Mitigating infrastructure loss from beaver flooding: A cost–benefit analysis

References

• Alberta Municipal Affairs (AMA). (2016, July 21). Municipalities and Communities. Retrieved from http://www.municipalaffairs.alberta.ca/municipalities-and-communities
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, B. L. (1999). Cumulative effects on wetland landscapes: Links to wetland restoration in the United States and southern Canada. Wetlands, 19(4), 775–788. doi:10.1007/BF03161784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, B. J., Arias, L. C., Davidson, A. D., Ferguson, A. W., Randa, L. A., & Sheffield, S. R. (2014). Licence to kill: Reforming federal wildlife control to restore biodiversity and ecosystem function. Conservation Letters, 7(2), 131–142. doi:10.1111/conl.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyles, S. L., & Savitzky, B. A. (2008). An analysis of the efficacy and comparative costs of using flow devices to resolve conflicts with North American beavers along roadways in the coastal plain of Virginia. Proceedings 23rd Vertebrate Pest Conference, 23, 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, M. (2003). Beaver management study. Association of Massachusetts Wetlands Scientists Newsletter, 44, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, M. (2005). Best management practices for beaver problems. Association of Massachusetts Wetland Scientists Newsletter, April(53), 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Champ, P. A., & Bishop, R. D. (2006). Is willingness to pay for public good sensitive to the elicitation format? Land Economics, 82(2), 162–173. doi:10.3368/le.82.2.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., De Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van Der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., … Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeStefano, S., & Deblinger, R. D. (2005). Wildlife as valuable natural resources vs. intolerable pests: A suburban wildlife management model. Urban Ecosystems, 8, 179–190. doi:10.1007/s11252-005-4379-5
   Google Scholar
• Erwin, K. L. (2009). Wetlands and global climate change: The role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetland Ecology and Management, 17, 71–84. doi:10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, D. J., & Quigley, J. T. (2005). No net loss of fish habitat: A review and analysis of habitat compensation in Canada. Environmental Management, 36(3), 343–355. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0114-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, G. A., & Bayley, S. E. (2008). Beaver (Castor canadensis) mitigate the effects of climate on the area of open water in boreal wetlands in western Canada. Biological Conservation, 141, 556–567. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, G. A., & Larson, D. G. (2014). Beaver-created habitat heterogeneity influences aquatic invertebrate assemblages in boreal Canada. Wetlands, 34, 19–29. doi:10.1007/s13157-013-0476-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, G. A., & Larson, D. G. (2015). Ecological engineering and aquatic connectivity: A new perspective from beaver-modified wetlands. Freshwater Biology, 60, 198–208. doi:10.1111/fwb.2014.60.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, P. G., Curtis, P. D., Lehnert, M. E., & Hamelin, D. L. (2001). Habitat and structural factors influencing beaver interference with highway culverts. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29(2), 654–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonker, S. A., Muth, R. M., Organ, J. F., Zwick, R. R., & Siemer, W. F. (2006). Experiences with beaver damage and attitudes of Massachusetts residents towards beaver. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34(4), 1009–1021. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1009:EWBDAA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W. J., An, S., Finlayson, C. M., Gopal, B., Kvêt, J., Mitchell, S. A., … Robarts, R. D. (2013). Current state of knowledge regarding the world’s wetlands and their future under global climate change: A synthesis. Aquatic Sciences, 75, 151–167. doi:10.1007/s00027-012-0278-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laramie, H. A. (1963). A device for control of problem beavers. Journal of Wildlife Management, 27(3), 471–476. doi:10.2307/3798522
   Google Scholar
• Law, A., McLean, F., & Willby, N. J. (2016). Habitat engineering by beaver benifits aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem processes in agricultural streams. Freshwater Biology, 61, 486–499. doi:10.1111/fwb.12721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisle, S. (2003). The use and potential of flow devices in beaver management. Lutra, 46(2), 211–216.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, R. C. (2001). A visible hand? Bond markets, political parties, balanced budget laws, and state government debt. Economics and Politics, 13(1), 49–72. doi:10.1111/ecpo.2001.13.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Mensing, D. M., Galatowitsch, S. M., & Tester, J. R. (1998). Anthropogenic effects on the biodiversity of riparian wetlands of a northern temperate landscape. Journal of Environmental Management, 53, 349–377. doi:10.1006/jema.1998.0215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte, D. L., Swafford, S. R., & Sloan, C. A. (2000). Survey of factors affecting the success of Clemson beaver pond levelers installed in Mississippi by Wildlife Services. Proceedings of the Ninth Wildlife Damage Conference, 21, 120–125.
   Google Scholar
• Oerlemans Leon, A. G., Chan, K.-Y., & Volschenk, J. (2016). Willingness to pay for green electricity: A review of contingent valuation literature and its sources of error. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 66, 875–885. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, R. D., Schulze, W. D., & Breffle, W. S. (1996). A test for payment card biases. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 178–185. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubec, C. D. A., & Hanson, A. R. (2009). Wetland mitigation and compensation: Canadian experience. Wetland Ecology and Management, 17, 3–14. doi:10.1007/s11273-008-9078-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhi, A., Boix, D., Gascón, S., Sala, J., & Quintana, X. D. (2013). Nestedness and successional trajectories of macroinvertebrate assemblages in man-made wetlands. Oecologia, 171(2), 545–556. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2440-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. W., & Donahue, W. F. (2006). An impending water crisis in Canada’s western prairie provinces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 7210–7216. doi:10.1073/pnas.0601568103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemer, W. F., Jonker, S. A., & Brown, T. L. (2004). Attitudes toward beaver and norms about beaver management: Insights from baseline research in New York. Ithaca, NY: HDRU Publ. 04–05. Department of Natural Resources, New York State College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, L. (2006). Solving beaver flooding problems through the use of water flow control devices. Proceedings 22nd Vertebrate Pest Conference, 22, 74–180.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. D., & Singleton, R. D. (2014). The evolution of flow devices used to reduce flooding by beavers: A review. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 38(1), 127–133. doi:10.1002/wsb.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam, L. (2004). The contingent valuation model: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(1), 89–124. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00138-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook, C. J., Cooper, D. J., & Baker, B. W. (2006). Beaver dams and overbank floods influence groundwater–Surface water interactions of a Rocky Mountain riparian area. Water Resources Research, 42. doi:10.1029/2005WR004560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. P., Jones, C. G., & Flecker, A. S. (2002). An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia, 132, 96–101. doi:10.1007/s00442-002-0929-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedler, J. B., & Kercher, S. (2005). Wetland resources: Status, ecosystem services, degradation, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 39–74. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar