When Slower is Faster: Time Spent Decoding Novel Words Predicts Better Decoding and Faster Growth

References

• Baker, L., Fernandez-Fein, S., Scher, D., & Williams, H. (1998). Home experiences related to the development of word recognition. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 263–287). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A. (2003). The classic study on poor children’s fourth-grade slump. American Educator, 27(1), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollaghan, C. A. (1987). Fast mapping in normal and language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52(3), 218–222. doi:10.1044/jshd.5203.218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005a). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005b). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2013). Item response theory. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 37–55. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D. J., Kulesz, P. A., & Benoit, J. S. (2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: The complete view of reading (CVRi). Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 274–288. doi:10.1177/0741932518772904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74–111. doi:10.3102/0034654313499616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, D., Wise, J. C., Morris, R., Fredrick, L. D., Rodrigo, V., Nanda, A. O., & Pae, H. K. (2011). A randomized control study of instructional approaches for struggling adult readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(2), 101–117. doi:10.1080/19345747.2011.555288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106(3), 491–528. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a Direct and Indirect Effect Model of Reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. R., Desrochers, A., Roth, L., & Lai, S. S. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(2), 103–110. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCandliss, B., Beck, I. L., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the word building intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 75–104. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGA & CCSSO. (2010). Common core state standards initiative: About the standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. T. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (Vol. 11, pp. 67–86). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., & Sarkar, D. (2017). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). How do we study “What happens next”? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602(1), 131–144. doi:10.1177/0002716205280900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogosa, D., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 726–748. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., Wang, Z., & O’Reilly, T. (2018). Relating reading comprehension to oral reading performance in the NAEP fourth‐Grade special study of oral reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 253–271. doi:10.1002/rrq.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., Weeks, J., O’Reilly, T., Bruce, K., Steinberg, J., & Chao, S.-F. (2019). SARA reading components tests, RISE forms: Technical adequacy and test design, 3rd edition (Research report no. RR-19-36). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. doi:10.1002/ets2.12269
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J. P., Shore, J., Holtzman, S., & Scarborough, H. S. (2011). Relative effectiveness of reading intervention programs for adults with low literacy. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(2), 118–133. doi:10.1080/19345747.2011.555290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (2005). Connectionist models of word reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 238–242. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72(2), 95–129. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaywitz, S. E. (1998). Dyslexia. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(5), 307–312. doi:10.1056/NEJM199801293380507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 23–55. doi:10.1177/0022057409189001-204
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., & Weeks, J. (2019). Decoding and reading comprehension: A test of the Decoding Threshold Hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 387–401. doi:10.1037/edu0000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar