Perceptions of Whooping Cranes among waterfowl hunters in Alabama: using specialization, awareness, knowledge, and attitudes to understand conservation behavior

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bath, A. (1998). The role of human dimensions in wildlife resource research in wildlife management. Ursus, 10, 349–355.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen. Journal of Leisure Research, 9, 174–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C., Larson, L., Dayer, A., Stedman, R., & Decker, D. (2015). Are wildlife recreationists conservationists? Linking hunting, birdwatching, and pro-environmental behavior. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 79, 446–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D., & Smyth, J. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1, 24–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hammitt, W. E., Knauf, L. R., & Noe, F. P. (1989). A comparison of user vs. researcher determined level of past experience on recreation preference. Journal of Leisure Research, 21, 202–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartel, C. M., Carlton, J. S., & Prokopy, L. S. (2015). The role of value orientations and experience on attitudes toward a well-liked threatened reptile. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20(6), 553–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T. A. (2012). Navigating environmental attitudes. Conservation Biology, 26, 583–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, A. E., Reed, M., & Davis, S. K. (2014). Voluntary stewardship and the Canadian Species at Risk Act: Exploring rancher willingness to support species at risk in the Canadian prairies. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hvenegaard, G. T. (2002). Birder specialization differences in conservation involvement, demographics, and motivations. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S. K., & McDuff, M. (1998). Training idiot savants: The lack of human dimensions in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 12(2), 263–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhamvar-Shingote, R., & Schuett, M. A. (2013). The predators of Junnar: Local peoples’ knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes toward leopards and leopard conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 18(1), 32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kareiva, P., & Marvier, M. (2012). What is conservation science? Bioscience, 62, 962–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1985). Birdwatching in American society. Leisure Sciences, 7, 343–360.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1993). Attitudes, knowledge, and behavior toward wildlife among the industrial superpowers: United States, Japan, and Germany. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1994). Public attitudes toward bears and their conservation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Bear Research and Management, 9, 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kuentzel, W. F., & Heberlein, T. A. (1992). Does specialization affect behavioral choices and quality judgements among hunters? Leisure Sciences, 14, 211–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuentzel, W. F., & McDonald, C. D. (1992). Differential effects of past experience, commitment, and lifestyle dimensions on river use specialization. Journal of Leisure Research, 24, 269–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Scott, D. (2004). Measuring birthing specialization: A confirmatory factor analysis. Leisure Sciences, 26, 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, T. (2011). Second whooping crane found dead at Weiss Lake, Alabama. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Retrieved from http://www.bringbackthecranes.org/newsroom/2011/nr18February2011.html
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., Brown, P. J., Decker, D. J., & Duke, E. A. (2009). Wildlife and society: The science of human dimensions. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, B. L. (1994). Specialization and motivation of birdwatchers. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 22, 361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, B. L. (1996). Socialization influences of specialization among birdwatchers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(1), 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, B. L., & Boxall, P. C. (1996). Participation in wildlife conservation by birdwatchers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Messmer, T. A. (2000). The emergence of human-wildlife conflict management: Turning challenges into opportunities. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 45, 97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Hill, R., Smith, J. W., Reimer, A., Mase, A. S., Mullendore, N., Mulvaney, K. K., & Prokopy, L. S. (2014). The influence of basic beliefs and object-specific attitudes on behavioural intentions towards a rare and little-known amphibian. Wildlife Research, 41, 287–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A. (2000). A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters, 11, 261–275.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, K. G., Decker, D. J., & Brown, T. L. (1983). Identifying the attitudinal basis for “Bureau of Wildlife/Wildlife Interest Group” perceptual disparity in wildlife value attributes (Outdoor recreation research unit report 83-2). Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources, Outdoor Recreation Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, S. J., Decker, D. J., Carpenter, L. H., Organ, J. F., Siemer, W. F., Mattfeld, G. F., & Parsons, G. (2002). The essence of wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30, 585–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D., Ditton, R. B., Stoll, J. R., & Eubanks, T. D., Jr. (2005). Measuring specialization among birders: Utility of a self-classification measure. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10(1), 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & Shafer, C. S. (2001). Recreational specialization: A critical look at the construct. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 319–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & Thigpen, J. (2003). Understanding the birder as tourist: Segmenting visitors to the Texas Hummer/Bird Celebration. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8, 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. J. (2009). Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology, 24(1), 128–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisl, M. F., & O’Brien, K. (2003). Who cares and who acts? Outdoor recreationists exhibit different levels of environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 35, 506–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trick, J., Smith, J., Stehn, T., & Walker, L. (2001). Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Establishment of an experimental nonessential population of Whooping Cranes in the eastern United States. Federal Register, 66, 33903–33917.
   Google Scholar
• United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (2013). Birding in the United States: A demographic and economic analysis (Report 2011-1). U.S. Washington, D.C., USA: Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanek, R. P., & Lewis, J. C. (2015). Whooping Crane (Grus americana). In: A. Poole (Ed.), The birds of North America Online. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/153
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly, M. P. (1999). A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society & Natural Resources, 12, 523–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, D., Vaske, J. J., & Manfredo, M. J. (2006). Specificity and the cognitive hierarchy: Value orientations and the acceptability of urban wildlife management actions. Society & Natural Resources, 19, 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar