674
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Wildlife Value Orientations Among Hunters, Landowners, and the General Public: A Danish Comparative Quantitative Study

&

References

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
  • Bright, A. D., Manfredo, M. J., & Fulton, D. C. (2000). Segmenting the public: An application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 218–226.
  • Conover, M. R. (1998). Perceptions of American agricultural producers about wildlife on their farms and ranches. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 597–604.
  • Crank, R. D., Hygnstrom, S. E., Groepper, S. R., & Hams, K. M. (2010). Landowner attitudes toward elk management in the Pine Ridge region of northwestern Nebraska. Human-Wildlife Interactions, 4, 67–76.
  • Daigle, J. J., Hrubes, D., & Ajzen, I. (2002). A comparative study of beliefs, attitudes, and values among hunters, wildlife viewers, and other outdoor recreationists. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 1–19. doi:10.1080/108712002753574756
  • Daley, S. S., Cobb, D. T., Bromley, P. T., & Sorenson, C. E. (2004). Landowner attitudes regarding wildlife management on private land in North Carolina. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32, 209–219. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[209:LARWMO]2.0.CO;2
  • Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Danmarks Statistik. (2012). Landbrug 2012. Statistik om landbrug, gartneri og skovbrug. [Agricultural Statistics 2011]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Statistics Denmark.
  • Danmarks Statistik. (2015). Statistisk Årbog 2015. [Statistical Yearbook 2015]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Statistics Denmark.
  • Decker, D. J., Brown, T. L., & Siemer, W. F. (2001). Human dimensions of wildlife management in North America. Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society.
  • Dougherty, E. M., Fulton, D. C., & Anderson, D. H. (2003). The influence of gender on the relationship between wildlife value orientations, beliefs, and the acceptability of lethal deer control in Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 603–623. doi:10.1080/08941920309187
  • Dubois, S., & Fraser, D. (2013). Rating harms to wildlife: A survey showing convergence between conservation and animal welfare views. Animal Welfare, 22, 49–55. doi:10.7120/09627286.22.1.049
  • Ford, R. M., Williams, K. J. H., Smith, E. L., & Bishop, I. D. (2014). Beauty, belief, and trust: Toward a model of psychological processes in public acceptance of forest management. Environment and Behavior, 46, 476–506. doi:10.1177/0013916512456023
  • Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1, 24–47. doi:10.1080/10871209609359060
  • Gamborg, C., & Jensen, F. S. (2016). Wildlife value orientations: A quantitative study of the general public in Denmark. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 21, 34–46. doi:10.1080/10871209.2015.1098753
  • Gamborg, C., Palmer, C., & Sandøe, P. (2012). Ethics of wildlife management and conservation: What should we try to protect? Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10), 8.
  • Golden, K. E., Peterson, M. N., DePerno, C. S., Bardon, R. E., & Moorman, C. E. (2013). Factors shaping private landowner engagement in wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 37, 94–100. doi:10.1002/wsb.235
  • Ives, C. D., & Kendal, D. (2014). The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 67–72. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013
  • Jensen, F. S. (1993). Landscape managers’ and politicians’ perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the population. Forest & Landscape Research, 1, 79–93.
  • Kaltenborn, B. P., Bjerke, T., & Vitterso, J. (1999). Attitudes toward large carnivores among sheep farmers, wildlife managers and research biologists in Norway. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 4, 57–73. doi:10.1080/10871209909359157
  • Kaspersen, L. B., & Ottesen, L. (2001). Associationalism for 150 years and still alive and kicking: Some reflections on Danish civil society. In P. Q. Hirst & V. M. Bader (Eds.), Associative democracy: The real third way (pp. 105–130). New York, NY: Frank Cass Publishers.
  • Kellert, S. R. (1978). Attitudes and characteristics of hunters and antihunters. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 43, 412–423.
  • Kellert, S. R. (1984). Wildlife values and the private landowner. American Forests, 90(27–28), 60–61.
  • Kings, D., & Ilbery, B. (2015). The lifeworlds of organic and conventional farmers in central-southern England: A phenomenological enquiry. Sociologia Ruralis, 55, 62–84. doi:10.1111/soru.12047
  • Lund, V., Hemlin, S., & White, J. (2004). Natural behavior, animal rights, or making money a study of Swedish organic farmers’ view of animal issues. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 17, 157–179. doi:10.1023/B:JAGE.0000017393.31486.c2
  • Lute, M. L., Bump, A., & Gore, M. L. (2014). Identity-driven differences in stakeholder concerns about hunting wolves. PLoS One, 9(12), e114460. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114460.
  • Madden, F., & McQuinn, B. (2015). Conservation conflict transformation: The missing link in conservation. In S. Redpath, R. J. Gutiérrez, K. A. Wood, & J. C. Young (Eds.), Conflicts in conservation. Navigating towards solutions (pp. 257–267). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Manfredo, M., Teel, T., & Bright, A. (2003). Why are public values toward wildlife changing? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8, 287–306. doi:10.1080/716100425
  • Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., & Decker, D. (1995). Human dimensions of wildlife management: Basic concepts. In R. L. Knight & K. J. Gutzwiller (Eds.), Wildlife and recreationists: Coexistence through management and research (pp. 17–31). Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
  • McKetta, C., & Bolon, N. (1990). Idaho landowner attitudes on hunting and hunters. Focus on Renewable Natural Resources, 15, 3–4.
  • Miller, K. K. (2003). Public and stakeholder values of wildlife in Victoria, Australia. Wildlife Research, 30, 465–476. doi:10.1071/WR02007
  • Miller, K. K. (2009). Human dimensions of wildlife population management in Australasia—History, approaches and directions. Wildlife Research, 36, 48–56. doi:10.1071/WR08006
  • Mustin, K., Newey, S., Irvine, J., Arroyo, B., & Redpath, S. (2012). Biodiversity impacts of game bird hunting and associated management practices in Europe and North America. Report. Edinburgh, Scotland: James Hutton Institute.
  • Peterson, M. N., DePerno, C. S., Moorman, C. E., Cunningham, K. A., Milrad, J. P., Riddle, J. D., & Steelman, T. A. (2009). Hunting and non-hunting college student’s perceptions of wildlife and each other. Proceedings Annual Conference Southeastern Association Fish and Wildlife Agencies, 63, 47–53.
  • Pound, D. (2015). Designing and facilitating consensus-building—Keys to success. In S. Redpath, R. J. Gutiérrez, K. A. Wood, & J. C. Young (Eds.), Conflicts in conservation. Navigating towards solutions (pp. 240–253). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Radder, L., & Bech-Larsen, T. (2008). Hunters’ motivations and values: A South African perspective. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International Journal, 13, 252–262. doi:10.1080/10871200801986739
  • Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137–182. doi:10.1163/156913306778667357
  • Sharp, R., & Wollscheid, K.-U. (2009). An overview of recreational hunting in North America, Europe and Australia. In B. Dickson, J. Hutton, & W. M. Adams (Eds.), Recreational hunting, conservation and rural livelihoods: Science and practice (pp. 25–38). London, England: Blackwell.
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  • Teel, T., Dayer, A., Manfredo, M., & Bright, A. (2005). Regional results from the research project entitled “Wildlife Values in the West.” (Project Rep. No. 58). Project Report for the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit.
  • Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. J. (2009). Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology, 24, 128–139. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01374.x
  • Vandervell, A., & Coles, C. (1980). Game & the english landscape. The influence of the chase on sporting art and scenery. London, England: Debrett’s Peerage.
  • Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly, M. P. (1999). A value-attitude-behaviour model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 523–537. doi:10.1080/089419299279425
  • Vaske, J. J., Jacobs, M. H., & Sijtsma, T. J. (2011). Wildlife value orientations and demographics in the Netherlands. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 57, 1179–1187. doi:10.1007/s10344-011-0531-0
  • Zinn, H. C. (2003). Hunting and sociodemographic trends: Older hunters from Pennsylvania and Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31, 1004–1014.
  • Zinn, H. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Barro, S. C. (2002). Patterns of wildlife value orientations in hunters’ families. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 147–162. doi:10.1080/10871200260293324

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.