‘Good’ and ‘bad’ doctors - a qualitative study of the Austrian public on the elements of professional medical identity

References

• Wagner P, Hendrich J, Moseley G, et al. Defining medical professionalism: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2007;41(3):288–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehiralti M, Akpinar A, Ersoy N. Attributes of a good physician: what are the opinions of first-year medical students? J Med Ethics. 2010;36(2):121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden M, Buck E, Clark M, et al. Professional identity formation in medical education: the convergence of multiple domains. HEC Forum. 2012;24(4):245–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharpless J, Baldwin N, Cook R, et al. The becoming: students’ reflections on the process of professional identity formation in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):713–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis-Selinger S, Pratt DD, Regehr G. Competency is not enough: integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse. Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1185–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monrouxe LV. Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care? Med Educ. 2010;44(1):40–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, et al. Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1446–1451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, et al. A Schematic Representation Of The Professional Identity Formation And Socialization Of Medical Students And Residents: a guide for medical educators. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):718–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleakley A, Bligh J. Students learning from patients: let’s get real in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2008;13(1):89–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM. How students learn from community-based preceptors. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7(2):149–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kline CC, Park SE, Godolphin WJ, et al. Professional identity formation: a role for patients as mentors. Acad Med. 2020;95(10):1578–1586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monrouxe LV, Rees CE, Hu W. Differences in medical students’ explicit discourses of professionalism: acting, representing, becoming. Med Educ. 2011;45(6):585–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towle A, Bainbridge L, Godolphin W, et al. Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):64–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalani M, Baines R, Bryce M, et al. Patient and public involvement in medical performance processes: a systematic review. Health Expectations. 2019;22(2):149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(15):15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin GP. Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management. Soc sci med. 2008;67(11):1757–1765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. BMJ Qual Saf. 2010;19(5):e22.
   Google Scholar
• Boivin A, Lehoux P, Burgers J, et al. What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation. Milbank Q. 2014;92(2):319–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanwick T, Forrest, K, O'Brien Bridget, C. Understanding medical education. In: Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2018. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett D, Solomon Y, Bergin C, et al. Possibility and agency in figured worlds: becoming a ‘good doctor’. Med Educ. 2017;51(3):248–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino JC. Physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jha V, Bekker HL, Duffy SRG, et al. Perceptions of professionalism in medicine: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2006;40(10):1027–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliescu ML, Carauleanu A. The portrait of a good doctor: conclusions from a patients and medical students survey. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala. 2014;47:261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fones CS, Kua EH, Goh LG. What makes a good doctor? Views of the medical profession and the public in setting priorities for medical education. Singapore Med J. 1998;39(12):537–542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jung HP, Wensing M, Grol R. What makes a good general practitioner: do patients and doctors have different views? Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47:805–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miratashi Yazdi SN, Nedjat S, Arbabi M, et al. Who is a good doctor? Patients & physicians’ perspectives. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(1):150–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambe P, Bristow D. What are the most important non-academic attributes of good doctors? A Delphi survey of clinicians. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):e347–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies R, Warren P, Messias E, et al. Why a medical career and what makes a good doctor? Beliefs of incoming USA medical students. Educ Health. 2009;22(3):13.
   Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Briand B, Auret K, Johnson P, et al. ‘A world of difference’: a qualitative study of medical students’ views on professionalism and the ‘good doctor’. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muddiman E, Bullock AD, Hampton JM, et al. Disciplinary boundaries and integrating care: using Q-methodology to understand trainee views on being a good doctor. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy M, Cullen W, Bury G. What makes a good doctor? A cross sectional survey of public opinion. Ir Med J. 2003;96(2):38–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfeiffer A, Noden B, Walker Z, et al. General population and medical student perceptions of good and bad doctors in Mozambique. Educ Health. 2011;24(1):387–399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crigger N, Godfrey N. From the inside out: a New approach to teaching professional identity formation and professional ethics. J Prof Nurs. 2014;30(5):376–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt: Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR): 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Luthy C, Cedraschi C, Perrin E, et al. How do patients define ‘good’ and ‘bad’ doctors? Swiss Med Wkly. 2005;135(5–6):82–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Old A, Adams B, Foley P, et al. Society’s expectation of the role of the doctor in New Zealand: results of a national survey. J N Z Medi Associ. 2011;124(1342):10–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson M, Tritter JQ. Disentangling patient and public involvement in healthcare decisions: why the difference matters. Sociol Health Illn. 2017;39(1):95–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, et al. Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50(460):882–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin SJ. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Anna Family Med. 2004;2(6):595–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmady S, Khani H, Mirmoghtadaie Z. The perceptions of patients and their families about a good physician: a qualitative content analysis. Stride Dev Med Educ. 2018;15(1):e62391.
   Google Scholar
• Aoun M, Sleilaty G, Abou Jaoude S, et al. How do Lebanese patients perceive the ideal doctor based on the CanMEDS competency framework? BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borracci RA, Gallesio JM Á, Ciambrone G, et al. What patients consider to be a ‘good’ doctor, and what doctors consider to be a ‘good’ patient. Rev Méd Chile. 2020;148(7):930–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattner A, Rudin D, Jellin N. Good physicians from the perspective of their patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(26):26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doherty EM, Nugent E. Personality factors and medical training: a review of the literature. Med Educ. 2011 Feb;45(2):132–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha JF, Anat DS, Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J. 2010;10(1):38–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cegala DJ, Lenzmeier Broz S. Physician communication skills training: a review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1004–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikesell L. Medicinal relationships: caring conversation. Med Educ. 2013;47(5):443–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Franco CAGS, Franco RS, Lopes JMC, et al. Clinical communication skills and professionalism education are required from the beginning of medical training - a point of view of family physicians. BMC Med Educ Internet]. 2018;18(1):43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldie J. The formation of professional identity in medical students: considerations for educators. Med Teach. 2012 Sep 1;34(9):e641–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn ML, Schooler C. Work and personality : an inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Norwood (NJ): Ablex; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Martin C, Robinson WD. Teaching thinking: a survey of programmes in education. Bristol: Bristol Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Berman AC, Chutka DS. Assessing effective physician-patient communication skills: “Are you listening to me, doc?” Korean J Med Educ. 2016;28(2):243–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bachmann C, Abramovitch H, Barbu CG, et al. A European consensus on learning objectives for a core communication curriculum in health care professions. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(1):18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar