Factors impacting hunter access to private lands in southeast Minnesota

References

• Brown, T. L., Decker, D. J., & Kelley, J. W. (1984). Access to private lands for hunting in New York: 1963–1980. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 12, 344–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., Decker, D. J., Riley, S. J., Enck, J. W., Lauber, T. B., Curtis, P. D., & Mattfeld, G. F. (2000). The future of hunting as a mechanism to control white-tailed deer populations. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 797–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffel, R. A., & Craven, S. R. (2000). Attitudes of woodland owners toward white-tailed deer and herbivory in Wisconsin. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 227–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, M. R. (2001). Effect of hunting and trapping on wildlife damage. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29, 521–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordell, H. K., Bergstrom, J. C., Teasley, R. J., & Maetzold, J. A. (1998). Trends in outdoor recreation and implications for private land management in the East. In: Proceedings of the Natural Resources Income Opportunities for Private Lands Conference (pp. 4–10). College Park, MD: University of Maryland Cooperative Extension Service.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, P. D., Moen, A. N., Enck, J. W., Riley, S. J., Decker, D. J., & Mattfield, G. F. (2000). Can white-tailed deer be managed at the landscape level using traditional hunter harvest? Publication 00–4. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., & Brown, T. L. (1979). Hunting in New York: Participation, demand, and land access. New York Fish and Game Journal, 26, 101–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Y., & Munn, I. A. (2015). Eyes on landowner concerns: How do landowner concerns about fee hunting impact their willingness to lease? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20, 220–237. doi:10.1080/10871209.2015.1005854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, D. R., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., Stedman, R., Swope, C. B., Zinn, H. C., & San Julian, G. J. (2005). Bear and deer hunter density and distribution on public land in Pennsylvania. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10, 201–212. doi:10.1080/10871200591003445
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. 3rd edition. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fieberg, J., Cornicelli, L., Fulton, D. C., & Grund, M. D. (2010). Design and analysis of simple choice surveys for natural resource management. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 871–879. doi:10.2193/2009-030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramann, J. H., Albrecht, D. E., Bonnicksen, T. M., & Kurtz, W. B. (1985). Recreational access to private forests: The impact of hobby farming and exclusivity. Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 234–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel, T. M., Gates, C. C., & Eslinger, D. (2009). The geography of conflict between elk and agricultural values in the Cypress Hills, Canada. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 222–235. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagnow, C. P., Luloff, A. E., Finley, J. C., & San Julian, G. (2008). Private land access and deer management in three Pennsylvania counties: Key informants’ perspectives. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13, 102–114. doi:10.1080/10871200701882533
   Google Scholar
• Jagnow, C. P., Stedman, R. C., Luloff, A. E., San Julian, G. J., Finley, J. C., & Steele, J. (2006). Why landowners in Pennsylvania post their property against hunting. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11, 15–26. doi:10.1080/10871200500470944
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, J. R., Jamtgaard, K., Riggle, L., & Hayes, T. (1993). Impacts of big game on private land in south-western Montana: Landowner perceptions. Journal of Range Management, 46, 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lauber, T. B., & Brown, T. L. (2000). Hunting access on private lands in Dutchess County. Human Dimensions Research Unit Series No. 001–12. Ithaca, NY: Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• McInenly, L. (2013). 2012 Minnesota deer harvest report. In 2012 Hunting harvest statistics (pp. 63–105). St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, P. D., Heinzen, D., Mielke, M. E., Woodall, C. W., Butler, B. J., Piva, R. J., … Barnett, C. J. (2011). Minnesota’s forests 2008. Bulletin NRS-50. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhananga, A., Davenport, M., & Cornicelli, L. (2013). 2012 survey of deer management on private lands in southeast Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology and Department of Forest Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2015). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych. Version = 1.5.4
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., & Cornicelli, L. (2013). Surveys of hunters participating in the 2012 3A and 3B firearm deer seasons. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, S. A., Kilgore, M. A., Taff, S. J., & Schertz, J. M. (2008). Estimating a family forest landowner’s likelihood of posting against trespass. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 25, 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, S. A., Kilgore, M. A., Taff, S. J., & Schertz, J. M. (2009). Does forest land posted against trespass really mean no hunter access? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14, 251–264.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman, R. C., Bhandari, P., Luloff, A. E., Diefenbach, D. R., & Finley, J. C. (2008). Deer hunting on Pennsylvania’s public and private lands: A two-tiered system of hunters? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13, 222–233.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2017, July 11). American Fact Finder. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). 2011 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation – Minnesota
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). 2011 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation
   Google Scholar
• Wildlife Management Institute. (1983). Improving access to private land: A path to wildlife. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, A., & Roseberry, J. L. (1998). Deer management: Our profession’s symbol of success or failure? Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 515–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. A., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (1988). Modeling rural landowners’ hunter access policies in East Texas, USA. Environmental Management, 12, 229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. A., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (1990). A factor analytic study of attitudinal structure and its impact on rural landowners’ access policies. Environmental Management, 14, 269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. A., Kaiser, R. A., & Fletcher, J. E. (1988). Hunter access decisions by rural landowners: An east Texas example. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16, 152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. A., Kaiser, R. A., & Nicholls, S. (2002). Rural landowner liability for recreational injuries: Myths, perceptions, and realities. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57, 183–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar