Amenity or Nuisance? Understanding and Managing Human–Panther Conflicts in Exurban Southwest Florida

References

• Adams Knopff, A., Knopff, K., & St Clair, C. C. (2016). Tolerance for cougars diminished by high perception of risk. Ecology and Society, 21(4). doi:10.5751/ES-08933-210433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basit, T. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143–154. doi:10.1080/0013188032000133548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruskotter, J. T., Vaske, J. J., & Schmidt, R. H. (2009). Social and cognitive correlates of Utah residents’ acceptance of the lethal control of wolves. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14(2), 119–132. doi:10.1080/10871200802712571
   Google Scholar
• Bruskotter, J. T., & Wilson, R. S. (2014). Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conservation Letters, 7(3), 158–165. doi:10.1111/conl.2014.7.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analyzing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11(6), 461–466. doi:10.1016/0260-6917(91)90009-Y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter, N. H., Riley, S. J., & Liu, J. (2012). Utility of a psychological framework for carnivore conservation. Oryx, 46(04), 525–535. doi:10.1017/S0030605312000245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13(5), 458–466. doi:10.1111/acv.2010.13.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Revenue. (2014). Florida Parcel Data by County—2014. Downloadable Data. Tallahassee, FL. Retrieved from http://www.fgdl.org/metadataexplorer/explorer.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Frakes, R. A., Belden, R. C., Wood, B. E., & James, F. E. (2015). Landscape analysis of adult Florida panther habitat. PLoS One, 10(7), e0133044. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangaas, K. E., Kaltenborn, B. P., & Andreassen, H. P. (2015). Environmental attitudes associated with large-scale cultural differences, not local environmental conflicts. Environmental Conservation, 42(01), 41–50. doi:10.1017/S0376892914000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. J., Knight, R. L., Marzluff, J. M., Powell, S., Brown, K., Gude, P. H., & Jones, K. (2005). Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecological Applications, 15(6), 1893–1905. doi:10.1890/05-5221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inskip, C., & Zimmermann, A. (2009). Human-felid conflict: A review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx, 43(01), 18–34. doi:10.1017/S003060530899030X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S. K., Langin, C., Carlton, J. S., & Kaid, L. L. (2012). Content analysis of newspaper coverage of the Florida panther. Conservation Biology, 26(1), 171–179. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01750.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., & Karlsson, J. (2011). Subjective experience of fear and the cognitive interpretation of large carnivores. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16(1), 15–29. doi:10.1080/10871209.2011.535240
   Google Scholar
• Kertson, B. N., Spencer, R. D., & Grue, C. E. (2013). Demographic influences on cougar residential use and interactions with people in western Washington. Journal of Mammalogy, 94(2), 269–281. doi:10.1644/12-MAMM-A-051.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreye, M. M., & Pienaar, E. F. (2015). A critical review of efforts to protect Florida panther habitat on private lands. Land Use Policy, 48, 428–436. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreye, M. M., Pienaar, E. F., & Adams, A. E. (2017). The role of community identity in cattlemen response to Florida panther recovery efforts. Society & Natural Resources, 30(1), 79–94. doi:10.1080/08941920.2016.1180730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Langin, C., & Jacobson, S. K. (2012). Risk and residency influences on public support for Florida panther recovery. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 36(4), 713–721. doi:10.1002/wsb.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnell, J. D., Swenson, J. E., & Anderson, R. (2001). Predators and people: Conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable. Animal Conservation, 4(4), 345–349. doi:10.1017/S1367943001001408
   Google Scholar
• Lischka, S. A., Riley, S. J., & Rudolph, B. A. (2008). Effects of impact perception on acceptance capacity for white‐tailed deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 72(2), 502–509. doi:10.2193/2007-117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maehr, D. S., Belden, R. C., Land, E. D., & Wilkins, L. (1990). Food habits of panthers in southwest Florida. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 54(3), 420–423. doi:10.2307/3809651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, B. T., Onorato, D. P., & Martin, J. (2015). Endangered Florida panther population size determined from public reports of motor vehicle collision mortalities. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(4), 893–901. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messmer, T. A. (2000). The emergence of human–wildlife conflict management: Turning challenges into opportunities. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 45(3), 97–102. doi:10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00045-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onorato, D., Belden, C., Cunningham, M., Land, D., McBride, R., & Roelke, M. (2010). Long-term research on the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi): Historical findings and future obstacles to population persistence. In David W. MacDonald and Andrew J. Loveridge (Eds.), Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids (pp. 453–469). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pienaar, E. F., Kreye, M. M., & Jacobs, C. (2015). Conflicts between cattlemen and the Florida panther: Insights and policy recommendations from interviews with Florida cattlemen. Human Ecology, 43(4), 577–588. doi:10.1007/s10745-015-9765-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, S. J., & Decker, D. J. (2000). Wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28(4), 931–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, K. Z. (2013). Panther politics: Neoliberalizing nature in Southwest Florida. Environment and Planning A, 45(10), 2323–2343. doi:10.1068/a45294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjölander-Lindqvist, A., Johansson, M., & Sandström, C. (2015). Individual and collective responses to large carnivore management: The roles of trust, representation, knowledge spheres, communication and leadership. Wildlife Biology, 21(3), 175–185. doi:10.2981/wlb.00065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagle, K., Zajac, R., Bruskotter, J., Wilson, R., & Prange, S. (2013). Building tolerance for bears: A communications experiment. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 77(4), 863–869. doi:10.1002/jwmg.v77.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagle, K. M., Bruskotter, J. T., & Wilson, R. S. (2012). The role of affect in public support and opposition to wolf management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 17(1), 44–57. doi:10.1080/10871209.2012.633237
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, C., & Quinn, M. S. (2010). Risk perceptions and attitudes toward cougars in the southern foothills of Alberta. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 15(5), 359–372. doi:10.1080/10871200903582626
   Google Scholar
• Zajac, R. M., Bruskotter, J. T., Wilson, R. S., & Prange, S. (2012). Learning to live with black bears: A psychological model of acceptance. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 76(7), 1331–1340. doi:10.1002/jwmg.v76.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, H. C., Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., & Wittmann, K. (1998). Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions. Society & Natural Resources, 11(7), 649–662. doi:10.1080/08941929809381109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar