Social identity and acceptability of wild pig (Sus scrofa) control actions: A case study of Texas hunters

References

• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and self categorization. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 179–193). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., Slootmaker, C., Harper, E., Holderieath, J., & Shwiff, S. A. (2016). Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states. Crop Protection, 89, 89–94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261219416301557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch-Mordo, S., Breck, S. W., Wilson, K. R., & Broderick, J. (2009). A tool box half full: How social science can help solve human–wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14(3), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200902839324
   Google Scholar
• Bevins, S. N., Pedersen, K., Lutman, M. W., Gidlewski, T., & Deliberto, T. J. (2014). Consequences associated with the recent range expansion of nonnative feral swine. BioScience, 64(4), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, V. R., Marlow, M. C., Maison, R. M., Gidlewski, T., Bowen, R., & Bosco-Lauth, A. (2019). Current status and future recommendations for feral swine disease surveillance in the United States. Journal of Animal Science, 97(6), 2279–2282. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruskotter, J. T., Vaske, J. J., & Schmidt, R. H. (2009). Social and cognitive correlates of Utah residents’ acceptance of the lethal control of wolves. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200802712571
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, K. M., Harper, E. E., & Shwiff, S. A. (2020). An examination of ethical attitudes towards wild pig (Sus scrofa) toxicants in the United States. International Journal of Pest Management, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2020.1791372
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, R., Witt, G. B., & Lacey, J. (2015). The social identity approach to understanding socio-political conflict in environmental and natural resources management. Global Environmental Change, 34, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corn, J. L., & Jordan, T. R. (2017). Development of the national feral swine map, 1982–2016. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 41(4), 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Praeger Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., & Connelly, N. A. (1989). Motivations for deer hunting: Implications for antlerless deer harvest as a management tool. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 17(4), 455–463. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3782713.pdfcasa_token=UyAwj353JswAAAAA:m1yitzv5nFSw_QYC8WFFiz2nz38RQWQM5JylDJOMfJkyLrI08vc_TCSzeFtqUhHkpu9elM8M14_qOGlE8zgVtTJtm6dL8Q0j_pyFhZSq74sG4P7bOt7D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., Organ, J. F., Forstchen, A. B., Jacobson, C. A., Siemer, W. F., Smith, C. A., Lederle, P. E., & Schiavone, M. V. (2017). Wildlife governance in the 21st century—Will sustainable use endure? Wildlife Society Bulletin, 41(4), 821–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• Goedbloed, D. J., Megens, H. J., Van Hooft, P., Herrero‐Medrano, J. M., Lutz, W., Alexandri, P., Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., Groenen, M., Van WIEREN, S. E., Ydenberg, R. C., & Prins, H. H. T. (2013). Genome‐wide single nucleotide polymorphism analysis reveals recent genetic introgression from domestic pigs into Northwest European wild boar populations. Molecular Ecology, 22(3), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05670.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, M. J., Harper, E. E., Carlisle, K. M., Ernst, K. H., & Shwiff, S. A. (2019). Assessing public support for restrictions on transport of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 237, 488–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, E. E., Miller, C. A., Vaske, J. J., Mengak, M. T., & Bruno, S. (2016). Stakeholder attitudes and beliefs toward wild pigs in Georgia and Illinois. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 40(2), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeren, A., Karns, G., Bruskotter, J., Toman, E., Wilson, R., & Szarek, H. (2017). Expert judgement and uncertainity regarding the protection of imperiled species. Conservation Biology, 31(3), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12838
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heneghan, M. D., & Morse, W. C. (2019). Acceptability of management actions and the potential for conflict following human-black bear encounters. Society & Natural Resources, 32(4), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1556756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, F. A., Parker, B. M., Pylant, C. L., Smyser, T. J., Piaggio, A. J., Lance, S. L., Milleson, M. P., Austin, J. D., & Wisely, S. M. (2018). Invasion ecology of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Florida, USA: The role of humans in the expansion and colonization of an invasive wild ungulate. Biological Invasions, 20(7), 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1667-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self‐categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
   Google Scholar
• Keiter, D. A., Mayer, J. J., & Beasley, J. C. (2016). What is in a “common” name? A call for consistent terminology for nonnative Sus scrofa. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 40(2), 384–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuling, O., Strauß, E., & Siebert, U. (2016). Regulating wild boar populations is “somebody else’s problem”!-human dimension in wild boar management. Science of the Total Environment, 554, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsey, J. C. (2020). Ecology and management of wild pigs. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. https://tpwd.texas.gov/publications/pwdpubs/media/pwd_bk_w7000_1943.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koichi, K., Cottrell, A., Sangha, K. K., & Gordon, I. J. (2013). What determines the acceptability of wildlife control methods? A case of feral pig management in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, Australia. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 18(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2013.727523
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. S., Corn, J. L., Mayer, J. J., Jordan, T. R., Farnsworth, M. L., Burdett, C. L., VerCauteren, K. C., Sweeney, S. J., & Miller, R. S. (2019). Historical, current, and potential population size estimates of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States. Biological Invasions, 21(7), 2373–2384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-01983-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Georgari, M., Baltzi, K., & Baltzi, I. (2017). Public acceptance of management methods under different human–wildlife conflict scenarios. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lischka, S. A., Teel, T. L., Johnson, H. E., Reed, S. E., Breck, S., Carlos, A. D., & Crooks, K. R. (2018). A conceptual model for the integration of social and ecological information to understand human-wildlife interactions. Biological Conservation, 225, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S., & De Poorter, M. (2000). 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: A selection from the global invasive species database (Vol. 12). Invasive Species Specialist Group Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Lute, M. L., & Gore, M. L. (2014). Stewardship as a path to cooperation? Exploring the role of identity in intergroup conflict among Michigan wolf stakeholders. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2014.888600
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L., Gavin, M., & Fulton, D. (2014). Considerations in representing human individuals in social-ecological models. In M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, A. Rechkemmer, & E. A. Duke (Eds.), Understanding society and natural resources: Forging new strands in integration across the social sciences. (pp. 137-158). Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. J., & Brisbin, I. L. (2008). Wild pigs in the United States: Their history, comparative morphology, and current status. University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, S., Anderson, A., Carlisle, K., & Shwiff, S. A. (2020). Economic estimates of invasive pig damage to crops in 12 US states. Crop Protection, 132(105105), 105105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105105
   Google Scholar
• McLean, H. E., Teel, T. L., Bright, A. D., Jaebker, L. M., Tomecek, J. M., Frank, M. G., … Carlisle, K. M. (2021). Understanding tolerance for an invasive species: An investigation of hunter acceptance capacity for wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Texas. Journal of Environmental Management, 285, 112143.Naughton-Treves, L., Grossberg, R., & Treves, A. (2003). Paying for tolerance: Rural citizens’ attitudes toward wolf depredation and compensation. Conservation Biology, 17(6), 1500–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112143
   Google Scholar
• Naughton‐Treves, L., Grossberg, R., & Treves, A. (2003). Paying for tolerance: rural citizens' attitudes toward wolf depredation and compensation. Conservation biology, 17(6), 1500–1511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Bryan, C. J., Patton, N. R., Hone, J., Lewis, J. S., Berdejo-Espinola, V., Risch, D. R., Holden, M. H., & McDonald-Madden, E. (2021). Unrecognized threat to global soil carbon by a widespread invasive species. Global Change Biology, 00, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15769
   Google Scholar
• Pimental, D. (2007). Environmental and economic costs of vertebrate species invasions into the United States. Managing Vertebrate Invasive Species. 38.
   Google Scholar
• Sponarski, C. C., Vaske, J. J., & Bath, A. J. (2015). Differences in management action acceptability for coyotes in a National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 39(2), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 77–98)). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cup Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (2010). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 56–65).  (Eds.) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey: Brooks Cole.
   Google Scholar
• The Nature Conservancy. (2020). Retrieved July 23, 2020, from https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/who-we-are/our-mission-vision-and-values/#:~:text=The%20mission%20of%20The%20Nature,needs%20and%20enrich%20our%20lives
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service [USDA-APHIS]. (2016, April 6). Retrieved November 8, 2019, from. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/wildlifedamage/operational-activities/feral-swine
   Google Scholar
• Urbanek, R. E., Nielsen, C. K., Davenport, M. A., & Woodson, B. D. (2012). Acceptability and conflict regarding suburban deer management methods. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 17(6), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2012.684196
   Google Scholar
• van Eeden, L. M., Newsome, T. M., Crowther, M. S., Dickman, C. R., & Bruskotter, J. (2019). Social identity shapes support for management of wildlife and pests. Biological Conservation, 231, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eeden, L. M., Slagle, K., Newsome, T. M., Crowther, M. S., Dickman, C. R., & Bruskotter, J. T. (2020). Exploring nationality and social identity to explain attitudes toward conservation actions in the United States and Australia. Conservation Biology, 34(5), 1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J. (2019). Survey research and analysis. Sagamore-Venture LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., Roemer, J. M., & Taylor, J. G. (2013). Situational and emotional influences on the acceptability of wolf management actions in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 37(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, A., Mooers, A. O., Miller, D. C., Nibbelink, N., Redding, D., Kuhn, T. S., Roberts, J. T., & Gittleman, J. L. (2013). Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(29), 12144–12148. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221370110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar