“I'm a Visual Learner so I like this”: Investigating Student and Faculty Tutorial Preferences

References

• About Guide on the Side | code.library. (2015). Retrieved from http://code.library.arizona.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Appelt, K. M., & Pendell, K. (2010). Assess and invest: Faculty feedback on library tutorials. College & Research Libraries, 71(3), 245–lpage253. doi:10.5860/0710245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, A., & Georgas, H. (2006). Using interactive technology to teach information literacy concepts to undergraduate students. Reference Services Review, 34(4), 491–497. doi:10.1108/00907320610716396
   Google Scholar
• Bowles-Terry, M., Hensley, M. K., & Hinchliffe, L. J. (2010). Best practices for online tutorials in academic libraries: A study of student preferences and understanding. Communications in Information Literacy, 4(1), 17. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/763599877.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgland, A., & Blanchard, P. (2001). Flexible delivery/flexible learning…Does it make a difference? Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 32(3), 177–191. doi:10.1080/00048623.2001.10755158
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. L., & Friehs, C. G. (2013). Video and HTML: Testing online tutorial formats with biology students. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(3), 292–304..
   Google Scholar
• Friehs, C. G., & Craig, C. L. (2008). Assessing the effectiveness of online library instruction with finance students. Journal of Web Librarianship, 2(4), 493–509. doi:10.1080/19322900802484438
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, B. M. (2014). Online tutorials and effective information literacy instruction for distance learners. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(1–2), 45–55. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2014.898011
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, T., & Gil-Trejo, L. (2016). Students weigh in: Usability test of online library tutorials. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 21(1–2), 1–21. doi:10.1080/10875301.2016.1164786
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh Webb, K., & Hoover, J. (2015). Universal design for learning (UDL) in the academic library: A methodology for mapping multiple means of representation in library tutorials. College & Research Libraries, 76(4), 537–553. doi:10.5860/crl.76.4.537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mery, Y., DeFrain, E., Kline, E., & Sult, L. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of tools for online database instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 70–81.
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, L. S. (2012). Student preference for tutorial design: A usability study. Reference Services Review, 40(2), 258–276. doi:10.1108/00907321211228318
   Google Scholar
• Michel, S. (2001). What do they really think? Assessing student and faculty perspectives of a web-based tutorial to library research. College & Research Libraries, 62(4), 317–332. doi:10.5860/crl.62.4.317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, S., & McMunn-Tetangco, E. (2014). Guide on the side: Testing the tool and the tutorials. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 19(3), 271–282. doi:10.1080/10875301.2014.948252
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheriff, G. (2017). Interactive tutorials—the platform matters: Learning from a comparative evaluation of tutorial platforms. College and Research Libraries News, 78(41) doi:10.5860/crln.78.4.9652
   Google Scholar
• Stonebraker, I. (2015). Specialized tutorials for specialized resources: Using interactive guide on the side tutorials for special libraries reference and instruction. Public Services Quarterly, 11(3), 232–236. doi:10.1080/15228959.2015.1060145
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., & Gosling, C. (2009). An evaluation of the use of “Guides at the side” web-based learning activities to equip students in health sciences and nursing with information literacy skills. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 15(2), 173–186. doi:10.1080/13614530903240486
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B., Fuchs, C., & Todman, A. (2015). Static vs. dynamic tutorials: Applying usability principles to evaluate online point-of-need instruction. Information Technology and Libraries (Online), 34(4), 30. doi:10.6017/ital.v34i4.5831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Meer, P. F., Perez-Stable, M. A., & Sachs, D. E. (2012). Framing a strategy: Exploring faculty attitudes toward library instruction and technology preferences to enhance information literacy. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 52(2), 109. doi:10.5860/rusq.52n2.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. (2009). Information literacy online tutorials: An introduction to rationale and technological tools in tutorial creation. The Electronic Library, 27(4), 684–693. doi:10.1108/02640470910979624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar