oryx, 46, 137–144. doi:10.1017/S0030605311001104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. D., Douglas‐Hamilton, I., Adams, W. M., & Lee, P. C. (2009). The movement of African elephants in a human‐dominated land‐use mosaic. Animal Conservation, 12, 445–455. doi:10.1111/acv.2009.12.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. D., Notter, B., Adams, W. M., Lee, P. C., & Ochieng, T. N. (2010). Patterns of crop-raiding by elephants, Loxodonta Africana, in Laikipia, Kenya, and the management of human–elephant conflict . Systematics and Biodiversity, 8, 435–445. doi:10.1080/14772000.2010.533716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. D., & Ochieng, T. N. (2010). The use of electrified fences to mitigate human-elephant conflict: Experiences from the Laikipia Plateau in northern Kenya. In K. Ferguson & J. Hanks (Eds.), Fencing impacts: A review of the environmental, spatial, and economic impacts of game and veterinary fencing in Africa with particular reference to the Great Limpopo and Kavango-Zambezi transfrontier conservation areas (pp. 185–192). Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, M. W., & Kerley, G. I. H. (2009). Fencing for conservation: Restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes?. Biological Conservation, 142, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazzah, L., Dolrenry, S., Kaplan, D., & Frank, L. (2013). The influence of park access during drought on attitudes toward wildlife and lion killing behaviour in Maasailand, Kenya. Environmental Conservation, 40, 266–276. doi:10.1017/S0376892913000040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, R. K. (2002). Coping with uncertainty: Adaptive responses to drought and livestock disease in the Northern Kalahari. In D. Sporton & D. S. G. Thomas (Eds.), Sustainable livelihoods in kalahari environments (pp. 221–236). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, L. (2006). Introduction. In L. Hughes (Ed.), Moving the Maasai: A colonial misadventure (pp. 5–21). Palgrave Macmillan, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, L. (2007). Rough time in paradise: Claims, blames and memory making around some protected areas in Kenya. Conservation and Society, 5, 307–330.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. (1972). New archaeological sites in the Mukogodo area, Laikipia District (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2009). Population, households and density by sublocations - 2009. Retrieved from www.opendata.go.ke/Population/Census-Volume-1-Question-1-Population-Households-a/wd27-eki2
   Google Scholar
• Knickerbocker, T. J., & Waithaka, J. (2005). People and elephants in the Shimba Hills, Kenya. In R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, & A. Rabinowitz (Eds.), People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence (pp. 224–238). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, T. (1987). Land use in transition: Aspects and problems of small scale farming in a new environment--The example of Laikipia District, Kenya (Volume 5). Berne, Switzerland: Geographical Society of Berne.
   Google Scholar
• Lamprey, R., & Juma, J. (2008). The 2007 survey to determine local community perceptions of the Ol Pejeta conservancy. Nairobi, Kenya: Flora and Fauna International.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, P. (2011). An outline of the later holocene archaeology and precolonial history of the Ewaso Basin, Kenya. In N. J. Georgiadis (Ed.), Conserving wildlife in African landscapes Kenya’s ewaso ecosystem (pp. 11–30). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. C., & Graham, M. D. (2006). African elephants and human-elephant interactions: Implications for conservation. International Zoo Yearbook, 40, 9–19. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00009.x
   Google Scholar
• Lengoiboni, M., Bregt, A. K., & van der Molen, P. (2010). Pastoralism within land administration in Kenya—The missing link. Land Use Policy, 27, 579–588. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letai, J. (2011). Land deals in Kenya: The genesis of land deals in Kenya and its implication on pastoral livelihoods—A case study of Laikipia District. Unpublished report. Retrieved from http://landportal.info/sites/landportal.info/files/land_deals_in_kenya-initial_report_for_laikipia_district2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, P. A., Masterson, C. L., Beck, A. L., & Romañach, S. (2012). Ecological, social and financial issues related to fencing as a conservation tool in Africa. In M. J. Somers & M. Hayward (Eds.), Fencing for conservation (pp. 215–234). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Litoroh, M., Ihwangi, F. W., Mayienda, R., Bernard, J., & Douglas-Hamilton, I. (2010). Total aerial count of elephants in Laikipia-Samburu ecosystem in November 2008. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• McGahey, D. J. (2008). Maintaining opportunism and mobility in drylands: The impact of veterinary cordon fences in Botswana ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, C. A., Loveridge, A., Canney, S., Caro, S. T., Garnett, S. T., Pfeifer, M., … Haddad, N. (2013). Conserving large carnivores: Dollars and fence. Ecology Letters, 16, 635–641. doi:10.1111/ele.2013.16.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, P. (1965). The Samburu: A study of gerentocracy. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spierenburg, M., & Wells, H. (2006). “Securing space”: Mapping and fencing in transfrontier conservation in Southern Africa. Space and Culture, 9, 294–312. doi:10.1177/1206331206289018
   Google Scholar
• Sutmoller, P. (2002). The fencing issue relative to the control of foot‐and‐mouth disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 969, 191–200. doi:10.1111/nyas.2002.969.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, W. R. (1998). The costs of living with elephants in Namibia. In J. Lovell (Ed.), Proceedings from the workshop on cooperative regional wildlife management in Southern Africa (pp. 57–71). Davis, CA: University of California – Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Thouless, C. R. (1994). Conflict between humans and elephants on private land in northern Kenya. Oryx, 28, 119–127. doi:10.1017/S0030605300028428
   Google Scholar
• Thouless, C. R., & Sakwa, J. (1995). Shocking elephants: Fences and crop raiders in Laikipia District, Kenya. Biological Conservation, 72, 99–107. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)00071-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treves, A., & Karanth, K. U. (2003). Human‐carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology, 17, 1491–1499. doi:10.1111/cbi.2003.17.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, C. (2005). Changing patterns of land use during the colonial era. In P.J. Lane (Ed.) Landscape and Environmental Change in Semi-arid Regions of East & Southern Africa: Developing Interdisciplinary Approaches (pp. 12–25). Nairobi, Kenya: British Institute in East Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Western, D., & Waithaka, J. (2005). Policies for reducing human-wildlife conflict: A Kenya case study. In R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, & A. Rabinowitz (Eds.), People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence (pp. 357–372). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodroffe, R., Hedges, S., & Durant, S. M. (2014). To fence or not to fence. Science, 344(6179), 46–48. doi:10.1126/science.1246251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar