Experience preferences and place attachment of Minnesota wildlife management area hunters

References

• Anderson, D. H., & Fulton, D. C. (2008). Experience preferences as mediators of the wildlife related recreation participation: Place attachment relationship. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200701669971
   Google Scholar
• Backman, S. J., & Wright, B. A. (1993). An exploratory study of the relationship of attitude and the perception of constraints to hunting. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 11(2), 1–16. https://www/cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19931859375
   Google Scholar
• Brunke, K. D., & Hunt, K. M. (2007). Comparison of two approaches for the measurement of waterfowl hunter satisfaction. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(6), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200701670128
   Google Scholar
• Budruk, M., & Wilhelm-Stanis, S. A. (2013). Place attachment and recreation experience preference: A further exploration of the relationship. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 1-2(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., Brown, T., & Gutierrez, R. (1980). Further insights into the multiple-satisfactions approach for hunter management. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 8(4), 323–331. https:/www/jstor.org/stable/3781185
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., Forstchen, A. B., Organ, J. F., Smith, C. A., Riley, S. J., Jacobson, C. A., Batcheller, G. R., & Siemer, W. F. (2014). Impacts management: An approach to fulfilling public trust responsibilities of wildlife agencies. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 38(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L. (1985). Specifying what is produced by management of wildlife by public agencies. Leisure Sciences, 7(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408509512126
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L., Tinsley, H. E. A., & Manfredo, M. J. (1991). The paragraphs about leisure and recreation experience preference scales: Results from two inventories designed to assess the breadth of the perceived psychological benefits of leisure. In I. P. J. Brown, B. L. Driver, & G. L. Peterson (Eds.), Benefits of leisure (pp. 263–286). Venture Publsihers, State College.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L. (2008). Managing to optimize the beneficial outcomes of recreation. Venture Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Forstchen, A. B., & Smith, C. A. (2014). The essential role of human dimensions and stakeholder participation in state’s fulfillment of public trust responsibilities. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(5), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2014.940561
   Google Scholar
• Hayslette, S. E., Armstrong, J. B., & Mirarchi, R. E. (2001). Mourning dove hunting in Alabama: Motivations, satisfactions, and sociocultural influences. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 6(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/108712001317151930
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, C., Organ, J., Decker, D., Batcheller, G., & Carpenter, L. (2010). A conservation institution for the 21st century: Implications for state wildlife agencies. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74(2), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.2193/2008-485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, G. T., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. (2004). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004a). Effects of place attachment on user’s perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004b). Predictors of behavioral loyalty among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Leisure Sciences, 26(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400490272675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004c). Effect of activity involvement and place attachment on recreationists’ perceptions of setting density. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Decker, D. J., Siemer, W. F., & Baumer, M. S. (2014). Exploring the social habitat for hunting: Toward a comprehensive framework for understanding hunter recruitment and retention. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2014.850126
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M., & Larson, R. (1993). Managing for wildlife viewing recreation experiences: An application in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21(3), 226–236. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3782860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M., Driver, B., & Tarrant, M. (1996). Measuring leisure motivation: A meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(3), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1996.11949770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M., & Driver, B. (2002). Benefits: The basis for action. In M. J. Manfreod (Ed.), Wildlife viewing, a management handbook (pp. 43–69). Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M., Pierce, C., Vaske, J., & Whittaker, D. (2002). An experience-based approach to planning and management for wildlife-viewing recreation. In M. J. Manfreod (Ed.), Wildlife viewing, a management handbook (pp. 70–92). Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmood, S., Zhang, D., & Armstrong, J. (2003). Factors associated with declining hunting license sales in Alabama. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8(4), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/716100423
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., & Vaske, J. (2003). Individual and situational influences on declining hunter effort in Illinois. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8(4), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/716100421
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409409513214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R., & Driver, B. (2005). Introduction to outdoor recreation: Providing and managing natural resource-based opportunities. Venture Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Organ, J. F., Daniel, D., Stevens, S., Lama, T., & Doyle-Capitman, C. (2014). Public trust principles and trust administration functions in the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation: Contributions of human dimensions research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(5), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2014.936068
   Google Scholar
• Payton, M. A., Fulton, D. C., & Anderson, D. H. (2005). Influence of place attachment and trust on civic action: A study at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge. Society and Natural Resources, 18(6), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590947940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon, H., & Mavondo, F. T. (2017). Proenvironmental behavior: Critical link between satisfaction and place attachment in Australia and Canada. Tourism Analysis, 22(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354217X14828625279735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Responsive Management/National Shooting Sports Foundation. (2010). Issues related to hunting access in the United States: Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Schorr, R. A., Lukacs, P. M., & Gude, J. A. (2014). The Montana deer and elk hunting population: The importance of cohort groups, license price, and population demographics on hunter retention, recruitment, and population change. Journal of Wildlife Management, 78(5), 944–952. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S. A., Fulton, D. C., & Lawrence, J. S. (2006). Managing for preferred hunting experiences: A typology of Minnesota waterfowl hunters. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34(2), 380–387. h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[380:MFPHEA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Interior. (2016). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960109598658
   Google Scholar
• Vrtiska, M. P., Gammonley, J. H., Naylor, L. W., & Raedeke, A. H. (2013). Economic and conservation ramifications from the decline of waterfowl hunters. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 37(2), 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 134(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409209513155
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49(6), 830–840. h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1093/forestscience/49.6.830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. A., & Goodale, T. L. (1991). Beyond non-participation: Validation of interest and frequency of participation categories in constraints research. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(4), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1991.11969863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar