http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-0209
References
- National Residency Matching Program. Data release and research committee: results of the 2014 NRMP Program Director Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Resident Matching Program; 2014.
- Dean’s Letter Advisory Committee, ed. A guide to the preparation of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2002
- Group on Student Affairs, ed. Association of American Medical Colleges. Recommendations for revising the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE). Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2016. cited 2017 Jan 10. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/download/470400/data/mspe-recommendations.pdf
- Mallott D. Interview, dean’s letter, and affective domain issues. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;449:56–10.
- Loftus LS, Arnold L, Willoughby TL, et al. First-year residents’ performances compared with their medical school class ranks as determined by three ranking systems. Acad Med. 1992;67(5):319–323.
- Green M, Jones P, Thomas JX. Selection criteria for residency: results of a national program directors survey. Acad Med. 2009;84(3):362–367.
- Weissman S. Why reforms must be made to make the dean’s letter useful. Acad Med. 2013;88(4):434.
- Alexander EK, Osman NY, Walling JL, et al. Variation and imprecision of clerkship grading in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2012;87(8):1070–1076.
- Lurie SJ, Lambert DR, Grady-Weliky TA. Relationship between dean’s letter rankings and later evaluations by residency program directors. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19(3):251–256.
- Shea JA, O’Grady E, Morrison G, et al. Medical Student Performance Evaluations in 2005: an improvement over the former dean’s letter? Acad Med. 2008;83(3):284–291.
- Harfmann KL, Zirwas MJ. Can performance in medical school predict performance in residency? A compilation and review of correlative studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(5):1010–1022.e2.