Spelling Errors Impede Recognition of Correctly Spelled Word Forms

References

• Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Kuperman, V., & Bertram, R. (2010). Frequency effects in compound processing. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Compounding (pp. 257–270). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Durdevic, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118(3), 438–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balling, L. W., & Baayen, R. H. (2012). Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words. Cognition, 125(1), 80–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, M., Hale, J., Kliegl, R., Patil, U., & Vasishth, S. (2008). Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernestus, M. (2014). Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua, 142(2), 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Falkauskas, K., & Kuperman, V. (2015). When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 41(6), 1607–1627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Are there orthographic impairments in phonological dyslexia? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(1), 71–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1990). Generalized additive models (Vol. 43). London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hersch, J., & Andrews, S. (2012). Lexical quality and reading skill: Bottom-up and top- down contributions to sentence processing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 40–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). Effects of word frequency and spelling–to–sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1), 166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., & Bertram, R. (2013). Moving spaces: Spelling alternation in English noun-noun compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 939–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Drieghe, D., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 563–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., & Holschneider, M. (2015). Smoothing spline ANOVA decomposition of arbitrary splines: An application to eye movements in reading. PloS One, 10(3), e0119165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milin, P., Kuperman, V., Kostic, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Paradigms bit by bit: An information theoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and derivation. In J. P. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds,), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition (pp. 214–252). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Gordon, P. C. (2015). Reading ability and print exposure: Item response theory analysis of the author recognition test. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1095–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson Taylor, J., & Perfetti, C. A. (2016). Eye movements reveal readers’ lexical quality and reading experience. Reading and Writing, 29(6), 1069–1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In D. Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of Functional Literacy, 11, 67–86.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Fakou, A., Drakopoulou, S., Skaloumbakas, C., & Mouzaki, A. (2013). What do spelling errors tell us? Classification and analysis of errors made by Greek schoolchildren with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 26(5), 615–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S. M. (2013). Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech. Language, 89(4), 760–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory, 2, 64–99.
   Google Scholar
• Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2013). A reduced redundancy USENET corpus (2005-2011). University of Alberta, 39(4), 850–863.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgeson, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: ProEd.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R. H., & Van Rijn, H. (2015). itsadug: Interpreting time series, autocorrelated data using gamms. R Package, Version, 1(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2006). On confidence intervals for generalized additive models based on penalized regression splines. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 48(4), 445–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 73(1), 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar