Making LibGuides Work: Student Interviews and Usability Tests

References

• Arnold, J. M., Csir, F., Sias, J., & Zhang, J. (2004). Does anyone need help out there? Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 9(3–4), 115–134. doi:10.1300/J136v09n03_09
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. L. (2014). Designing LibGuides as instructional tools for critical thinking and effective online learning. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3–4), 107–117. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2014.944423
   Google Scholar
• Blakiston, R. (2014). Usability testing: A practical guide for librarians. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Germain, C. A., & Rorissa, A. (2011). Defining usability: How library practice differs from published research. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 11(2), 599–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Germain, C. A., & Yang, H. (2009). An exploration into the practices of library web usability in ARL academic libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 953–968. doi:10.1002/asi.21032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtois, M. P., Higgins, M. E., & Kapur, A. (2005). Was this guide helpful? Users' perceptions of subject guides. Reference Services Review, 33(2), 188–196. doi:10.1108/00907320510597381
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, M., & Pan, R. (2014). Snakes or ladders? Evaluating a LibGuides pilot at UCD library. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(5), 515–520. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintz, K., Farrar, P., Eshghi, S., Sobol, B., Naslund, J., Lee, T., et al. (2010). Letting students take the lead: A user-centred approach to evaluating subject guides. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5(4), 39–52. doi://dx.doi.org/10.18438/B87C94
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. S. (1987). Two models for providing library services to off-campus students in Wyoming. In B. M. Lessin (Ed.), The Off-campus Library Services Conference Proceedings (pp. 135–142). Mount Pleasant: Central Michigan University Press. Retrieved from https://www.cmich.edu/library/DLSPRoceedings/3rdOCLSCP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krug, S. (2010). Rocket surgery made easy. Berkeley: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, S. (2013). Don't make me think, revisited: A common sense approach to web usability (3rd ed.). Berkeley: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, H. V., & May, D. (2013). The library course page and instruction: Perceived helpfulness and use among students. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 18(2), 127–138. doi:10.1080/10875301.2013.804019
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. A., & Black, E. L. (2013). Embedding guides where students learn: Do design choices and librarian behavior make a difference? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 528–534. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, J. (2009). Library à la carte: Research and course guides made to order. College and Research Library News, 70, 280–283.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (2012). How many test users in a usability study? Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-many-test-users/
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, D. (2011). Subject guides in academic libraries: A user-centred study of uses and perceptions. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 35(4), 436–451. doi:10.1353/ils.2011.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittsley, K. A., & Memmott, S. (2012). Improving independent student navigation of complex educational web sites: An analysis of two navigation design changes in LibGuides. Information Technology & Libraries, 31(3), 52–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeb, B., & Gibbons, S. (2004). Students, librarians, and subject guides: Improving a poor rate of return. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(1), 123–130. doi:10.1353/pla.2004.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sinkinson, C., Alexander, S., Hicks, A., & Kahn, M. (2012). Guiding design: Exposing librarian and student mental models of research guides. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(1), 63–84. doi:10.1353/pla.2012.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonsteby, A., & DeJonghe, J. (2013). Usability testing, user-centered design, and LibGuides subject guides: A case study. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(1), 83–94. doi:10.1080/19322909.2013.747366
   Google Scholar
• Staley, S. M. (2007). Academic subject guides: A case study of use at San Jose State University. College & Research Libraries, 68(2), 119–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawatao, C., Hungerford, R., Ray, L., & Ward, J. L. (2010). LibGuides usability testing: Customizing a product to work for your users. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1773/17101
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Students enrolled in distance courses at the University of Wyoming [data file]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/IPEDS/datacenter/
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health & Human Services. (2006). Research-based web design & usability guidelines Retrieved from https://www.usability.gov/sites/default/files/documents/guidelines_book.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vileno, L. (2010). Testing the usability of two online research guides. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research, 5(2), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, C. M., & Norlin, E. (2001). Usability testing for library websites. Chicago: ALA Editions.
   Google Scholar