641
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Applying Public Trust Thinking to Wildlife Governance in the United States: Challenges and Potential Solutions

, , , &

References

  • Addison, P. F. E., Cook, C. N., De Bie, K., & Bennett, J. (2016). Conservation practitioners’ perspectives on decision triggers for evidence-based management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53 (5), 1351–1357. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12734
  • AFWA. (2014). Wildlife management authority: The state agencies’ perspective. Washington, DC: Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies.
  • Arrow, K., Cropper, M., Gollier, C., Groom, B., Heal, G., Newell, R., … Weitzman, M. (2013). Determining benefits and costs for future generations. Science, 341, 349–350. doi:10.1126/science.1235665
  • Bean, M. J., & Rowland, M. J. (1997). The evolution of national wildlife law. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press International.
  • Bixler, R. P., Johnson, S., Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., Reuling, M., Curtin, C., … Grove, J. M. (2016). Networks and landscapes: A framework for setting goals and evaluating performance at the large landscape scale. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14 (3), 145–153. doi:10.1002/fee.1250
  • Blumm, M., & Guthrie, R. (2012). Internationalizing the public trust doctrine: Natural law and constitutional and statutory approaches to fulfilling the Saxion vision. UC Davis Law Review, 45, 741–808.
  • Blumm, M., & Paulsen, A. (2013). The public trust in wildlife. Utah Law Review, 6, 1437–1504.
  • Blumm, M., & Schaffer, L. (2015). The federal public trust doctrine: Misinterpreting justice kennedy and illinois central railroad. Environmental Law, 45 (2), 399–430.
  • Blumm, M., Wisehart, L., Stein, E., Brown, I., Guthrie, R., Smith, M., … Schaffer, L. (2014). The public trust doctrine in forty-five states (Lewis and Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper). Lewis & Clark Law School, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Blumm, M., & Wood, M. (2013). The public trust doctrine in environmental and natural resources law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • Bruskotter, J., Enzler, S., & Treves, A. (2011). Rescuing wolves from politics: Wildlife as a public trust resource. Science, 333, 1828–1829. doi:10.1126/science.1207803
  • Callicott, J. B. (1994). Earth’s insights: A multicultural survey of ecological ethics from the mediterranean basin to the Australian outback. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Chase, L. C., Decker, D. J., & Lauber, T. B. (2004). Public participation in wildlife management: What do stakeholders want?. Society & Natural Resources, 17 (7), 629–639. doi:10.1080/08941920490466611
  • Conroy, M. J., & Peterson, J. T. (2013). Decision making in natural resource management: A structured, adaptive approach. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Crowley, S. L., Hinchliffe, S., & Mcdonald, R. A. (2017). Conflict in invasive species management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15 (3), 133–141. doi:10.1002/fee.2017.15.issue-3
  • Decker, D. J., Forstchen, A. B., Organ, J. F., Smith, C. A., Riley, S. J., Jacobson, C. A., … Siemer, W. F. (2014). Impacts management: An approach to fulfilling public trust responsibilities of wildlife agencies. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 38, 2–8. doi:10.1002/wsb.380
  • Decker, D. J., Forstchen, A. B., Pomeranz, E. F., Smith, C. A., Riley, S. J., Jacobson, C. A., … Batcheller, G. R. (2015). Stakeholder engagement in wildlife management: Does the public trust doctrine imply limits?. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 79 (2), 174–179. doi:10.1002/jwmg.809
  • Decker, D. J., Schuler, K., Forstchen, A. B., Wild, M. A., & Siemer, W. F. (2016). Wildlife health and public trust responsibilities for wildlife resources. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 52 (4), 775–784. doi:10.7589/2016-03-066
  • Decker, D. J., Smith, C. A., Forstchen, A. B., Hare, D., Pomeranz, E. F., Doyle-Capitman, C., … Organ, J. F. (2016). Governance principles for wildlife conservation in the 21st century. Conservation Letters, 9 (4), 290–295. doi:10.1111/conl.12211
  • Diekmann, K. A., Samuels, S. M., Ross, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997). Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: Allocators versus recipients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (5), 1061–1074. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1061
  • Earle, T. C., & Siegrist, M. (2008). On the relation between trust and fairness in environmental risk management. Risk Analysis, 28 (5), 1395–1413. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01091.x
  • Epstein, R. A. (2016). Property rights and governance strategies; how best to deal with land, water, intellectual property, and spectrum. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 14 (2), 181–218.
  • Feldpausch-Parker, A. M., Parker, I. D., & Vidon, E. S. (2017). Privileging consumptive use: A critique of ideology, power, and discourse in the North American model of wildlife conservation. Conservation and Society, 15 (1), 33–40. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.201395
  • Ferranto, S., Huntsinger, L., Getz, C., Lahiff, M., Stewart, W., Nakamura, G., & Kelly, M. (2013). Management without borders? A survey of landowner practices and attitudes toward cross-boundary cooperation. Society & Natural Resources, 26 (9), 1082–1100. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.779343
  • Forstchen, A. B., & Smith, C. A. (2014). The essential role of human dimensions and stakeholder participation in states’ fulfillment of public trust responsibilities. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19 (5), 417–426. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.940561
  • Frank, K. I. (2006). The potential of youth participation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20 (4), 351–371.
  • Freyfogle, E. T., & Goble, D. D. (2009). Wildlife law: A primer. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Gill, B. B. (1996). The wildlife professional subculture: The case of the crazy aunt. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1 (1), 60–69. doi:10.1080/10871209609359052
  • Goldman, R. L., Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., & Daily, G. C. (2008). Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (27), 9445–9448. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800208105
  • Gosseries, A. (2008). On future generations’ future rights. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16 (4), 446–474. doi:10.1111/jopp.2008.16.issue-4
  • Hare, D., & Blossey, B. (2014). Principles of public trust thinking. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19 (5), 397–406. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.942759
  • Hauser, O. P., Rand, D. G., Peysakhovich, A., & Nowak, M. A. (2014). Cooperating with the future. Nature, 511 (7508), 220–223. doi:10.1038/nature13530
  • Hilty, J., & Merenlender, A. M. (2003). Studying biodiversity on private lands. Conservation Biology, 17 (1), 132–137. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01361.x
  • Horner, S. (2000). Embryo, not fossil: breathing life into the public trust in wildlife. Land & Water Law Review, 35, 23–75.
  • Iftekhar, M. S., & Pannell, D. J. (2015). “Biases” in adaptive natural resource management. Conservation Letters, 8 (6), 388–396. doi:10.1111/conl.12189
  • Jacobson, C. A., & Decker, D. J. (2008). Governance of state wildlife management: reform and revive or resist and retrench? Society & Natural Resources, 21 (5), 441–448. doi:10.1080/08941920801898465
  • Jacobson, C. A., Decker, D. J., & Carpenter, L. (2007). Securing alternative funding for wildlife management: insights from agency leaders. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 71 (6), 2106–2113. doi:10.2193/2006-442
  • Jacobson, C. A., & Haubold, E. M. (2014). Landscape conservation cooperatives: Building a network to help fulfill public trust obligations. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19 (5), 427–436. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.942760
  • Jacobson, C. A., Organ, J. F., Decker, D. J., Batcheller, G. R., & Carpenter, L. (2010). A conservation institution for the 21st century: Implications for state wildlife agencies. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74 (2), 203–209. doi:10.2193/2008-485
  • Jenkins, C. N., Houtan, K. S., Van, Pimm, S. L., & Sexton, J. O. (2015). US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 (16), 5081–5086. doi:10.1073/pnas.1418034112
  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 193–206. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193
  • Klijn, E. H., & Edelenbos, J. (2013). The influence of democratic legitimacy on outcomes in governance networks. Administration & Society, 45 (6), 627–650. doi:10.1177/0095399712454113
  • Knight, R. L., & Landres, P. B. (2013). Stewardship across boundaries. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Kretser, H. E., Glennon, M. J., & Smith, Z. (2014). NGOs enhance state wildlife agencies’ capacity to meet public trust doctrine obligations. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19 (5), 437–447. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.939315
  • Kretser, H. E., Schiavone, M. V., Hare, D., & Smith, C. A. (2017). Applying wildlife governance principles: opportunities and limitations. Transactions of the 81st North American wildlife and natural resources conference, In press.
  • Lauber, T. B., Connelly, N. A., Niederdeppe, J., & Knuth, B. A. (2014). Collaborative management and public trust responsibilities: A help or a hindrance?. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19 (5), 458–468. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.936067
  • Matthews, H. (2001). Participatory structures and the youth of today: Engaging those who are hardest to reach. Ethics, Place and Environment, 4 (2), 153–159. doi:10.1080/13668790123594
  • Meyers, G. (1989). Variation on a theme: Expanding the public trust doctrine to include protection of wildlife. Environmental Law, 19, 723–735.
  • Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). How can decision making be improved?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4 (4), 379–383. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01142.x
  • Nie, M. (2004). State wildlife policy and management: The scope and bias of political conflict. Public Administration Review, 64 (2), 221–233. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-2
  • Oehler, J. D. (2003). State efforts to promote early-successional habitats on public and private lands in the northeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 185 (1–2), 169–177. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00253-6
  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Peterson, M. N., & Nelson, M. P. (2016). Why the North American model of wildlife conservation is problematic for modern wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22 (1), 43–54.
  • Pomeranz, E. F., Decker, D. J., Siemer, W. F., Kirsch, A., Hurst, J., & Farquhar, J. (2014). Challenges for multilevel stakeholder engagement in public trust resource governance. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19 (5), 448–457. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.936069
  • Proctor, W., & Drechsler, M. (2006). Deliberative multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24 (2), 169–190. doi:10.1068/c22s
  • Raymond, L., & Olive, A. (2008). Landowner beliefs regarding biodiversity protection on private property: An Indiana case study. Society & Natural Resources, 21 (6), 483–497. doi:10.1080/08941920801905203
  • Redmond, P. (2009). The public trust in wildlife: Two steps forward, two steps back. Natural Resources Journal, 49, 249–312.
  • Rissman, A. R. (2013). Rethinking property rights: Comparative analysis of conservation easements for wildlife conservation. Environmental Conservation, 40 (3), 222–230. doi:10.1017/S0376892913000015
  • Rodgers, W. A., Wood, M. C., Chemerinsky, E., Blumm, M., Davidson, J., Torres, G., … Grant, D. L. (2013). Brief of Law Professors as Amicus Curiae, USCA Case #13-5192 Document #1467085, Alec L. v. Gina McCarthy, Case No. 11-cv-02235 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
  • Rudolph, B. A., & Riley, S. J. (2014). Factors affecting hunters’ trust and cooperation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19 (5), 469–479. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.939314
  • Sagarin, R. D., & Turnipseed, M. (2012). The public trust doctrine: Where ecology meets natural resources management. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37 (1), 473–496. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-031411-165249
  • Sagoff, M. (1988). The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sand, P. H. (2014). The rise of public trusteeship in international environmental law. Environmental Policy and Law, 44 (1–2), 210–218.
  • Sax, J. L. (1970). The public trust doctrine in natural resource law: Effective judicial intervention. Michigan Law Review, 68 (3), 471–566. doi:10.2307/1287556
  • Scott, A. (1999). Trust law, sustainability, and responsible action. Ecological Economics, 31 (1), 139–154. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00054-3
  • Smith, C. A. (2011). The role of state wildlife professionals under the public trust doctrine. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 75 (7), 1539–1543. doi:10.1002/jwmg.v75.7
  • Soulé, M. E. (1985). What is Conservation Biology? A new synthetic discipline addresses the dynamics and problems of perturbed and ecosystems. BioScience, 35 (11), 727–734. doi:10.2307/1310054
  • Takacs, D. (2008). The public trust doctrine, environmental human rights, and the future of private property. NYU Environmental Law Journal, 16, 711–765.
  • Thomas, C. W. (1998). Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration & Society, 30 (2), 166–193. doi:10.1177/0095399798302003
  • Torres, G., & Bellinger, N. (2014). The public trust: The law’s DNA. Wake Forest Journal of Law and Policy, 4 (2), 281–317.
  • Treves, A., Chapron, G., López-Bao, J. V., Shoemaker, C., Goeckner, A. O., & Bruskotter, J. (2017). Predators and the Public Trust. Biological Reviews, 92, 248–270. doi:10.1111/brv.12227
  • Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (4), 745–760. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq092
  • Vernon, M. E., & Clark, S. G. (2016). Addressing a persistent policy problem: The elk hunt in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Society & Natural Resources, 29 (7), 836–851. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1080337
  • Vucetich, J. A., Bruskotter, J. T., Nelson, M. P., Peterson, R. O., & Bump, J. K. (2017). Evaluating the principles of wildlife conservation: A case study of wolf (Canis lupus) hunting in Michigan, United States. Journal of Mammalogy, 98 (1), 53–64. doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyw151
  • Weiss, E. B. (1992). In fairness to future generations and sustainable development. American University Journal of International Law and Policy, 8, 19–26.
  • Wilkinson, C. F. (1988). The headwaters of the public trust: Some thoughts on the source and scope of the traditional doctrine. Environmental Law, 19, 425–472.
  • Williamson, S. J. (1998). Origins, history, and current use of ballot initiatives in wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management, 3 (2), 51–59. doi:10.1080/10871209809359125
  • Wood, M. (2004). Protecting the wildlife trust: A reinterpretation of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Environmental Law, 34, 605.
  • Wood, M. (2013). Nature’s trust: environmental law for a new ecological age. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wood, M. (2014). Tribal environmental leaders summit keynote address: Tribal trustees in climate crisis. American Indian Law Journal, 2 (2), 1–27.
  • Zakaras, A. (2016). Democracy, children, and the environment: A case for commons trusts. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 19 (2), 141–162. doi:10.1080/13698230.2014.968387

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.