Development and psychometric testing of a scale measuring caring behaviors for healthcare students and providers

References

• Fan VY, Lin SC. It is time to include compassion in medical training. Acad Med. 2013;88:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair S, Norris JM, McConnell SJ, et al. Compassion: a scoping review of the healthcare literature. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer T, Klimecki OM. Empathy and compassion. Curr Biol. 2014;24:R875–R878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lown BA, Rosen J, Marttila J. An agenda for improving compassionate care: a survey shows about half of patients say such care is missing. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2011;30:1772–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trzeciak S, Roberts BW, Mazzarelli AJ. Compassionomics: hypothesis and experimental approach. Med Hypotheses. 2017;107:92–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santo-Novak DA. Older adults’ descriptions of their role expectations of nursing. J Gerontol Nurs. 1997;23:32–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hogg R, Hanley J, Smith P. Learning lessons from the analysis of patient complaints relating to staff attitudes, behaviour and communication, using the concept of emotional labour. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27:e1004–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson J. Caring theory as an ethical guide to administrative and clinical practices. Nurs Adm Q. 2006;30:48–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient-centered care is associated with decreased health care utilization. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24:229–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonges M, Ray J. Translating caring theory into practice: the Carolina care model. J Nurs Adm. 2011;4:374–381.
   Google Scholar
• Larson PJ. Cancer nurses’ perceptions of caring. Cancer Nurs. 1986;9:86–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larson PJ, Ferketich SL. Patients’ satisfaction with nurses caring during hospitalization. West J Nurs Res. 1993;15:690Y707.
   Google Scholar
• Watson J. Nursing: the philosophy and science of caring. Boulder/Colorado: University Press of Colorado; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Latham C. Predictors of patient outcomes following interactions with nurses. West J Nurs Res. 1996;18:548–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf ZR, Miller PA, Devine M. Relationship between nurse caring and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures. MedSurg Nursing J. 2003;12:391–396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, et al. Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69:63–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West CP, Huschka MM, Novotny PJ, et al. Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA. 2006;296:1071–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissmann PF, Branch WT, Gracey CF, et al. Role modeling humanistic behavior: learning bedside manner from the experts. Acad Med. 2006;82:661–667.
   Google Scholar
• Burnell L, Agan DL. Compassionate care: can it be defined and measured? the development of the compassionate care assessment tool. Int J Caring Sci. 2013;6:180–187.
   Google Scholar
• Lown BA, Muncer SJ, Chadwick R. Can compassionate healthcare be measured? the Schwartz center compassionate care scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1005–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, et al. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004;21:699–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts BW, Roberts MB, Yao J, et al. Development and validation of a tool to measure patient assessment of clinical compassion. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2:e193976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-Hsieh J, Kuo CL, Tsai YH. An action research on the development of a caring curriculum in Taiwan. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43:391–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavec A, Drnovšek M. Perspective on scale development in entrepreneurship research. Econ Bus Rev. 2012;14:39–62.
   Google Scholar
• TSA. Research ethics framework of society institute in Taiwan. Available online: http://proj3.sinica.edu.tw/~tsa/modules/tadnews/index.php?nsn=43 (accessed on 2016 Nov 26).
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. Armonk/NY: IBM Corp; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39:31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett MS. A further note on tests of significance in factor analysis. Br J Psychol. 1951;4:1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle JL. IBM SPSS Amos 24 User’s Guide. New York/NY: IBM; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Business Res Methods. 2008;6:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107:238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair J, Black W, Babin B, et al. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River/NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau MC. Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun AIS. 2000;4:1–78.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York/NY: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. New York/NY/USD: Allyn and Bacon; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Mukherjee S, Kumar A, et al. A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. J Bus Res. 2005;58:935–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z. Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate customer satisfaction in the China internet bank sector. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems (ICIMCS 2011), Hong Kong, China, 2011 Dec 12–13; ASME International, 2011; pp. 975–978.
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8:23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK. Pesquisa de Marketing: uma Orientação Aplicada. 6th ed. São Paulo/Brazil: Bookman; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett MS. A note on the multiplying factors for various chi-square approximations. J R Stat Soc. 1954;16:296–298.
   Google Scholar
• Cinar D, Yava A. Validity and reliability of functional assessment of chronic illness treatment-fatigue scale in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición. 2018;65:409–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalçiner N, Türkmen SN, Irmak H, et al. The validity and reliability of the Turkish Form of Recovery Process Inventory. Anatolian J Psychiatry. 2019;20:32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Menezes MS, Gusmão MM, Santana RM, et al. Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the role-modeling cost-conscious behaviors scale. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18:39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 5th ed. New York/NY: Routledge; 2009.
   Google Scholar