The Other Side of Hope: Squandering Social Capital in Louisville’s HOPE VI

REFERENCES

• Bembry, J. X., & Norris, D. F. (2005). An exploratory study of neighborhood choices among Moving to Opportunity participants in Baltimore, Maryland: The influence of housing search assistance. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 32(4), 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. L. (2008). The role of social networks in making housing choices: The experience of the Gautreaux Two Residential Mobility Program. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 10(1), 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. L., Edin, K., Clampet-Lundquist S., & Duncan, G. J. (2010). The durability of gains from the Gautreaux Two Residential Mobility Program: A qualitative analysis of who stays and who moves from low-poverty neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 20(1), 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, P. C., & Smith, R. N. (1997). Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 3(2), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Buron, L. F., Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., Harris, L. E., & Khadduri, J. (2002). The HOPE VI resident tracking study: A snapshot of the current living situation of original residents from eight sites. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2010). Everyone had your back: Social ties, perceived safety, and public housing relocation. City & Community, 9(1), 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulton, C., & Pandey, S. (1990). Concentration of poverty and the changing ecology of low income, urban neighborhoods: An analysis of the Cleveland area. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 26(4), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, A. M. (2009). Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(3), 227–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 Pub. L.101–235, Tit. V (1989, December 15).
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 833–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., Mijanovich, T., & Dillman, K. (2001). Neighborhood effects on health: Exploring the links and assessing the evidence. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(3–4), 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, I., & Kilpatrick, S. (2000). What is social capital? A study of rural communities. Sociologica Ruralis, 40(1), 87–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J., Brazley, M., & Pan, Z. (2005). HOPE VI: A study of housing and neighborhood satisfaction. Sustain: A Journal of Environmental and Sustainability Issues,11(Fall/Winter), 40–50.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J., & Feins, J. (2003). Choosing a better life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, S., Hathaway, W., Rodriguez, C., Spalding A., & Ward, B. (2008). Deconcentration of social capital: Contradictions of a poverty alleviation policy. Journal of Poverty, 12(2), 201–228.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, J., & Falk, I. (1999). Measuring trust and community capacity: Social capital for the common good. Launceston, Tasmania: Centre for Research and Learning in Regional Australia.
   Google Scholar
• The Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, Pub. L. 102–550, Tit. I, Sect. 120 (1992, October 28).
   Google Scholar
• Housing Authority of Louisville. (2001). HOPE VI grant application. Louisville, KY: Louisville Metro Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Housing Authority of Louisville, Citizens of Louisville Organized and United Together, Legal Aid Society, Metropolitan Housing Coalition. (2001). Memorandum of understanding. Available from the authors.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn & G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. E., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (1992). The education and employment of low income black youth in white suburbs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(3), 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadduri, J. (2001). Deconcentration: What do we mean? What do we want? Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5(2), 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lebacqz, K. (1986). Six theories of justice: Perspectives from philosophical and theological ethics. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg.
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Moving to opportunity: An experimental study of neighborhood effects on mental health. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1576–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metropolitan Housing Coalition (MHC). (2003). State of Metropolitan Housing Report, 2003. Louisville, KY: Metropolitan Housing Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing. (August, 1992). The final report of the National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing: A report to the Congress and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB). (1986). Economic justice for all. Washington, DC: NCCB.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, L., Feins, J. D., Jacob, R., Beecroft, E., Sanbonmatsu, L., Katz, L. F., Liebman, J. B., & Kling, J. R. (2003). Moving to Opportunity interim impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, D. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. The American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Harris, L. E., & Cunningham, M. K. (2001). Families in transition: A qualitative analysis of the MTO experience, final report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunningham, M. K., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. A. (2004a). A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., Harris, L. E., Comey, J., Cunningham, M. K. & Buron, L. F. (2004b). The HOPE VI program: What about the residents? Housing Policy Debate, 15 (2), 385–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105–276, Tit. V, 535a (1998, October 21).
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, B. H., & Quane, J. M. (2000). Neighborhood poverty and the social isolation of inner city African American families. Social Forces, 79(1), 139–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E. (1995). Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux program. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 231–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosin, H. (2008, July/August). American murder mystery. The Atlantic, 40–54.
   Google Scholar
• Stansfeld, S. A. (2006). Social support and social cohesion. In M. Marmot & R. G. Wilkinson (Eds.), Social determinants of health (2nd ed., pp. 148–171). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, R., Barbee, A., & Patrick, D. (2008). Clarksdale HOPE VI revitalization baseline evaluation report. Louisville, KY: Louisville Metro Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, R., Dailey, A., Barbee, A., & Patrick, D. (2011). Clarksdale HOPE VI Community Supportive Services program evaluation: Final report, Louisville, KY: Louisville Metro Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Tutty, L. M., Rothery M., & Grinnell, R. (1996). Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps, & tasks. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. (1948, December 10). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. General Assembly resolution 217 A (III).
   Google Scholar
• Vick, J., & Norton, C. (2008). State of Metropolitan Housing Report, 2008. Louisville, KY: Metropolitan Housing Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• Vick, J., Poe, J., Sharia, N., Norton, C., & Brooks, L. (2010). State of Metropolitan Housing Report, 2010. Louisville, KY: Metropolitan Housing Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Weismann, G. (2006). Public housing’s Cinderella: Policy dynamic of HOPE VI in the mid-1990s. In L. Bennett, J. L. Smith, & P. A. Wright (Eds.), Where are poor people to live? Transforming public housing communities (pp. 41–67). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp.
   Google Scholar