Transfer of Research through Academic Publishing and the Use of OA Resources: A Survey

References

• Baum, B., & Cohen, E. (2019). Evolution or revolution? Changing the way science is published and communicated. PLoS Biology, 17(6), e3000272 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk, B. (2017). Gold, green, and black open access. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 173–175. doi:10.1002/leap.1096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, A., & Brainard, J. (2019). University of California takes a stand on Open Access. Science (New York, N.Y.).), 363(6431), 1023 doi:10.1126/science.363.6431.1023-a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankland, J., & Ray, M. A. (2017). Traditional versus Open Access scholarly journal publishing: An economic perspective. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 49(1), 5–25. doi:10.3138/jsp.49.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, G. (2017). Making open access/open data/open science a reality. Against the Grain, 29(3), 24–25. doi:10.7771/2380-176X.7782
   Google Scholar
• James, J. E. (2020). Pirate Open Access as electronic civil disobedience: Is it ethical to breach the paywalls of monetized academic publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(12), 1500–1505. ? doi:10.1002/asi.24351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, J. E. (2017). Free-to-publish, free-to-read, or both? Cost, equality of access, and integrity in science publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(6), 1584–1589. doi:10.1002/asi.23757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutras, N. (2019). The evolving role of commercial publishers and the future of Open Access repositories: The potential of corporate social responsibility. Publishing Research Quarterly, 35(3), 391–417. doi:10.1007/s12109-019-09644-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung, F.-W. (2018). Exploring the SSCI phenomenon within the publish or perish principle for non-native English-speaking ELT professionals. TESL-EJ, 22(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lagoze, C., Edwards, P., Sandvig, C., & Plantin, J.C. (2018). Should I stay or should I go? Alternative infrastructures in scholarly publishing. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1052–1071.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. W. (2012). The inevitability of Open Access. College & Research Libraries, 73(5), 493–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin, J., & Sidaway, J. (2020). Commercial publishers: What is to be done?Geoforum, 112, 6–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padmalochanan, P. (2019). Academics and the field of academic publishing: Challenges and approaches. Publishing Research Quarterly, 35(1), 87–107. doi:10.1007/s12109-018-09628-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primary Research Group. (2016). International Survey of Research University Faculty : Use of Institutional Digital Repositories. New York: Primary Research Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, B., & Belluz, J. (2019, July 10). The war to free science: How librarians, pirates, and funders are liberating the world’s academic research from paywalls. Vox. https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/6/3/18271538/open-access-elsevier-california-sci-hub-academic-paywalls.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, K. (2016). Different from discipline to discipline diversity in the scholarly publication pystem. In The Future of Scholarly Publishing: Open Access and the Economics of Digitisation. Oxford: African Books Collective.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, F., Mongeon, P., Haustein, S., Siler, K., Alperin, J., & Larivière, V. (2018). Is it such a big deal? On the cost of journal use in the digital era. College & Research Libraries, 79(6), 785–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPARC. (2020, June 9). SPARC debrief on three recent big deal cancellations. SPARC. https://sparcopen.org/news/2020/sparc-debrief-on-three-recent-big-deal-cancellations/.
   Google Scholar
• Taubert, N., & Weingart, P. (2016). Changes in scientific publishing: A heuristic for analysis. In The future of scholarly publishing: Open access and the economics of digitisation. Oxford: African Books Collective.
   Google Scholar
• Tenopir, C., Dalton, D. E., Christian, L., Jones, K. M., McCabe, M., Smith, M., & Fish, A. (2017). Imagining a Gold Open Access future: Attitudes, behaviors, and funding scenarios among authors of academic scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 824–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heyden, M., & van Veen, T. (2018). Gold Open Access : The best of both worlds. Neth Heart J, 26(1), 3–4. doi:10.1007/s12471-017-1064-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walby, K., & Lippert, R. K. (2019). Academic publishing and corporatization: Reflections on professionalism, profits, and peculiarities of today’s presses and journals. Publishing Research Quarterly, 35(3), 362–376. doi:10.1007/s12109-019-09668-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. (2016). On the situation and development of academic libraries. In The future of scholarly publishing: Open access and the economics of digitisation. Oxford: African Books Collective.
   Google Scholar
• White, D. L., & Ohira, Y. (2016). Creating Green Open Access to institutional scholarship using digital commons. Kansas Library Association College & University Libraries Section Proceedings, 6(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Willinsky, J., & Rusk, M. (2019). If research libraries and funders finance Open Access: Moving beyond subscriptions and APCs. College & Research Libraries, 80(3), 340–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. (2020). Toward easy deposit: Lowering the barriers of Green Open Access with data integration and automation. Publications, 8(2), 28. doi:10.3390/publications8020028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar