What is the letter é?

References

• Adelman, J. S. (2011). Letters in time and retinotopic space. Psychological Review, 118, 570–582. doi:10.1037/a0024811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1. doi:10.5334/joc.10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chetail, F., & Boursain, E. (2019). Shared or separated representations for letters with diacritics? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 347–352. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1503-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. doi:10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1246–1258. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124. doi:10.3758/BF03195503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gomez, P., Perea, M., & Ratcliff, R. (2013). A diffusion model account of masked versus unmasked priming: Are they qualitatively different? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1731–1740. doi:10.1037/a0032333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (2018). Orthographic processing: A “mid-level” vision of reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 335–359. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Rey, A., & Dufau, S. (2008). Letter perception: From pixels to pandemonium. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 381–387. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannagan, T., & Grainger, J. (2013). Learning Diagnostic Features: The Delta Rule does Bubbles. Journal of Vision, 13, 17–17. doi:10.1167/13.8.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, D. (1985). Metamagical themas: Questing for the essence of mind and pattern. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1991). Automatic letter priming in an alphabetic decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 43–52. doi:10.3758/bf03211615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 627–633. doi:10.3758/brm.42.3.627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Araújo, V., & Nazzi, T. (2008). Differential processing of consonants and vowels in lexical access through reading. Psychological Science, 19, 1223–1227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02228.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., & Grainger, J. (2011). On letter frequency effects. Acta Psychologica, 138, 322–328. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation–Verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573–594. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.5.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Real Academia Española. (2010). Ortografía de la lengua española [Orthography of Spanish]. Madrid, Spain: Espasa Calpe.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, T., & McCloskey, M. (2013). Prelexical representations and processes in reading: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 30, 360–395. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.880677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, I. C., Mousikou, P., Montoya, J. M., & Defior, S. (2012). A letter visual-similarity matrix for Latin-based alphabets. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 431–439. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0271-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, C., Content, A., & Chetail, F. (2017). BACS: The brussels artificial character sets for studies in cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 2093–2112. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0844-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, R. W., & Rapp, B. (2018). From complexity to distinctiveness: The effect of expertise on letter perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 974–984. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1550-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar