Mediating effect of reflection types: feedback on reflection-for-action and student perception of patient-centredness

References

• Hearn J, Dewji M, Stocker C, et al. Patient-centered medical education: a proposed definition. Med Teach. 2019;41(8):934–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Academy of Medical Educators. Professional standards [cited 2022 Mar 27]. Available from:: http://www.medicaleducators.org/Professional-Standards
   Google Scholar
• Schein EH. Career dynamics: matching individual and organizational needs. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lala R, Jeuring J, Van Dortmont J, et al. Scenarios in virtual learning environments for one-to-one communication skills training. Int J Educ Technol Higher Educ. 2017;14(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ. 2001;323(7318):908–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe DJ, Baker AC, Marino JA A., Delamater, D., Marrero eds. Behavioral Diabetes (Springer). 2020;463–478. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33286-0_29.
   Google Scholar
• Van Winkle LJ, Chandar N, Green JM, et al. Does critical reflection by biochemistry learning teams foster patient-centered beliefs among medical students? Med Sci Educ. 2011;21(2):158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Bringle RG, Hatcher JA. Reflection in service learning: making meaning of experience. Educ Horiz. 1999;summer:179–185.
   Google Scholar
• Boud D, Keogh R, Walker D. What is reflection in learning? In: Boud D, Keogh R, Walker D, editors. Reflection: turning experience into learning. NY: RoutledgeFalmer; 1985. p. 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schon D. The Reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. NY: Basic Books; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Perini M, Cattaneo AA, Tacconi G. Using hypervideo to support undergraduate students’ reflection on work practices: a qualitative study. Int J Educ Technol Higher Educ. 2019;16(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler DR. Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract. 1998;5(1):77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Prue DM, Fairbank JA. Performance feedback in organizational behavior management: a review. J Organ Behav Manag. 1981;3(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Black P, Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract. 1998;5(1):7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77(1):81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss S, Huth K. How to design informative tutoring for multimedia learning. In: Niegemann HM, Leutner D, Brunken R, editors. Instructional design for multimedia learning. NY: Waxmann; 2004. p. 181–195.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer RE. Should there be a three-strike rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. Am Psychol. 2004;59(1):14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno R, Mayer RE. Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. J Educ Psychol. 2005;97(1):117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anseel F, Lievens F, Schollaert E. Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes. 2009;110(1):23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis S, Davidi I. After-event reviews: drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(5):857–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember D, Leung DYP, Jones A, et al. Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2000;25(4):381–395.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve BB, David MT, Bann CM, et al. Psychometric evaluation and design of patient-centred communication measures for cancer care settings. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(7):1322–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson A. Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Act Learn Higher Educ. 2013;14(1):63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball E, Franks H, Jenkins J, et al. Annotation is a valuable tool to enhance learning and assessment in student essays. Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29(3):284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown E, Glover C. Evaluating written feedback. In: Bryan C, Clegg K, editors. Innovative assessment in higher education. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Carless D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Stud Higher Educ. 2006;31(2):219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew S. Student perceptions of what helps them learn and develop in higher education. Teach Higher Educ. 2001;6(3):309–331.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson P. Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2011;36(1):51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins R, Hartley P, Skelton A. The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Stud Higher Educ. 2002;27(1):53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James D. Making the graduate: perspectives on student experience of assessment in higher education. In: Filer A, editor. Assessment: social practice and social product. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer; 2000. p. 151–167.
   Google Scholar
• Lipnevich AA, Smith JK. I really need feedback to learn: students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educ Assess Eval Acc. 2009;21(4):347–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts SE. Testing, testing: how do students use written feedback? Act Learn Higher Educ. 2005;6(3):218–229.
   Google Scholar
• Rae AM, Cochrane DK. Listening to students: how to make written assessment feedback useful. Act Learn Higher Educ. 2008;9(3):217–230.
   Google Scholar
• Rice M, Mousley J, Davis R. Improving student feedback in distance education: a research report. Res Distance Educ. 1994;3:52–62.
   Google Scholar
• Scott J, Badge J, Cann A. Perceptions of feedback one year on: a comparative study of the views of first and second year biological sciences students. Biosci Educ. 2009;13(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Séror J. Institutional forces and L2 writing feedback in higher education. Can Mod Lang Rev. 2009;66(2):203–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver MR. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors written responses. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2006;31(3):379–394.
   Google Scholar
• Whitington V, Glover A, Harley F. Preservice early childhood students’ perceptions of written feedback on their essays. Early Child Dev Care. 2004;174(4):321–337.
   Google Scholar
• Keller JM. First principles of motivation to learn and e3‐learning. Distance Educ. 2008;29(2):175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D. Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Dir Adult Contin Educ. 2001;2001(90):9–18.
   Google Scholar