Beliefs of Forest Owners Toward Cooperative Capercaillie Lekking Site Management Operations: a Pilot Study

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
   Google Scholar
• Bertsch, V., Hall, M., Weinhardt, C., & Fichtner, W. (2016). Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany. Energy, 2016(114), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.022
   Google Scholar
• BirdLife International. (2016, October 1). Tetrao urogallus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016. Retrieved October 12, 2021, from https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22679487A85942729.en
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. B. (2002). Motivations to participate in riparian improvement programs: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Science Communication, 23(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554700202300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandy, N., Ballantyne, S., Moseley, D., Gill, R., Quine, C., & Van Der Wal, R. (2012). Exploring beliefs behind support for and opposition to wildlife management methods: A qualitative study. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 58(4), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. (2022, May 15). Advice and materials. https://tenk.fi/en/advice-and-materials
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. P., & Charnley, S. (2012). Risk and cooperation: managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes. Environmental Management, 49(6), 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9848-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(2), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209609359060
   Google Scholar
• Gass, R. J., Rickenbach, M., Schulte, L. A., & Zeuli, K. (2009). Cross-boundary coordination on forested landscapes: Investigating alternatives for implementation. Environmental Management, 43(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9195-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hai, M. (2021). Social acceptance of solar energy as intention, willingness, and readiness. [ Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. HELDA Digital Repository of the University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/332880
   Google Scholar
• Hallikainen, V., Hyppönen, M., Pernu, L., & Puoskari, J. (2010). Family forest owners’ opinions about forest management in Northern Finland. Silva Fennica, 44(2), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helle, P., & Helle, T. (1991). Miten metsärakenteen muutokset selittävät metsäkanalintujen pitkän aikavälin kannanmuutoksia? [How Do Changes in Forest Structure Explain Recent Changes in Finnish Grouse Populations?] Suomen Riista, 1991(37), 56–66.
   Google Scholar
• Helle, P., & Lindén, H. (2015). Katsaus metsäkantalintukantojen vaihteluihin Suomessa viimeisten 50 vuoden aikana. [Changes in Finnish Grouse Populations during the past half-century] Suomen Riista, 2015(61), 56–66 https://www.riistasaatio.fi/wp-content/uploads/sr61-56-66-a2b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero, A., Matala, J., & Pellikka, J. (2020). Miten riistaa neuvotaan huomioimaan metsänhoidossa? [How are forestry practitioners advised to take game animals into account?]. Suomen Riista. 2020(66), 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hujala, T., Kurttila, M., Korhonen, K., Hänninen, H., & Pykäläinen, J. (2010). Metsänomistajien päätöksentekotilanteet: Kohti uudistuvia metsäsuunnittelupalveluja ja suojelupäätösten tukea. [Forest owners’ decision-making situations: Towards renewable forest planning services and support for conservation decisions]. Metlan työraportteja No. 177, Metsäntutkimuslaitos. http://urn.fi/URN:978-951-40-2264-7
   Google Scholar
• Hujala, T., & Tikkanen, J. (2008). Boosters of and barriers to smooth communication in family forest owners’ decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23(5), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802334209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikonen, P., Rantala, M., Miettinen, J., Kuittinen, S., Hujala, T., Mehtätalo, L., & Pappinen, A. (2020). Grounds for improving the implementation of game-oriented forest management – A double sampling survey of Finnish forest owners and professionals. Forest Policy and Economics, 2020(119), 102266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102266
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2003). The logic of reciprocity: Trust, collective action, and law. Michigan Law Review, 102(1), 71–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppinen, H. (2005). Forest owners’ choice of reforestation method: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(3), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2003.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppinen, H. (2012). New forest owners and owners-to-be: Apples and oranges? Small-scale Forestry, 11(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9165-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppinen, H., & Berghäll, S. (2015). Forest owners’ stand improvement decisions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Forest Policy and Economics, 2015(50), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen, H., Hänninen, H., & Horne, P. (2020). Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2020. [Finnish forest owner 2020]. Luonnonvara- ja biotalouden tutkimus No. 30/2020, Luonnonvarakeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Kittredge, D. B. (2005). The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: International examples and potential application in the United States. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurki, S., Nikula, A., Helle, P., & Linden, H. (2000). Landscape fragmentation and forest composition effects on grouse breeding success in boreal forests. Ecology, 81(7), 1985–1997 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1985:LFAFCE]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, M., & Matilainen, A. (2014). Born to be a forest owner? An empirical study of the aspects of psychological ownership in the context of inherited forests in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29(2), 101–110 doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.869348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, E. Y., & Hsieh, J.-S. (2010). From intention to use: A longitudinal investigation on customer readiness and facilitating conditions for self-service technology. Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB), 2010(4), 111–120.
   Google Scholar
• Lindén, M., Lilja-Rothsten, S., Saaristo, L., & Keto-Tokoi, P. Eds. (2019). Metsänhoidon suositukset riistametsänhoitoon, työopas: Tapion julkaisuja. [Recommendations for game–oriented forest management, a handbook: publications of Tapio], Tapio Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Melin, M., Miettinen, J., Hotanen, J.-P., & Helle, P. (2020). Kotiläksyjä kanalinnuista ja metsän rakenteesta – Mikään metsä ei yksinään ole riittävä. [Homework on grouse and forest structure – No forest alone is sufficient. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja, 2020(10443), 11. https://doi.org/10.14214/ma.10443
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, J., Helle, P., & Nikula, A. (2005). Lek area characteristics of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in eastern Finland as analysed from satellite-based forest inventory data. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 20(4), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580500201619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, J., Helle, P., Nikula, A., & Niemelä, P. (2010). Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) habitat characteristics in north-boreal Finland. Silva Fennica, 44(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, J., Rantala, M., & Svensberg, M. (2019). Riistametsänhoidon opas. [Guide for game-oriented forest management]. Suomen riistakeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, E. T., Britton, J. R., & Curtin, S. (2019). Angler behaviors and motivations for exploiting invasive and native predatory fishes by catch-and-release: A case study on the river Severn catchment, Western England. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 24(5), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2019.1628324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakkala, T., Pellikka, J., & Lindén, H. (2003). Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus - a good candidate for an umbrella species in taiga forests. Wildlife Biology, 9(4), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2003.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (Third) ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Peltola, A., Räty, M., Sauvula-Seppälä, T., Torvelainen, J., Uotila, E., Vaahtera, E., & Ylitalo, E. (2020). Suomen metsätilastot 2020. [Finnish forest statistics 2020]. Luonnonvarakeskus, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302(5652), 1912–1914. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautiainen, M., Miettinen, J., Putaala, A., Rantala, M., & Alhainen, A. (2017). Grouse-friendly forest management in Finland. Unasylva, 249(68), 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Rickenbach, M. G., Guries, R. P., & Schmoldt, D. L. (2006). Membership matters: Comparing members and non-members of NIPF owner organizations in southwest Wisconsin, USA. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickenbach, M. G., & Reed, A. S. (2002). Cross-boundary cooperation in a watershed context: The sentiments of private forest landowners. Environmental Management, 30(4), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2688-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolstad, J., Rolstad, E., & Wegge, P. (2007). Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus lek formation in young forest. Wildlife Biology, 13(1), 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, L. A., Rickenbach, M., & Merrick, L. C. (2008). Ecological and economic benefits of cross-boundary coordination among private forest landowners. Landscape Ecology, 23(4), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9207-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirkiä, S., Helle, P., Lindén, H., Nikula, A., Norrdahl, K., Suorsa, P., & Valkeajärvi, P. (2011). Persistence of Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) lekking areas depends on forest cover and fine-grain fragmentation of boreal forest landscapes. Ornis Fennica, 88(1), 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sok, J., Borges, J. R., Schmidt, P., & Ajzen, I. (2021). Farmer behaviour as reasoned action: A critical review of research with the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(2), 388–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, W., Graf, R. F., & Hess, R. (2002). Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and avian biodiversity: Testing the umbrella-species concept. Conservation Biology, 16(3), 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaab, R., Postmes, T., van Beest, I., & Spears, R. (2007). Shared cognition as a product of, and precursor to, shared identity in negotiations. Personality & Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegge, P., Eliassen, S., Finne, M. H., & Odden, M. (2005). Social interactions among Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus males outside the lek during spring. Ornis Fennica, 82(4), 147–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegge, P., & Larsen, B. B. (1987). Spacing of adult and subadult male common capercaillie during the breeding season. The Auk, 104(3), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/4087547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegge, P., & Rolstad, J. (2011). Clearcutting forestry and Eurasian boreal forest grouse: Long-term monitoring of sympatric capercaillie Tetrao urogallus and black grouse T. tetrix reveals unexpected effects on their population performances. Forest Ecology and Management, 261(9), 1520–1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar