Consumer Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare-Friendly Products and Willingness to Pay: Exploration of Mexican Market Segments

References

• Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2017).The business benchmark on farm animal welfare 2016 Report. Business benchmark on farm animal welfare, BBFAW, London, UK. Accessed on 15 June 2017. Retrieved from https://www.bbfaw.com/media/1450/bbfaw-2016-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ariztía, T., Kleine, D., Maria das Graças, S. L., Agloni, N., Afonso, R., & Bartholo, R. (2014). Ethical consumption in Brazil and Chile: Institutional contexts and development trajectories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 84–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin, T., & Thach, L. (2012). Millennial wine consumers: Risk perception and information search. Wine Economy Policy, 1(1), 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, N., Goodman, R. J., & Goh, B. K. (2011). Restaurant consumers repeat patronage: Service quality concern. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), 329–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basha, M. B., Mason, C., Shamsudin, M. F., Hussain, H. I., & Salem, M. A. (2015). Consumers attitude towards organic food. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 444–452.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, S. M., Fearrington, M. E., Davenport, S. W., & Bergman, J. Z. (2011). Millennials, narcissism, and social networking: What narcissists do on social networking sites and why. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 706–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, B, & van Leeuwen, F. (2005). Socio-political and market developments of animal welfare schemes. In Roex, J. & Miele, M(Eds.), Farm animal welfare concerns, consumers, retailers and producers – WelfareQuality® reports no.1, pp. 115–167. Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. S., & Vergragt, P. J. (2016). From consumerism to wellbeing: Toward a cultural transition? Journal of Cleaner Production, 132(20), 308–317.
   Google Scholar
• Caklová, K., & Ulčák, Z. (2014). Organic meat consumers and their awareness of animal welfare as reflected by purchase preferences. In Book of proceedings: Fifth International Scientific Agricultural Symposium “Agrosym 2014,” Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 23-26, 2014 (pp. 958–964). Lukavica, Bosnia and Herzegovina: Faculty of Agriculture, University of East Sarajevo.
   Google Scholar
• Cembalo, L., Caracciolo, F., Lombardi, A., Del Giudice, T., Grunert, K. G., & Cicia, G. (2016). Determinants of individual attitudes toward animal welfare-friendly food products. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COESPO. (2015). El Cambio Demográfico como Impulsor del Desarrollo. Consejo Estatal de Población. Toluca, México: Gobierno del Estado de México. Retrieved from http://coespo.edomex.gob.mx/sites/coespo.edomex.gob.mx/files/files/PPEM_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M. S. (2017). Animal welfare and efficient farming: Is conflict inevitable? Animal Production Science, 57(2), 201–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pasquale, J., Nannoni, E., Adinolfi, F., Del Duca, I., Capitanio, F., Sardi, L., … Martelli, G. (2016). A case-study on profiling Italian consumers of animal-friendly foods. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15(2), 294–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, S., Bear, C., & Walker, G. (2008). The sceptical consumer? Exploring views about food assurance. Food Policy, 33(6), 624–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA (2007). Attitudes of EU citizens towards Animal Welfare. Special Eurobarometer 270/ Wave 66.1 – TNS Opinion & Social. European Commission, 82.
   Google Scholar
• Faucitano, L., Martelli, G., Nannoni, E., & Widowski, T. (2017). Fundamentals of animal welfare in meat animals and consumer attitudes to animal welfare. In P. P. Purslow (Ed.), New aspects of meat quality: From genes to ethics (pp. 537–568). Sawston, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, D., Oytam, Y., & Hughes, J. (2017). Sensory perceptions and new consumer attitudes to meat. In P. P. Purslow (Ed.), New aspects of meat quality: From genes to ethics (pp. 537–568). Sawston, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, C. B., & Huertas, S. M. (2016). Main animal welfare problems in ruminant livestockduring preslaughter operations: A South American view. Animal, 10(2), 357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasca, J, & Torres, F. (2014). El control corporativo de la distribución de alimentos en méxico. Revista Problemas Del Desarrollo, 176(1), 133–155.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Corona, C., Escalona-Buendía, H. B., García, M., Chollet, S., & Valentin, D. (2016). Craft vs. industrial: Habits, attitudes and motivations towards beer consumption in Mexico. Appetite, 96, 358–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, R., Mehta, R., & Kardes, F. R. (2000). The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(3), 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grolleau, G., & Caswell, J. A. (2006). Interaction between food attributes in markets: The case of environmental labelling. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 31(3), 471–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, G. C., & Makatouni, A. (2002). Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British of Food Journal, 104(3/4/5), 287–299.
   Google Scholar
• INEGI. (2011). Censo de población y vivienda 2010. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Retrieved from www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/consulta_resultados/iter2010.aspx?c=27329&s=est.
   Google Scholar
• Javalgi, R. R. G., & Grossman, D. A. (2016). Aspirations and entrepreneurial motivations of middle-class consumers in emerging markets: The case of India. International Business Review, 25(2), 657–667.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (2014). Petition: To amend labeling regulations under the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products Inspection Act to require third-party certification for the approval of animal welfare and environmental stewardship claims. Retrieved from https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/5bdab0ca-8072-480b-9bd9-c9bc04b56531/Petition-AWI-Labeling-0514.pdf?MOD=AJPERES.
   Google Scholar
• Ladhari, R., & Tchetgna, N. M. (2015). The influence of personal values on Fair Trade consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 469–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. A., & Murray, D. L. (2013). Ethical consumption, values convergence/divergence and community development. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(2), 351–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazas, B., Fernández-Manzanal, M. R., Zarza, F. J., & María, G. A. (2013). Development and validation of a scale to assess students’ attitude towards animal welfare. International Journal of Science Education, 35(11), 1775–1799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, K. (2016). Celebrity endorsements: Influence of a product-endorser match on Millennials attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing Consumer Services, 32, 39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda-de la Lama, G. C., Estévez-Moreno, L. X., Sepúlveda, W. S., Estrada-Chavero, M. C., Rayas-Amor, A. A., Villarroel, M., & María, G. A. (2017). Mexican consumers’ perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare and willingness to pay for welfare friendly meat products. Meat Science, 125, 106–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda-de la Lama, G. C., Leyva, I. G., Barreras-Serrano, A., Pérez-Linares, C., Sánchez-López, E., María, G. A., & Figueroa-Saavedra, F. (2012). Assessment of cattle welfare at a commercial slaughter plant in the northwest of Mexico. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44(3), 497–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda-de la Lama, G. C., Sepúlveda, W. S., Villarroel, M., & María, G. A. (2011). Livestock vehicle accidents in Spain: Causes, consequences, and effects on animal welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 14(2), 109–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda-de la Lama, G. C., Sepúlveda, W. S., Villarroel, M., & María, G. A. (2013). Attitudes of meat retailers to animal welfare in Spain. Meat Science, 95(3), 569–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, M., & Zomer, S. (2017). Dutch consumers’ willingness to pay for broiler welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 20(2), 137–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold, K. B., & Scott, D. M. (2017). Driving over the life course: The automobility of Canada’s millennial, generation X, baby boomer and greatest generations. Travel Behaviour and Society, 6, 57–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardío, V., Martínez, D., Flores, A., Romero, D., Suárez, V., López, K., & Uscanga, R. (2012). Human health risk of dietary intake of organochlorine pesticide residues in bovine meat and tissues from Veracruz, Mexico. Food Chemistry, 135, 1873–1893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomarici, E., & Vecchio, R. (2014). Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: An exploratory study on Italian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 537–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, B. M. (2014). Nutrition, agriculture and the global food system in low and middle- income countries. Food Policy, 47, 91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, J. A., Franks, B., Weary, D. M., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2016). Awareness of ag-gag laws erodes trust in farmers and increases support for animal welfare regulations. Food Policy, 61, 121–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, P., Hötzel, M. J., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. (2017). American citizens’ views of an ideal pig farm. Animals, 7(8), 64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, M. T., De Boer, I. J. M., Gremmen, B., & Lokhorst, C. (2013). Livestock farming with care: Towards sustainable production of animal-source food. NJAS–Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 66, 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepúlveda, W., Maza, M. T., & Mantecón, A. R. (2008). Factors that affect and motivate the purchase of quality-labelled beef in Spain. Meat Science, 80(4), 1282–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signori, S., & Forno, F. (2016). Closing the attitude-behaviour gap: The case of solidarity purchase groups. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 475–481.
   Google Scholar
• Teisl, M. F., Rubin, J., & Noblet, C. L. (2008). Non-dirty dancing? Interactions between eco-labels and consumers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 140–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thach, E. C., & Olsen, J. E. (2006). Market segment analysis to target young adult wine drinkers. Agribusiness, 22(3), 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J., De Barcellos, M. D., Perin, M. G., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Consumer buying motives and attitudes towards organic food in two emerging markets: China and Brazil. International Marketing Review, 32(3/4), 389–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, L., Stott, A. W., Revoredo-Giha, C., & Kupiec-Teahan, B. (2012). Consumers and animal welfare. A comparison between European Union countries. Appetite, 58(2), 597–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E., Miranda-de la Lama, G. C., Teixeira, D. L., Enríquez-Hidalgo, D., Tadich, T., & Lensink, J. (2017). Farm Animal Welfare Influences on Markets and Consumer Attitudes in Latin America: The Cases of Mexico, Chile and Brazil. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30(5), 697–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhonacker, F., & Verbeke, W. (2009). Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not. Poultry Science, 88(12), 2702–2711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhonacker, F., & Verbeke, W. (2014). Public and consumer policies for higher welfare food products: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27(1), 153–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, R., & Annunziata, A. (2012). Italian consumer awareness of layer hens’ welfare standards: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(6), 647–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, R., & Annunziata, A. (2015). Willingness-to-pay for sustainability-labelled chocolate: An experimental auction approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velarde, A, & Dalmau, A. (2012). Animal welfare assessment at slaughter in europe: moving from inputs to outputs. Meat Science, 92(3), 244-251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verain, M. C., Sijtsema, S. J., & Antonides, G. (2016). Consumer segmentation based on food-category attribute importance: The relation with healthiness and sustainability perceptions. Food Quality and Preference, 48, 99–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W., & Viaene, J. (1999). Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference, 10(6), 437–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–Behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. E., & McCoy, A. W. (2016). Millennials and chocolate product ethics: Saying one thing and doing another. Food Quality and Preference, 49, 42–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhllima, E., Imami, D., & Canavari, M. (2015). Consumer perceptions of food safety risk: Evidence from a segmentation study in Albania. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(6), 1142–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar