Exploring stakeholder communication within a caribou hunting system of Arctic Alaska

References

• Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2007). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10, 1251–1262. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Board of Game. (2017, January–February). Arctic/Western & Interior region proposal book. Retrieved from www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=gameboard.proposalbook&boardcycle=2016-2017
   Google Scholar
• Brinkman, T. (2018). Hunter acceptance of antlerless moose harvest in Alaska: Importance of agency trust, proximity of hunter residence to hunting area, and hunting experience. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23, 129–145. doi:10.1080/10871209.2017.1399486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, R., & Whitten, K. (1979). Seasonal movements and sexual segregation of caribou determined by aerial survey. Journal of Wildlife Management, 43, 626–633. doi:10.2307/3808740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., & Mackay, K. (2009). Communicating the role of hunting for wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14, 21–36. doi:10.1080/10871200802545781
   Google Scholar
• Chase, L., Siemer, W., & Decker, D. (2002). Designing stakeholder involvement strategies to resolve wildlife management controversies. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30, 937–950. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/3784250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornicelli, L., Fulton, D., Grund, M., & Fieberg, J. (2011). Hunter perceptions and acceptance of alternative deer management regulations. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 35, 323–329. doi:10.1002/wsb.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Subsistence Management Program. (2019). Federal subsistence management regulations for the harvest of wildlife on federal public lands in Alaska. Retrieved from www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/2018-20_wildlife_regs_book_final_web_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fleegle, J., Rosenberry, C., & Wallingford, B. (2013). Use of citizen advisory committees to direct deer management in Pennsylvania. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 37, 129–136. doi:10.1002/wsb.227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgaard, S., Eythórsson, E., & Tombre, I. (2018). Hunter opinions on the management of migratory geese: A case of stakeholder involvement in adaptive harvest management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23, 284–292. doi:10.1080/10871209.2018.1424269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, H., Brown-Schwalenberg, P., Frost, K., Fernandez-Gimenez, M., Norton, D., & Rosenberg, D. (2002). Observations on the workshop as a means of improving communication between holders of traditional and scientific knowledge. Environmental Management, 30, 778–792. doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2749-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, H., Callaghan, T., Fox, S., & Krupnik, I. (2004). Matching traditional and scientific observations to detect environmental change: A discussion on arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Ambio Special Report, 18–23. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/25094583
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M., Vaske, J., & Sijtsma, M. (2014). Predictive potential of wildlife value orientations for acceptability of management interventions. Journal for Nature Conservation, 22, 377–383. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2014.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, D., Moorehead, L., Kruse, J., & Braund, S. (1999). Contrasts in use and perceptions of biological data for caribou management. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27, 488–498. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/3783918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofinas, G., Lyver, P., Russell, D., White, R., Nelson, A., & Flanders, N. (2003). Towards a protocol for community monitoring of caribou body condition. Rangifer, 23, 43–52. doi:10.7557/2.23.5.1678
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, J., Klein, D., Braund, S., Moorehead, L., & Simeone, B. (1998). Co-management of natural resources: A comparison of two caribou management systems. Human Organization, 57, 447–458. doi:10.17730/humo.57.4.q5825utw35841p11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauber, T., Decker, D., & Pomeranz, E. (2014). Public trust philosophy for fish and wildlife management: Implications for human dimensions. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 393–396. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.942761
   Google Scholar
• Lenart, E. (2015). Units 26B and 26C caribou. Chapter 18, pages 18–1 through 18–38. In P. Harper & L. McCarthy (Eds.), Caribou management report of survey and inventory activities 1 July 2012–30 June 2014 ( Species Management Report ADF&G/DWC/SMR-2015-4). Juneau, AK: Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, J., & Cheng, A. (2006). Public involvement in state fish and wildlife agencies in the U.S.: A thumbnail sketch of techniques and barriers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11, 55–69. doi:10.1080/10871200500471017
   Google Scholar
• Lute, M., & Gore, M. (2014). Knowledge and power in wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management, 78, 1060–1068. doi:10.1002/jwmg.754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, L., & Taras, M. (2011). Interior Alaska moose news. Retrieved from www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/species/speciesinfo/moose/pdfs/interior_moose_news_fall_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, H., & Taras, M. (2016). Central Arctic Caribou Herd news. Retrieved from www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/home/library/pdfs/wildlife/central_arctic_herd/central_arctic_caribou_herd_news_winter_2016_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minnis, D., Holsman, R., Grice, L., & Payton, R. (1997). Focus groups as a human dimensions research tool: Three illustrations of their use. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2, 40–49. doi:10.1080/10871209709359107
   Google Scholar
• Nedwick, M. (2012). Understanding the Board of Game. Retrived from https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/regulations/regprocess/gameboard/pdfs/bog_process.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 20–32. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ, J., Decker, D., Stevens, S., Lama, T., & Doyle-Capitman, C. (2014). Public trust principles and trust administration functions in the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation: Contributions of human dimensions research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 407–416. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.936068
   Google Scholar
• Parrett, L., Dau, J., & Nedwick, M. (2014). Four North Slope caribou herds counted. Retrieved from www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=wildlifenews.view_article&articles_id=678
   Google Scholar
• Riley, S., Siemer, W., Decker, D., Carpenter, L., Organ, J., & Berchielli, L. (2003). Adaptive impact management: An integrative approach to wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8, 81–95. doi:10.1080/10871200304301
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, B., & Riley, S. (2014). Factors affecting hunters’ trust and cooperation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 469–479. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.939314
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, N., Miller, H., & Dietsch, A. (2011). Appropriate uses and considerations for online surveying in human dimensions research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 154–163. doi:10.1080/10871209.2011.572142
   Google Scholar
• Talley, J., Schneider, J., & Lindquist, E. (2016). A simplified approach to stakeholder engagement in natural resource management: The Five-Feature Framework. Ecology and Society, 21. doi:10.5751/ES-08830-210438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaselli, M., Kutz, S., Gerlach, C., & Checkley, S. (2018). Local knowledge to enhance wildlife population health surveillance: Conserving muskoxen and caribou in the Canadian Arctic. Biological Conservation, 217, 337–348. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triezenberg, H., Riley, S., & Gore, M. (2016). A test of communication in changing harvest behaviors of deer hunters. Journal of Wildlife Management, 80, 941–946. doi:10.1002/jwmg.21078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanek, R., Nielsen, C., Davenport, M., & Woodson, B. (2015). Perceived and desired outcomes of suburban deer management methods. Journal of Wildlife Management, 79, 647–661. doi:10.1002/jwmg.871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar