Overview of Issues Related to Coercion and Monitoring in Alternative Diversion Programs for Nurses: A Comparison to Drug Courts: Part 2

REFERENCES

• American Medical Association. Factors contributing to the health care cost problem. American Medical Association, Chicago 1993
   Google Scholar
• American Nurses Association. Addictions and psychological dysfunctions in nursing. American Nurses Association, Kansas City, MO 1984
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin L., Smith V. Relapse in chemically dependent nurses: Prevalence and contributing factors. National Council of State Boards of Nursing Issues 1994; 15(1)3–9
   Google Scholar
• Barnett N. P., Read J. P. Mandatory alcohol intervention for alcohol-abusing college students: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005; 29: 147–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckstead J. Modeling attitudinal antecedents of nurses' decisions to report impaired colleagues. Western Journal of Nursing Research 2002; 24(5)537–551
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belenko S. Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review 1998; 1(1)1–48
   Google Scholar
• Brown J. G., Smith L. Nurses in recovery: The burden of life problems and confidence to resist relapse. Journal of Addictions Nursing 2003; 14: 133–137
   Google Scholar
• Burns S. L., Peyrot M. Tough love: Nurturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts. Social Problems 2003; 50(3)416–438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butzin C. A., Saum C. A., Scarpitti F. R. Factors associated with completion of a drug treatment court diversion program. Substance use and Misuse 2002; 37(12 & 13)1615–1633
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Center for Substance Abuse Research (CESAR) University of Maryland, College Park. Majority of US residents with illicit drug and alcohol problems receive no treatment; Most feel treatment is not needed. October 6, 2003, CESAR fax, Vol. 2, Issue 40
   Google Scholar
• Clark C., Farnsworth J. Program for recovering nurses: An evaluation. MEDSURG Nursing 2006; 15(4)223–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark J., Leukefeld C., Godlaski T. Case management and behavioral contracting. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1999; 17(4)293–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combs R. H. Drug-impaired professionals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass 1997
   Google Scholar
• Crosby & Bissell. To care enough: Intervention with chemically dependent colleagues. Johnson Institute Books, Minneopolis 1989
   Google Scholar
• Crowley T. Contingency contracting treatment of drug-abusing physicians, nurses, and dentists. Behavioral intervention techniques in drug abuse treatment. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1988, Grabowski, Stitzer & Henningfield (Eds.), Monograph #46
   Google Scholar
• Darbro N. Substance abuse and nurses: A study of completers and non-completers in an alternative diversion program. Dissertation Abstracts International. 2003, (UMI No. 3081213)
   Google Scholar
• Darbro N. Alternative diversion program for nurses with impaired practice: Completers and non-completers. Journal of Addictions Nursing 2005; 16(4)169–185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Weert-Van Oene G., Schippers G., De Jong C., Schrijvers G. Retention in substance dependence treatment: The relevance of in-treatment factors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2001; 20(4)253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke L., Zsohar H. Monitoring nurses with license probation. National Council of State Boards of Nursing annual meeting sessions. 1995; 1–19
   Google Scholar
• Egbert S. C., Church W. T., Byrnes E. C. Justice and treatment collaboration: A process evaluation of a drug court. Best Practices in Mental Health 2006; 2(1)74–91
   Google Scholar
• Farabee D., Prendergast, Anglin M. D. The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation 1998; 62(1)3–10
   Google Scholar
• Finke L. M., Williams J., Stanley R. Nurses referred to a peer assistance Program for alcohol and drug problems. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 1996; 10(5)319–324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher C., Ronis D. Satisfaction of impaired health care professionals with Mandatory treatment and monitoring. Journal of Addictive Diseases 2005; 24(3)61–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis R. J., Miller S. I. Clinical textbook of addictive disorders. Guilford Press, New York 1998
   Google Scholar
• Ganley O., Pendergast W., Wilkerson M., Mattingly D. Outcome study of Substance impaired physicians and physician assistants under contract with North Carolina Physicians Health Program for the period 1995–2000. Journal of Addictive Diseases 2005; 24(1)1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George W., Joe D., Simpson D., Broome K. Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction 1998; 93(8)534–549
   Google Scholar
• Gorski T. Passages through recovery: An action plan for preventing relapse. Hazeldon, Century City, MN 1989
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M., Stephens S., Steward D., Marshall J., Bearn J., Strang J. Health care professionals referred for treatment for alcohol and drug problems. Alcohol and Alcoholism 2001; 36(2)160–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson D. C., Kearly B. W., Najaka S. S., Rocha C. M. How drug courts work: An analysis of mediators. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency 2007; 44(1)3–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire T. K., Burke A. C. The relationship of legal coercion to readiness to change among adults with alcohol and other drug problems. Journal of. Substance Abuse Treatment 2004; 26: 35–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith J. Substance abuse disorders in nurses. Nursing Forum 1999; 34(4)19–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haack M. R., Yocum C. J. State policies and nurses with substance use disorders. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2002; 41(1)89–94
   Google Scholar
• Hanks L., Bissell L. Health professionals. Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook, J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Milkman. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 1992; 897–908
   Google Scholar
• Harrell A., Roman J. Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: The impact of graduated sanctions. Journal of Drug Issues 2001; 31(1)207–232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn J. R., Harvey A. N. The effect of the threat of legal sanction on program retention and completion: Is that why they stay in drug court?. Crime & Delinquency 2007; 53(2)255–280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins S., Petry N. Contingency management: Incentives for sobriety. Alcohol Research & Health 1999; 23(2)122–127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills V. Interventions with the substance-abusing nurse. Treatment choices for alcoholism and substance abuse, H. Milkman, L. Sederer. DC Health, Lexington, MA 1990; 341–355
   Google Scholar
• Hiller M. L., Knight K., Leukefeld C., Simpson S. S. Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2002; 29(1)56–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood J. C., Duphorne P. L. To report or not to report: Nurses' attitudes toward reporting co-workers suspected of substance abuse. Journal of Drug Issues 1995; 25(2)313–339
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston C. W., Freeman-Wilson K., Marlowe D. B., Roussell A. Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving court programs in the Unites States. National Drug Court Institute 2005; 1(2), www.ndci.org U. S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Hughes T., Smith L., Howard M. Florida's Intervention Project for Nurses: A description of recovering nurses' reentry to practice. Journal of Addictions Nursing 1998; 10(2)63–69
   Google Scholar
• Jocobson J. Place and attrition from substance abuse treatment. Journal of Drug Issues 2006; 34(1)23–49
   Google Scholar
• Join Together, National Policy Panel. Ending discrimination against people with alcohol and drug problems. 2003, www.jointogether.org/discrimination
   Google Scholar
• Kelly J. F., Finney J. W., Moos R. Substance use disorder patients who are mandated to treatment: Characteristics, treatment process, and 1-and 5-year outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005; 28: 213–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler R. C., Warner L. A., Nelson C. B., Schulenberg J., Anthony J. C. Lifetime co-occurance of DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence with other psychiatric disorders in the National Co-Morbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1997; 54: 313–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klag S., O'Callaghan F., Creed P. The use of legal coercion in the treatment of substance abusers: An overview and critical analysis of thirty years of research. Substance Use and Misuse. 2005; 40: 1777–1795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski C., Rancourt M. P. Profile of the nurse participating in a substance abuse program of a board of registration in nursing in a New England state. Journal of Addictions Nursing 1997; 9(1)22–29
   Google Scholar
• Leshner A. Science-based views of drug addiction and its treatment. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999; 282: 1314–1316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshner A. Addiction is a brain disease. Issues in Science and Technology 2001, http://www.issues.org/issues/17.3/leshner.htm Online, Spring, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Lillibridge J., Cox M., Cross W. Uncovering the secret: Giving voice to the experiences of nurses who misuse substances. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2002; 39(3)219–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist C., Krebs C., Lattimore P. Sanctions and rewards in drug court programs: Implementation, perceived efficacy, and decision making. Journal of Drug Issues 2006; 36(1)119–146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markland D., Ryan R., Tobin V., Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 2005; 24(6)811–831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe D. B., Merikle E. P., Kirby K. C., Festinger D. S., MacLellan A. T. Multidemensional assessment of perceived treatment-entry pressures among substance abusers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2001; 15: 97–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall G., Hser Y. Characteristics of criminal justice and noncriminal justice clients receiving treatment for substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors 2001; 27(2)179–192
   Google Scholar
• Miller N. S., Flaherty J. A. Effectiveness of coerced addiction treatment (alternative consequences): A review of the clinical research. Journal of. Substance Abuse Treatment 2000; 18: 9–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller P. Support systems of nurses recovering from chemical dependency: A pilot study. Holistic Nursing Practice 1997; 11(4)56–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller W. R., Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change, 2nd ed. Guilford Press, New York 2002
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals, Facts on drug courts. 2001, Accessed May 22, 2007 at www.Nadcp.org/whatis/
   Google Scholar
• National Council of State Boards of Nursing. Chemical dependency handbook for nurse managers. Author, Chicago, IL 2001
   Google Scholar
• National Criminal Justice Reference Service. In the spotlight: Drug courts. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000, NIAAA, Tenth Special Report to the US Congress on Alcohol and Health
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide. 1999, NIH Publication N. 00-4180
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Justice. Drug courts: The second decade. U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC 2006, Retrieved 6-08 www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij Special report
   Google Scholar
• New Mexico Board of Nursing. Administrative rules of the board of nursing, Diversion Program for Chemically Dependent Nurses. 2007, Retrieved June 18, 2007 from www.bon.state.nm.us/ 16.12.2.16 NMAC
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien C. P., McLellan T. A. Myths about the treatment of addiction. Lancet 1996; 347(8996)237–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace E. P. Achievement and addiction: A guide to the treatment of professionals. Brunner/Mazel Publishers, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Polcin D. L. Drug and alcohol offenders coerced into treatment: A review of modalities and suggestions for research on social model programs. Substance Use and Misuse 2001; 36(5)598–608
   Google Scholar
• Polcin D. L., Weisner C. Factors associated with coercion in entering treatment for alcohol problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1999; 54: 63–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollini R. A., O'Toole T. P., Ford D., Bigelow G. Does this patient really want treatment? Factors associated with baseline and evolving readiness for change among hospitalized substance using adults interested in treatment. Addictive Behaviors 2006; 31: 1904–1918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C., Norcross J. C. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist 1992; 47(9)1102–1114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan D. Impaired nursing practice: A national perspective on peer assistance. Journal of Addictions Nursing. 2003; 14: 149–155
   Google Scholar
• Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Substance abuse: The nation's number one health problem. Institute for Health Policy, Brandeis University, Princeton, NJ 1993, Institute for Health Policy
   Google Scholar
• Roll J. M., Prendergast M., Richardson K., Burdon W., Ramirez A. Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2005; 31: 641–656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan R. M., Plant R. W., O'Malley S. Initial motivations for alcohol treatment: Relations with patient characteristics, treatment involvement and dropout. Addictive Behaviors 1995; 20(3)279–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satel S. Drug treatment: The case for coercion. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D. C. 1999
   Google Scholar
• Satel S., Farabee D. The role of coercion in drug treatment. Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook, J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, J. G. Langrod. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 2005; 690–706
   Google Scholar
• Shaw M., McGovern M., Angres D., Rawal P. Physicians and nurses with substance use disorders. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004; 47(5)561–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindelar J. L., Fiellin D. A. Innovations in treatment for drug abuse: Solutions to a public health problem. Annual Review of Public Health. 2001; 22: 249–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith L. L., Hughes T. L. Re-Entry: When a chemically dependent colleague returns to work. American Journal of Nursing 1996; 96(2)32–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith L., Taylor B. B., Hughes T. L. Effective peer responses to impaired nursing practice. Nursing Clinics of North America 1998; 33(1)105–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark M. J. Dropping out of substance abuse treatment: A clinically oriented review. Clinical Psychology Review. 1992; 12: 93–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2002 National survey on drug use and health: National findings. 2003, (Office of Applied Studies, NHSDA Series H-22, DHHS Publication N. SMA 03-3836). Rockville, MD
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings. Office of Applied Studies, Rockville, MD 2006, Accessed May 2, 2008 at http://www.drugabusestatistics.samhsa.gov 2007
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan E., Bissell L., Leffler D. Drug use and disciplinary actions among 300 nurses. The International Journal of the Addictions 1990; 25(4)375–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supples J. M. Self-regulation in the nursing profession: Response to substandard practice. Nursing Outlook 1993; 41(1)20–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talbott D., Gallegos K., Angres D. Impairment and recovery in physicians and other health care professionals. Principles of addiction medicine, A. Grahm, T. Schultz. American Society of Addiction Medicine, Chevy Chase, MD 1998; 1263–1279
   Google Scholar
• Talbott D., Wilson P. Physicians and other health professionals. Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook, J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, J. G. Langrod. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 2005; 1187–1202
   Google Scholar
• Tighe E., Saxe L. Community-based substance abuse reduction and the gap between treatment need and treatment utilization: Analysis of data from the “Fighting Back” general population survey. Journal of Drug Issues 2006; 36(2)165–186
   Google Scholar
• Valliant G. E. Natural history of addiction and pathways to recovery. Principles of addiction medicine, A. W. Graham, T. K. Schultz. American Society of Addiction Medicine, Chevy Chase, MD 1998; 295–308
   Google Scholar
• West M. W. A kaleidoscopic review of literature about substance abuse impairment in nursing: Progress toward identification of early risk indicators. Journal of Addictions Nursing. 2003; 14: 139–144
   Google Scholar
• Wild T. C. Social control and coercion in addiction treatment: Towards evidence-based policy and practice. Addiction. 2005; 101: 40–49
   Google Scholar
• Wild T. C., Cunningham J. A., Ryan R. M. Social pressure, coercion, and client engagement at treatment entry: A self-determination theory perspective. Addictive Behaviors. 2006; 31: 1858–1872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild T. C., Roberts A. B., Cooper E. L. Compulsory substance abuse treatment: An overview of recent findings and issues. European Addiction Research. 2002; 8: 84–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winick B. J., Wexler D. B. Therapeutic jurisprudence. Principles of addiction medicine, A. Graham, T. T. Schultz, M. Mayo-Smith, R. Ries, B. Wilford. American Society of Addiction Medicine, Chevy Chase, MD 2003; 550–552
   Google Scholar
• Wolfgang A. P. Job stress in the health professions: A study of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. Behavioral Medicine 1988; 10: 43–47
   Google Scholar
• Yocum C. J., Hack M. R. A comparison of two regulatory approaches to the management of chemically dependent nurses. National Council of State Boards of Nursing 1996, Interim Report
   Google Scholar
• Young D. Impacts of perceived legal pressure on retention in drug treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2002; 29(1)27–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young D., Belenko S. Program retention and perceived coercion in three models of mandatory drug treatment. Journal of Drug Issues 2002; 297–328, (Winter 2002)
   Google Scholar