Minimal effect sizes do not imply minimal effects for differences in long-tailed distributions

References

• Coe, R. (2002, September 12–14). It’s the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British educational research association. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter. Retrieved from www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, S. G., Korshunov, D., & Zachary, S. (2013). An introduction to heavy-tailed and subexponential distributions (Chapter 2). In Springer Series in Operations research and financial engineering, science and business media, chapter 2, p. 7. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gliner, J. A., Vaske, J. J., & Morgan, G. A. (2001). Null hypothesis significance testing: Effect size matters. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 6, 291–301. doi:10.1080/108712001753473966
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• HoggStuart, R., & Klugman, A. (1983). On the estimation of long-tailed skewed distributions with actuarial applications. Journal of Econometrics, 23, 91–102. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(83)90077-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan, T. C., Beaman, J., Chang, L. H., & Hsu, S. Y. (2008). Robust and alternative estimators for “better” estimates for expenditures and other “long tail” distributions. Tourism Management, 29, 795–806. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., & Preacher, K. (2012). On effect size. Psychological Methods, 17, 137–152. doi:10.1037/a0028086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. Y. (2015). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Effect size. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 40, 328–331. doi:10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746–759. doi:10.1177/0013164496056005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M. W., Hovmand, P., Pfeiffer, D., Fairchild, M., Rath, S., Golla, B., & Casey, C. (2014). The “long tail” and public health: New thinking for addressing health disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 2271–2278. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A., & Anderson, W. L. (2002). Digit preference in reported harvest among Illinois waterfowl hunters. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 55–65. doi:10.1080/108712002753574783
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A., Stephenson, A. L., & Williams, B. D. (2015). Reported harvest and days afield among waterfowl hunters: Do pre-season contacts make a difference? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20, 182–184. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.971473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, L. M., & Geissler, P. H. (1984). Improving stability of annual state waterfowl harvest estimates in highly-skewed data. American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the section on survey research methods (pp. 467–471), Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer, L. M., & Geissler, P. H. (1991). Accommodating outliers in wildlife surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 19, 267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Beginning behavioral research (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M. (2014). Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists (5th ed.). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8, 597–599. doi:10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
   Google Scholar
• Soper, D. S. (2019). A-priori sample size calculator for student t-tests [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J. (2019). Survey research and analysis (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: Sagamore-Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Miller, C. A. (2020). Influence of advanced notice record cards on waterfowl hunting participation and harvest distributions. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 25(3), this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., Gliner, J. A., & Morgan, G. A. (2002). Communicating judgments about practical significance: Effect size, confidence intervals and odds ratios. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 287–300. doi:10.1080/10871200214752
   Google Scholar