Individuality matters for substrate-size preference in the Nile tilapia juveniles

References

• Bartoshuk, L. M., Harned, M. A., & Parks, L. H. (1971). Taste of water in the cat: Effects on sucrose preference. Science, 171, 699–701. doi:10.1126/science.171.3972.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basolo, A. L. (1990). Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science, 250, 808–810. doi:10.1126/science.250.4982.808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. A., & Barber, I. (2000). Limitations to colour-based sexual preferences in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 47, 413–416. doi:10.1007/s002650050684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, W. J., Caplen, G., Edgar, J., Wilson, L. R., & Nicol, C. J. (2010). Consistency, transitivity and inter-relationships between measures of choice in environmental preference tests with chickens. Behavioural Processes, 83, 72–78. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2009.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M. S. (2006). Through animal eyes: What behaviour tells us. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100, 4–10. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, R. H. A., Negrão, C. A., Felício, A. K. C., & Volpato, G. L. (2014). Eye darkening as a reliable, easy and inexpensive indicator of stress in fish. Zoology, 117, 179–184. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2013.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, R. H. A., & Volpato, G. L. (2013). Motivation and time of day affect decision-making for substratum granulometry in the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 29, 239–241. doi:10.1111/jai.2012.29.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girguis, P. R., & Lee, R. W. (2006). Thermal preference and tolerance of alvinellids. Science, 312, 231. doi:10.1126/science.1125286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, J. J., & Dugatkin, L. A. (1995). Variability and repeatability of female mating preference in the guppy. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1427–1433. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)90063-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, D. M., & Oliveira, R. F. (2003). Time spent close to a sexual partner as a measure of female mate preference in a sex-role-reversed population of the blenny Salaria pavo (Risso) (Pisces: Blenniidae). Acta Ethologica, 6, 1–5. doi:10.1007/s10211-003-0083-8
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. (1964). Simultaneous confidence intervals for contrasts among multinomial populations. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35, 716–725. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703569
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. (1965). On simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions. Technometrics, 7, 247–254. doi:10.1080/00401706.1965.10490252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson, J. I., Carlsson, M., & Sundström, L. F. (2000). Habitat preference increases territorial defence in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 373–377. doi:10.1007/s002650000244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrinaga, A. R. (2011). Inter-specific and intra-specific variability in fruit color preference in two species of Turdus. Integrative Zoology, 6, 244–258. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4877.2011.00249.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, K., Lerner, A., & Shashar, N. (2014). Mate choice and body pattern variations in the Crown Butterfly fish Chaetodon paucifasciatus (Chaetodontidae). Biology Open, 3, 1245–1251. doi:10.1242/bio.20149175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, W. B., & Lu, X. (2009). Male mate choice in the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi: A preference for larger females. Journal of Ethology, 27, 413–417. doi:10.1007/s10164-008-0135-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia, C. M., & Volpato, G. L. (2016). A history-based method to estimate animal preference. Scientific Reports, 6, 28328. doi:10.1038/srep28328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça, F. Z., & Gonçalves-de-Freitas, E. (2008). Nest deprivation and mating success in Nile tilapia (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Revista Brasileira De Zoologia, 25, 413–418. doi:10.1590/S0101-81752008000300005
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça, F. Z., Volpato, G. L., Costa-Ferreira, R. S., & Gonçalves-de-Freitas, E. (2010). Substratum choice for nesting in male Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Journal of Fish Biology, 77, 1439–1445. doi:10.1111/jfb.2010.77.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, B. A., Manderson, J. P., Stoner, A. W., & Bejda, A. J. (2001). Size-related shifts in the habitat associations of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus): Field observations and laboratory experiments with sediments and prey. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 257, 297–315. doi:10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00340-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlupp, I., Waschulewski, M., & Ryan, M. J. (1999). Female preferences for naturally occurring novel male traits. Behaviour, 136, 519–527. doi:10.1163/156853999501450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner, A. W., & Abookire, A. A. (2002). Sediment preferences and size-specific distribution of young-of-the-year Pacific halibut in an Alaska nursery. Journal of Fish Biology, 61, 540–559. doi:10.1111/jfb.2002.61.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin, M. S., Farzana, A., Fatema, M. K., Azim, M. E., Wahab, M. A., & Verdegem, M. C. J. (2007). Technical evaluation of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) monoculture and tilapia-prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) polyculture in earthen ponds with or without substrates for periphyton development. Aquaculture, 269, 232–240. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.05.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, M. M., & Hart, P. J. B. (2004). Substrate discrimination and preference in foraging fish. Animal Behaviour, 68, 1071–1077. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfgang, F., & Birkhead, T. R. (2004). Repeatability of mate choice in the zebra finch: Consistency within and between females. Animal Behaviour, 68, 1017–1028. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar