References
- Yarris LM, Gottlieb M, Scott K, et al. Academic primer series: Key papers about peer review. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(4):721–6.
- Bohannon J. Who’s afraid of peer review? Science. 2013;342(6154):60–65.
- Lee CJ, Sugimoto CR, Zhang G, et al. Bias in peer review. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;64(1):2–17.
- Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Boswell MV, et al. Medical journal peer review: process and bias. Pain Physician. 2015;18(1):E1–E14.
- Eva KW. The reviewer is always right: peer review of research in medical education. Med Educ. 2009;43(1):2–4.
- Lee K, Whelan JS, Tannery NH, et al. 50 years of publication in the field of medical education. Med Teach. 2013 Jul 1;35(7):591–598.
- Lovejoy TI, Revenson TA, France CR. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(1):1–13.
- Azer SA, Ramani S, Peterson R. Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals. Med Teach. 2012;34(9):698–704.
- Roediger H. Twelve tips for reviewers. Published online 2007. Accessed 2021 Jun 9. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/951da191f36ad139db7d055c6f7a2ba9b8275c16
- Bordage G. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med. 2001;76(9):889–896.
- Pierson DJ. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Respir Care. 2004;49(10):1246–1252.
- Meyer HS, Durning SJ, Sklar DP, et al. Making the first cut: an analysis of academic medicine editors’ reasons for not sending manuscripts out for external peer review. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):464–470.
- Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: SAGE Publications; 2014.
- Messick S. Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 1995;14(4):5–8.
- Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37(9):830–837.
- Willis GB, Ar A Jr. What do our respondents think we’re asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(3):353–356.
- Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, et al. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1609406917733847.
- Norman G. Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19(1):1–5.
- Lingard L. The writer’s craft. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(2):79–80.
- Sullivan GM. Writing education studies for publication. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(2):133–137.
- Sullivan GM. What to do when your paper is rejected. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(1):1–3.
- Lingard L. Story, not study: 30 brief lessons to inspire health researchers as writers. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature. 2021.
- JGME. Instructions for Journal of Graduate Medical Education (JGME) peer reviewers. Instructions for Authors. Published April 2018. Cited 2021 Jun 14. https://meridian.allenpress.com/DocumentLibrary/GMED/JGME-Peer-Reviewer-Instructions_April%202018.pdf
- Durning S And Carline. Review criteria for research manuscripts. AAMC Store. Published August 2015. Cited 2021 Jun 14. https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/189/
- Snell L, Spencer J. Reviewers’ perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):90–97.
- Durning SJ, Sklar DP, Driessen EW, et al. “This manuscript was a complete waste of time”: Reviewer etiquette matters. Acad Med. 2019;94(6):744–745.
- LaDonna KA, Taylor T, Lingard L. Why open-ended survey questions are unlikely to support rigorous qualitative insights. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):347–349.