Do they speak like me? Exploring how perceptions of linguistic difference may influence patient perceptions of healthcare providers

References

• Jarosz L, Lawson V. “Sophisticated people versus rednecks”: economic restructuring and class difference in America’s West. Antipode. 2002;34:8–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley LC. THE CONSEQUENCES OF CONFLICTING STEREOTYPES: BOSTONIAN PERCEPTIONS OF U.S. DIALECTS. Am Speech. 2005;80(4):388–405.
   Google Scholar
• Hall-Lew L, Stephens N. Country Talk. Journal of English Linguistics. 2012;40(3):256–280.
   Google Scholar
• Winkfield KM, Levit LA, Tibbits M, et al. Addressing equity, diversity, and inclusion of black physicians in the oncology workforce. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17(5):224–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. QuickFacts Table. Published 2021. 2022 Jan 25. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges. Figure 18. Percentage of All Active Physicians by Race/Ethnicity, 2018.; 2019. 2022 Jan 25. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/figure-18-percentage-all-active-physicians-race/ethnicity-2018
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Clinical Oncology. Facts & figures: diversity in oncology. Published January 29, 2016. 2022 Jan 27. https://www.asco.org/news-initiatives/current-initiatives/diversity-oncology-initiative/facts-figures
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges. Figure 15. Percentage of Full-Time U.S. Medical School Faculty by Race/Ethnicity; 2018. 2022 Jan 25. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/figure-15-percentage-full-time-us-medical-school-faculty-race/ethnicity-2018
   Google Scholar
• Brotherton SE, Etzel SI. Graduate medical education, 2019-2020. JAMA. 2020;324(12):1230–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janopaul-Naylor JR, Roberts SE, Shu H-K, et al. Race, ethnicity, and sex among senior faculty in radiation oncology from 2000 to 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(1):e2142720.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giles H, Coupland N, and Coupland J. Accommodation theory: communication, context, and consequence. In: Giles H, Coupland J, Coupland N, editors. Contexts of accommodation: developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 1991. p. 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Greenaway K, Peters K, and Haslam A, et al. Shared identity and the intergroup dynamics. In: Giles H, Maas A, editors. Advances in intergroup communication. New York: Peter Lang; 2016. p. 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kalkhoff W, Barnum C. The effects of status-organizing and social identity processes on patterns of social influence. Soc Psychol Q. 2000;63(2):95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green LJ. African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 2002. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511800306.
   Google Scholar
• Mufwene SS. The Emergence of African American English: Monogenetic or Polygenetic? With or Without “Decreolization”? Under How Much Substrate Influence? Bloomquist, J, Green, LJ, Lanehart, SL. The Oxford Handbook of African American Language (Online edn: Oxford Academic 2015 57–84 28 July 2022). DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199795390.013.6
   Google Scholar
• Van Riper WR. General American: an ambiguity. In: Allen HB, Linn MD, editors. Dialect and language variation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science & Technology Books; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wells JC. Accents of English. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht ML, Jackson RL, and Ribeau SA. African American Communication: exploring Identity and Culture. Oxfordshire, U.K.: Routledge; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum GK. African American vernacular english is not standard english with mistakes. In: Wheeler RS, editor. The workings of language: from prescriptions to perspectives. Vol. 1999 (Westport, CT: Praeger) 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Cocchiara FK, Bell MP, Casper WJ. Sounding “different”: the role of sociolinguistic cues in evaluating job candidates. Hum Resour Manage. 2016;55(3):463–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itano JK. Cultural diversity among individuals with cancer. In: Yarbro CH, Wujcik D, Gobel BH, editors. Cancer nursing: principles and practice. 7th ed. Burlington, MA: Jones Bartlett Learning; 2011: 658–676.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschenman J, and Neckerman KM. We’d love to hire them, but … ”: the meaning of race for employers. In: Jenks C, Peterson PE, editors. The urban underclass. Vol 203. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press; 1991. p. 203–232.
   Google Scholar
• Alim HS, Reyes A, and Kroskrity PV. The Field of Language and Race: A Linguistic Anthropological Approach to Race, Racism, and Racialization Alim, H, Reyes, A, Kroskrity, PV eds. \The Oxford Handbook of Language and Race (Online edn: Oxford Academic) 2020. Published online 2020:1–21. DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190845995.013.1.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin M, Chakraborty A, Lee S, et al. A realistic talking human embodied agent mobile phone intervention to promote HIV medication adherence and retention in care in young HIV-positive African American men who have sex with men: qualitative study. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2018;6(7):e10211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vilaro MJ, Wilson‐Howard DS, Griffin LN, et al. Tailoring virtual human-delivered interventions: a digital intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening for black women. Psychooncology. 2020;29(12):2048–2056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Bickmore T, and Paasche-Orlow M, et al. Agent-user concordance and satisfaction with a virtual hospital discharge nurse. In: Bickmore T, Marsella S, Sidner C, editors. Intelligent virtual agents. vol 8637. lecture notes in computer science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 528–541. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-09767-1_63.
   Google Scholar
• Wood NI. Departing from doctor-speak: a perspective on code-switching in the medical setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(3):464–466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hornsey MJ, Imani A. Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: an identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004;30(3):365–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam N, Holland E, and Stratemeyer M. Intergroup metaphors. Giles, H, Maass, A eds. In: Advances in Intergroup Communication. New York: Peter Lang; 2016. p. 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Takeshita J, Wang S, Loren AW, et al. Association of racial/ethnic and gender concordance between patients and physicians with patient experience ratings. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(11):e2024583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard AK. Code Switch. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(23):e87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flores N, Rosa J. Undoing appropriateness: raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harv Educ Rev. 2015;85(2):149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa J, Flores N. Unsettling race and language: toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Lang Soc. 2017;46(5):621–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger JL, Neil JM, Duke KA, et al. A pilot study examining the efficacy of delivering colorectal cancer screening messages via virtual health assistants. Am J Prev Med. Published online 2021 Apr 19;61(2):251–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin L, Lee D, Jaisle A, et al. Creating an mHealth app for colorectal cancer screening: user-centered design approach. JMIR Hum Factors. 2019;6(2):e12700.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zalake M, Tavassoli F, Duke K, et al. Internet-based tailored virtual human health intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: design guidelines from two user studies. J Multimodal User Interface. Published online 2021 Jan 2;15(2):147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng A. 2021. 5th Annual Postdoctoral Research Symposium, University of California, Irvine 2021, March 24 Online.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey JC, Richmond VP, Daly JA. The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Hum Commun Res. 1975;1(4):323–332.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson FL, Buttny R. White listeners’ responses to “sounding black” and “sounding white”: the effects of message content on judgments about language. Commun Monogr. 1982;49(1):33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, and Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S eds. The social psychology of intergroup relations (Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole); 1979: 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson RL, Johnson AL, and Hecht ML, et al. African American communication: examining the complexities of lived experiences. Oxfordshire, U.K.: Routledge; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sotto-Santiago S, Slaven JE, Rohr-Kirchgraber T. (Dis)Incentivizing patient satisfaction metrics: the unintended consequences of institutional bias. Health Equity. 2019;3(1):13–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roessel J, Schoel C, Stahlberg D. Modern notions of accent-ism: findings, conceptualizations, and implications for interventions and research on nonnative accents. J Lang Soc Psychol. 2020;39(1):87–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin RC. doctors are more likely to describe black patients as uncooperative, studies find The New York Times. New York Times. 2022 Feb 16:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelstein G, Bates D, Zhou L. Examination of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(1):e2144967.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baugh J. Linguistics in Pursuit of Justice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Capers QI, Clinchot D, McDougle L, et al. Implicit racial bias in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2017;92(3):365–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linzer M, Harwood E. Gendered expectations: do they contribute to high burnout among female physicians? J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(6):963–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlich RN, Drumheller K, Clark R, and Baskin, MB, et al. MECHANICAL TURK: IS IT JUST ANOTHER CONVENIENCE SAMPLE? Global Journal of Business Disciplines 2018;2(1):45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Walters K, Christakis DA, Wright DR. Are mechanical truck worker samples representative of health status and health behaviors in the U.S.? PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0198835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic M, Giles H, Beck AC, et al. The fluency principle: why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Commun Monogr. 2017;84(3):385–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic M, Mastro D, Giles H, et al. Silencing nonstandard speakers: a content analysis of accent portrayals on American primetime television. Lang Soc. 2016;45(1):59–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar