Welfare and the Culture of Conservatism: A Contextual Analysis of Welfare-to-Work Participation in North Carolina

References

• Ahn, H. (2012). Child care subsidy, child care costs, and employment of low income single mothers. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(2), 379–387. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, V. (2000). Reducing welfare benefits: Consequences for adequacy of and eligibility for benefits. Social Work, 45(4), 300–311. doi:10.1093/sw/45.4.300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. D., Schulman, M., & Wood, P. J. (2001). Globalization and uncertainty: The restructuring of Southern textiles. Social Problems, 48, 478–498. doi:10.1525/sp.2001.48.4.478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, R. (2012). “Shift in welfare policy draws G.O.P. protests”. The New York Times (pp. A17). Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/18/us/politics/welfare-to-work-shift-angers-republicans.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Bishaw, A. (2013, September). Poverty: 2000-2012 ( American Community Survey Briefs). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acsbr12-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. B., & Lichter, D. T. (2004). Poverty, welfare, and the livelihood strategies of nonmetropolitan single mothers. Rural Sociology, 69(2), 282–301. doi:10.1526/003601104323087615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, I., & Misra, J. (2003). The intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 487–513. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204–225. doi:10.2307/2657415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnochan, S., & Austin, M. (2002). Implementing welfare reform and guiding organizational change. Administration in Social Work, 26(1), 61–77. doi:10.1300/J147v26n01_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T. C. (2009). Racial inequality in receiving transitional support services and being sanctioned among TANF recipients: A group threat hypothesis. Journal of Social Service Research, 35, 115–123. doi:10.1080/01488370802678835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. N., & Huffman, M. L. (2003). Individuals, jobs, and labor markets: The devaluation of women’s work. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 443–463. doi:10.2307/1519732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. L., & Mayer, V. (2010). Both hands tied: Welfare reform and the race to the bottom of the low-wage labor market. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (1997). On the logic and purpose of significance testing. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 161–172. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debertin, D. L., & Infanger, C. L. (1988). Rural poverty, welfare eligibility, farm programs and the negative income tax. Review of Policy Research, 7(4), 828–849. doi:10.1111/ropr.1988.7.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, D. F., Kum, H., & Flair, K. (2009). Management assistance for the work first program. Retrieved from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Jordan Institute for Families website http://ssw.unc.edu/ma/
   Google Scholar
• Edin, K., & Harris, K. M. (1999). Getting off and staying off: Racial differences in the work route off welfare. In B. Irene (Eds.), Latinas and African American women at work (pp. 270–301). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Work, welfare, and single mothers’ economic survival strategies. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 253–266. doi:10.2307/2657303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitchen, J. M. (1981). Poverty in rural America: A case study. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fording, R. C., Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (2007). Devolution, discretion, and the effect of local political views on TANF sanctioning. Social Service Review, 81(2), 285–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fording, R. C., Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (2011). Race and the local politics of punishment in the new world of welfare. American Journal of Sociology, 116(5), 1610–1657. doi:10.1086/657525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, M. (1996). ‘Race coding’ and white opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 593–604. doi:10.2307/2082611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooden, S. T., & Douglas, N. E. (2006). Ever present, sometimes acknowledged, but never addressed: Racial disparities in U.S. welfare policy. In K. M. Kilty & E. A. Segal (Eds.), The promise of welfare reform: Political rhetoric and the reality of poverty in the twenty-first century (pp. 207–222). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, J., & Hasenfeld, Y. (2007). Blame welfare, ignore poverty and inequality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harknett, K. (2001). Working and leaving welfare: Does race or ethnicity matter? Social Service Review, 75(3), 359–385. doi:10.1086/322219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. A., & Parisi, D. (2008). Forward looking behavior and time limits: How do rural TANF clients manage their welfare eligibility? Journal of Poverty, 12(3), 265–283. doi:10.1080/10875540802197851
   Google Scholar
• Hays, S. (2003). Flat broke with children: Women in the age of welfare reform. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschl, T. A., & Rank, M. R. (1999). Community effects on welfare participation. Sociological Forum, 14(1), 155–174. doi:10.1023/A:1021653131354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, M. D. (2007). Territories of inequality: An essay on the measurement and analysis of inequality in grounded place settings. In L. M. Lobao, G. Hooks, & A. R. Tickamyer (Eds.), The sociology of spatial inequalities (pp. 85–112). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschenman, J., & Neckerman, K. M. (1991). “We’d Love to hire them, but…”: The meaning of race for employers. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 110–132). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Lichter, D. T., & Jayakody, R. (2002). Welfare reform: How do we measure success? Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 117–141. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobao, L. (2004). Continuity and change in place stratification: Spatial inequality and middle range territorial units. Rural Sociology, 69(1), 1–30. doi:10.1526/003601104322919883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobao, L., & Kraybill, D. S. (2005). The emerging roles of county governments in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: Findings from a national survey. Economic Development Quarterly, 19(3), 245–259. doi:10.1177/0891242405276514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobao, L., & Saenz, R. (2002). Spatial inequality and diversity as an emerging research area. Rural Sociology, 67(4), 497–511. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. F., Rain, D. R., & Ratcliffe, M. R. (2001, August). Population density vs. urban population: Comparative GIS studies in China, India, and the United States. U.S. Census Bureau: Population division. Paper presented at “Population Applications of Spatial Analysis Systems (SIS)” at the IUSSP Conference in Salvador, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Luebke, P. (1998). Tar heel politics 2000. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manchester, C. F., & Mumford, K. J. (2009). How costly is welfare stigma? Separating psychological costs from time costs. AEA conference paper (unpublished), Purdue University, Krannert School of Management Working Paper 1229, December 5, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Monnat, S. (2010). The color of welfare sanctioning: Exploring the individual and contextual roles of race on TANF case closures and benefit reductions. Sociological Quarterly, 51(4), 678–707. doi:10.1111/tsq.2010.51.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnat, S. M., & Bunyan, L. A. (2008). Capitalism and welfare reform: Who really benefits from welfare-to-work policies? Race, Gender, and Class, 15(1/2), 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. K. (2006). Ongoing Challenges in the Understanding of Rural Poverty Journal of Poverty, 10(4), 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. K., & Smith, J. (1999). Working hard and making do: Surviving in small town America. Berkeley,CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 181–209. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi, D., McLaughlin, D. K., Grice, S. M., Taquino, M., & Gill, D. A. (2003). TANF participation rates: Do community conditions matter? Rural Sociology, 68, 491–512. doi:10.1111/ruso.2003.68.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, K., Harvey, M. H., Summers, G. F., & Mushinski, D. (2006). Welfare reform in persistent rural poverty: Dreams, disenchantments, and diversity. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rana, S. (2000). Restricting the rights of poor mothers: An international human rights critique of “Workfare”. Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 33(4), 393–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (1993). The link between population density and welfare participation. Demography, 30(4), 607–622. doi:10.2307/2061809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridzi, F. (2009). Selling welfare reform: Work-first and the new commonsense of employment. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Murphy, M. (2009). Welfare rules databook: State TANF policies as of 2008. The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://anfdata.urban.org/wrd/databook.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S. F. (2005). Contextualizing racial disparities in American welfare reform: Toward a new poverty research. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 253–265. doi:10.1017/S153759270505019X
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Houser, L. (2009). Deciding to discipline: Race, choice, and punishment at the frontlines of welfare reform. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 398–422. doi:10.1177/000312240907400304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seccombe, K. (1999). “So you think i drive a Cadillac?” Welfare recipients’ perspectives on the system and its reform. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, D. (2009, October 1). Pay for performance begins today for North Carolina’s work first participants. In NC department of health and human services. Retrieved from http://www.ncdhhs.gov/pressrel/2009/2009-10-1-workfirst.htm
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (2007). A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 111–127. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Department of Public Instruction and the State Board of Education in North Carolina. (n.d.). Social studies resources, NC maps. K-12 Standards and curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.dpi.state.nc.us/curriculum/socialstudies/elementary/studentsampler/20geography
   Google Scholar
• The North Carolina State Occupational Information Coordinating Committee [SOICC] Website. (2012). North Carolina career resource network. Retrieved from http://www.soicc.state.nc.us/soicc/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tickamyer, A. R., White, J. A., Tadlock, B. L., & Henderson, D. A. (2007). The spatial politics of public policy: Devolution, development, and welfare reform. In L. M. Lobao, G. Hooks, & A. R. Tickamyer (Eds.), The sociology of spatial inequality (pp. 113–139). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Roscigno, V. J. (1996). Racial economic subordination and white gain in the US South. American Sociological Review, 61, 565–589. doi:10.2307/2096394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Roscigno, V. J. (1997). Uneven development and local inequality in the US South: The role of outside investment, landed elites, and racial dynamics. Sociological Forum, 12, 565–597. doi:10.1023/A:1022174707289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacha-Haase, T., & Thompson, B. (1998). Further comments on statistical significance tests. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development (American Counseling Association), 31(1), 63–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. (2009). The new welfare bureaucrats: Entanglements of race, class, and policy reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. J. (1986). Southern capitalism: The political economy of North Carolina. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar