Determining the number of factors in P-technique factor analysis

References

• Anderson, T. W. (1963). The use of factor analysis in the statistical analysis of multiple time series. Psychometrika, 28, 1–25. doi:10.1007/BF02289543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudeucel, A. (2001). On the generalizability of factors: The influence of changing contexts of variables on different methods of factor extraction. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 6, 69–96.
   Google Scholar
• Beltz, A. M., Beekman, C., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Buss, K. A. (2015). Mapping temporal dynamics in social interactions with unified structural equation modeling: A description and demonstration revealing time-dependent sex differences in play behavior. Applied Developmental Science, 17, 152–168. doi:10.1080/10888691.2013.805953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P., & Wu, E. (1995). EQS for Windows user's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
   Google Scholar
• Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1998). The Big Five as states: How useful is the five-factor model to describe intraindividual variations over time? Journal of Personality Research, 32, 202–221. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2005). Representing psychological processes with dynamic factor models: some promising uses and extensions of ARMA time series models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Psychometrics: A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 415–452). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. G., Bierman, K. L., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2015). Individual day-to-day process of social anxiety in vulnerable college students. Applied Developmental Science, 20, 1–15. doi:10.1080/10888691.2015.1026594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1952). P-technique factorization and the determination of individual dynamic structure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 8(1), 5–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1963). The structuring of change by P-technique and incremental R-technique. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K. S., & Rhymer, R. M. (1947). P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysical source traits in a normal individual. Psychometrika, 12, 267–288. doi:10.1007/BF02288941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., Ferrer, E., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2007). An unscented Kalman filter approach to the estimation of nonlinear dynamical systems models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(2), 283–321. doi:10.1080/00273170701360423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, S.-M., Zu, J., Shifren, K., & Zhang, G. (2011). Dynamic factor analysis models with time-varying parameters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 303–339. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.563697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayles, J. G., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2013). The utility of person-specific analyses for investigating developmental processes: An analytic primer on studying the individual. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 549–562. doi:10.1177/0165025413504857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. (1988). Relation to sample size and stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149–161. doi:10.1007/BF02289162
   Google Scholar
• Hakstian, A. R., Rogers, W. T., & Cattell, R. B. (1982). The behavior of number-of-factor rules with simulated data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 193–219. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Dolan, C. V., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2002). On the nature of SEM estimates of ARMA parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 347–368. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Dolan, C. V., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2005). Statistical modeling of the individual: Rationale and application of multivariate stationary time series analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 207–233. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 139–164. doi:10.1177/014662168500900204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, K., Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (2007). On the likelihood ratio test for the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 505–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. J., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1990). Multivariate, replicated, single-subject designs and P-technique factor analysis: A selective review of the literature. Experimental Aging Research, 16, 171–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1977). Factor analysis by least-squares and maximum-likelihood methods. In K. Enslein, A. Ralston, & H. S. Wilf (Eds.), Statistical methods for digital computers (pp. 125–153). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. doi:10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelderman, H., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2007). The effect of individual differences in factor loadings on the standard factor model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 435–456. doi:10.1080/00273170701382997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Ed.), The handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 1–17). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2011). The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 340–364. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.564527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L., & Mintz, J. (1972). The contribution of P-technique to personality, psychotherapy, and psychosomatic research. In R. M. Dreger (Ed.), Multivariate personality research: Contributions to the understanding of personality in honor of Raymond B. Cattell (pp. 387–410). Baton Rouge, LA: Claitor's Publishing Division.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 50, 181–202. doi:10.1007/BF02294246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (1997). Time series analysis and its relationship with longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 18, S232–S237. doi:10.1055/s-2007-972720
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P.C.M. (1999). Comment on fitting MA time series by structural equation models. Psychometrika, 64, 91–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (2003). State space techniques in structural equation modeling: Transformation of latent variables in and out of latent variable models. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://www.hhdev.psu.edu/hdfs/faculty/pubs/StateSpaceTechniques.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218. doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychology, 18(2), 112–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). The relationship between the structure of inter-individual and intraindividual variability: A theoretical and empirical vindication of developmental systems theory. In U. M. Staudinger & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding human development (pp. 339–360). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2009). The recoverability of P–technique factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 130–141. doi:10.1080/00273170802620204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2012). Merging the idiographic filter with dynamic factor analysis to model process. Applied Developmental Science, 16, 210–219. doi:10.1080/10888691.2012.722884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2014). New trends in the inductive use of relational developmental systems theory. In P. C. M. Molenaar, R. M. Lerner, & K. M. Newell (Eds.), Handbook of developmental systems theory & methodology (pp. 442–462). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., & Ram, N. (2009). Advances in dynamic factor analysis of psychological processes. In J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Molenaar, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & N. Chaudary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 255–268). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nesselroade, J. R., & Ford, D. H. (1985). P-technique comes of age: Multivariate, replicated, single-subject designs for research on older adults. Research on Aging, 7, 46–80. doi:10.1177/0164027585007001003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesselroade, J. R., & Ram, R. (2004). Stuying inraindividual variability: What we have learned that will help us understand lives in context. Research in Human Development, 1, 9–29. doi:10.1080/15427609.2004.9683328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Overton, W. F. (2013). Relationism and relational developmental systems: A paradigm for developmental science in the post-Cartesian era. In R. M. Lerner & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Advances in child development and Behavior. Vol. 44: Embodiment and epigenesis: Theoretical and methodological issues in understanding the role of biology within the relational developmental system, Part A: Philosophical, theoretical, and biological dimensions (pp. 24–64). London, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, S., & Amemiya, Y. (2005). Correlated samples with fixed and nonnormal latent variables. The Annals of Statistics, 33, 2732–2757. doi:10.1214/009053605000000570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43. doi:10.1207/S15328031US0201_02
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Zhang, G., Kim, C., & Mels, G. (2013). Choosing the optimal number of factors in exploratory factor analysis: A model selection perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 28–56. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.710386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiche, G., Riopel, M., & Blais, J. G. (2006). Non graphical solutions for the Cattell's scree test. Paper presented at the International Annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Rovine, M. J., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Corneal, S. E. (1999). Analysis of emotional response patterns for adolescent stepsons using P-technique factor analysis. In R. K. Silbereisen & A. von Eye (Eds.), Growing up in times of social change (pp. 261–285). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J., Nora, A., Stage, F., Barlow, E., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Education Research, 99, 323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J., & Lind, J. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Gronigen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Takane, Y., van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Browne, M. W. (2003). On likelihood ratio tests for dimensionality selection. In T. Higuchi, Y. Iba, & M. Ishiguro (Eds.), Proceedings of science of modeling: The 30th anniversary meeting of the information criterion (AIC) (pp. 348–349). Tokyo, Japan: Institute of Statistical Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. doi:10.1007/bf02293557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevon, M., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: Idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111–122. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E. L., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2008). Comparisons of four methods for estimating dynamic factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15(3), 377–402. doi:10.1080/10705510802154281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1982). Factors influencing four rules for determining the number of components to retain. Multivariaie Behavioral Research, 17, 253–269. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar