Advances in Applied Zoo Animal Welfare Science

References

• Alba, A. C., Leighty, K. A., Pittman Courte, V. L., Grand, A. P., & Bettinger, T. L. (2017). A turtle cognition research demonstration enhances visitor engagement and keeper-animal relationships. Zoo Biology, 36, 243–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Animal Welfare Research Network (2017, October). The animal welfare research network homepage. Retrieved October 25, 2017, from https://awrn.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, M. C., Hughes, B. O., Mench, J. A., & Olsson, A. (Eds.). (2011). Animal welfare (2nd ed ed.). Oxford, UK: CABI International.
   Google Scholar
• Asa, C. (2016). Weighing the options for limiting surplus animals. Zoo Biology, 35, 183–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13, 367–383.
   Google Scholar
• Bashaw, M. J., Sicks, F., Palme, R., Schwarzenberger, F., Tordiffe, A. S., & Ganswindt, A. (2016). Non-invasive assessment of adrenocortical activity as a measure of stress in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis). BMC Veterinary Research, 12, 235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blache, D., Terlouw, C., & Maloney, S. (2011). Physiology. In M. Appleby, J. Mench, A. Olsson, & B. Hughes (Eds.), Animal welfare (2nd ed ed., pp. 155–182). Wallingford, England: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, R. C., Gillespie, G. R., Kerswell, K. J., Butler, K. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2015). Effect of partial covering of the visitor viewing area window on positioning and orientation of zoo orangutans: A preference test. Zoo Biology, 34, 223–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracke, M. B. M., Spruijt, B. M., & Metz, J. H. M. (1999). Overall animal welfare assessment reviewed. Part 1: Is it possible? NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 47, 279–291.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, D. M. (1991). Animal welfare: Concepts and measurements. Journal of Animal Science, 69, 4167–4175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom, D. M. (1996). Animal welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavic Section A Animal Science Supplement, 27, 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, D. M. (2011). A history of animal welfare science. Acta Biotheoretica, 59, 121–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N., & Cohen, S. (2011). The public face of zoos: Images of entertainment, education and conservation. Anthrozoös, 24, 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M., Webber, S., & Sherwen, S. (2015). Naturalism and ACI: Augmenting zoo enclosures with digital technology. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on the Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (p. 61).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F. E. (2011). Great ape cognition and captive care: Can cognitive challenges enhance well-being? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 135, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. E. (2017). Cognitive enrichment and welfare: Current approaches and future directions. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 4, 52–71.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F. E., Davies, S. L., Madigan, A. W., Warner, A. J., & Kuczaj, S. A. (2013). Cognitive enrichment for bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): Evaluation of a novel underwater maze device. Zoo Biology, 32, 608–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. E Smith, L. J. (2013). Effect of a Cognitive Challenge Device Containing Food and Non–Food Rewards on Chimpanzee Well–Being. American Journal of Primatology, 75 (8), 807–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, I. L., Rödel, H. G., Cellier, M., Vink, D., Michaud, I., Mercera, B., … Delfour, F. (2017). Schedule of human-controlled periods structures bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) behavior in their free-time. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 131, 214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cless, I. T., & Lukas, K. E. (2017). Variables affecting the manifestation of and intensity of pacing behavior: A preliminary case study in zoo‐housed polar bears. Zoo Biology, 36, 307–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clubb, R., & Mason, G. (2003). Animal welfare: Captivity effects on wide-ranging carnivores. Nature, 425, 473–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clubb, R., & Mason, G. (2007). Natural behavioural biology as a risk factor in carnivore welfare: How analysing species differences could help zoos improve enclosures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102, 303–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comizzoli, P. (2015). Biotechnologies for wildlife fertility preservation. Animal Frontiers, 46, 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M. S. (2004). Using behaviour to assess animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 13, S3–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M. S. (2017). Animal welfare with and without consciousness. Journal of Zoology, 301, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and society: An introduction to human-animal studies. New York, USA: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. L., Trotter, J., Jones, M., Brown, J. L., Steinmetz, H. W., & Walker, S. L. (2016). Investigating temporary acyclicity in a captive group of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus): Relationship between management, adrenal activity and social factors. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 225, 104–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flacke, G. L., Schwarzenberger, F., Penfold, L. M., Walker, S. L., Martin, G. B., Millar, R. P., & Paris, M. C. (2017). Characterizing the reproductive biology of the female pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) through non-invasive endocrine monitoring. Theriogenology, 102, 126–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, D. (1999). Animal ethics and animal welfare science: Bridging the two cultures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65, 171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, D. (2009). Animal behaviour, animal welfare and the scientific study of affect. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118, 108–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, G., Raghanti, M. A., Dennis, P. M., Kuhar, C. W., Willis, M. A., Schook, M. W., & Lukas, K. E. (2016). A comparison of nocturnal primate behavior in exhibits illuminated with red and blue light. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 184, 126–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandin, T. (Ed.). (2015). Improving animal welfare: A practical approach. Wallingford, UK: CAB International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Greco, B. J., Meehan, C. L., Heinsius, J. L., & Mench, J. A. (2017). Why pace? The influence of social, housing, management, life history, and demographic characteristics on locomotor stereotypy in zoo elephants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 194, 104–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsworth, P. H., & Boivin, X. (2011). Human contact. In M. C. Appleby & B. O. Hughes (Eds.), Animal welfare (pp. 246–262). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsworth, P. H., & Coleman, G. J. (Eds.). (2011). Human–livestock interactions: The stockperson and the productivity and welfare of intensively-farmed animals (2nd ed.). Wallingford, UK: CAB International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, L. M. (2017). Cognitive research in zoos. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16, 100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosey, G. (2005). How does the zoo environment affect the behaviour of captive primates? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 90, 107–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosey, G. (2008). A preliminary model of human–Animal relationships in the zoo. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 109, 105–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosey, G. (2013). Hediger revisited: How do animals see us? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 16, 338–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosey, G., & Melfi, V. (2014). Human-animal interactions, relationships and bonds: A review and analysis of the literature. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27, 117–142.
   Google Scholar
• Hosey, G., & Melfi, V. (2015). Are we ignoring neutral and negative human–Animal relationships in zoos? Zoo Biology, 34, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulbert, A. J., Hunt, K. A., & Rose, P. E. (2017). A multi-zoo investigation of nutrient provision for captive red-crested turacos. Zoo Biology, 36, 152–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. L. M., Delfour, F., & Carter, T. (2013). Anticipatory behavior in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): A preliminary study. Zoo Biology, 32, 436–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, B. L., Torres, E., Chesney, C., Moon, V. K., & Watters, J. V. (2017). Applying behavioral conditioning to identify anticipatory behaviors. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 20, 155–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, B. L., & Watters, J. V. (2017). Simple but temporally unpredictable puzzles are cognitive enrichment. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 4, 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Kreger, M. D., & Hutchins, M. (2010). Ethics of keeping mammals in zoos and aquariums. In D. G. Kleiman, K. V. Thompson, & C. Kirk Baer (Eds.), Wild mammals in captivity: Principles and techniques for zoo management (pp. 3–10). Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroshko, J., Clubb, R., Harper, L., Mellor, E., Moehrenschlager, A., & Mason, G. (2016). Stereotypic route tracing in captive Carnivora is predicted by species-typical home range sizes and hunting styles. Animal Behaviour, 117, 197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbein, J., Siebert, K., & Nürnberg, G. (2009). On the use of an automated learning device by group-housed dwarf goats: Do goats seek cognitive challenges? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 120, 150–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maple, T. L., & Bloomsmith, M. A. (2017). Introduction: The science and practice of optimal animal welfare. Behavioural Processes. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.012
   Google Scholar
• Maple, T. L., & Perdue, B. M. (2013). Zoo animal welfare. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, G. J. (2010). Species differences in responses to captivity: Stress, welfare and the comparative method. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald Kinkaid, H. (2015). Species-level determinants of stereotypic behaviour, reproductive success, and lifespan in captive parrots (Psittaciformes). Unpublished doctorate thesis, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Meehan, C. L., & Mench, J. A. (2007). The challenge of challenge: Can problem solving opportunities enhance animal welfare? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102, 246–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melfi, V. A. (2009). There are big gaps in our knowledge, and thus approach, to zoo animal welfare: A case for evidence‐based zoo animal management. Zoo Biology, 28, 574–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor, D. J., & Beausoleil, N. J. (2015). Extending the ‘Five Domains’ model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Animal Welfare, 24, 241–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor, D. J., Hunt, S., & Gusset, M. (2015). Caring for wildlife: The world zoo and aquarium animal welfare strategy (pp. 87). Gland, Switzerland: WAZA Executive Office.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, S., Puppe, B., & Langbein, J. (2009). Cognitive enrichment in zoo and farm animals–Implications for animal behaviour and welfare. Berliner Und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 123, 446–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, N. W., Siwak-Tapp, C. T., Araujo, J., & Head, E. (2006). Neuroprotective effects of cognitive enrichment. Ageing Research Reviews, 5, 354–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. J., Pisacane, C. B., & Vicino, G. A. (2016). Relationship between behavioural diversity and faecal glucocorticoid metabolites: A case study with cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). Animal Welfare, 25, 325–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, D. W., Lackey, L. B., Streich, W. J., Fickel, J., Hatt, J. M., & Clauss, M. (2010). Mating system, feeding type and ex situ conservation effort determine life expectancy in captive ruminants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2076–2080.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, A., Malone, N., & Park, J. (2016). Caregiver/orangutan relationships at Auckland Zoo. Society and Animals, 24, 230–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penfold, L. M., Powell, D., Traylor‐Holzer, K., & Asa, C. S. (2014). “Use it or lose it”: Characterization, implications, and mitigation of female infertility in captive wildlife. Zoo Biology, 33, 20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdue, B. M., Clay, A. W., Gaalema, D. E., Maple, T. L., & Stoinski, T. S. (2012). Technology at the zoo: The influence of a touchscreen computer on Orangutans and zoo visitors. Zoo Biology, 31, 27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, O., Meiri, S., & Terkel, J. (2013). Socio-ecological factors correlate with levels of stereotypic behavior in zoo-housed primates. Behavioural Processes, 98, 85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princée, F. P. (2016). Exploring studbooks for wildlife management and conservation. London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, P. E., Nash, S. M., & Riley, L. M. (2017). To pace or not to pace? A review of what abnormal repetitive behavior tells us about zoo animal management. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 20, 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowden, L. J., & Rose, P. E. (2016). A global survey of Banteng (Bos javanicus) housing and husbandry. Zoo Biology, 35, 546–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russon, A. E., Smith, J. & Adams, L. (2016). Managing human-orangutan relationships in rehabilitation. Eds. Waller, M. Ethnoprimatology: Primate Conservation in the 21st Century. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, S. P., Harris, T., Traylor-Holzer, K., & Beck, K. G. (2014). Factors influencing breeding success, ovarian cyclicity, and cub survival in zoo-managed tigers (Panthera tigris). Animal Reproduction Science, 144, 38–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwen, S. L., Harvey, T. J., Magrath, M. J., Butler, K. M., Fanson, K. V., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2015). Effects of visual contact with zoo visitors on Black-capped Capuchin welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 167, 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwen, S. L., Magrath, M. J., Butler, K. M., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2015). Little penguins, Eudyptula minor, show increased avoidance, aggression and vigilance in response to zoo visitors. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 168, 71–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber, S. J., Barbey, N., Lenahan, K., & Silber, D. Z. (2013). Applying clinically proven human techniques for contraception and fertility to endangered species and zoo animals: A review. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 44, S111–S122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2014). Human-animal relationships in zoo-housed orangutans (P.abelii) and gorillas (G.g.gorilla): The effects of familiarity. American Journal of Primatology, 76, 942–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Špinka, M., & Wemelsfelder, F. (2011). Environmental challenge and animal agency. In M. C. Appleby & B. O. Hughes (Eds.), Animal welfare (pp. 27–43). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Spruijt, B. M., Van Den Bos, R., & Pijlman, F. T. (2001). A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: Anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 72, 145–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarou, L. R., Kuhar, C. W., Adcock, D., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Maple, T. L. (2004). Computer-assisted enrichment for zoo-housed orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Animal Welfare, 13, 445–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribe, A., & Booth, R. (2003). Assessing the role of zoos in wildlife conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8, 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcellos Da Silva, A., Virányi, Z., Range, F., Ades, C., Scheidegger, J. K., Möstl, E., & Kotrschal, K. (2016). Training reduces stress in human-socialised wolves to the same degree as in dogs. PloS One, 11, e0162389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, S. J., & Melfi, V. A. (2013). The implications of husbandry training on zoo animal response rates. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 147, 179–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, S. J., & Melfi, V. A. (2015). Keeper-animal interactions: differences between the behaviour of zoo animals affect stockmanship. PLoS One, 10, e0140237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watters, J. V. (2014). Searching for behavioral indicators of welfare in zoos: Uncovering anticipatory behavior. Zoo Biology, 33, 251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WAZA. (2016). Future of zoo and aquarium design. In World association of zoos and aquariums. Gland, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, S., Carter, M., Smith, W., & Vetere, F. (2017). Interactive technology and human–Animal encounters at the zoo. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 150–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wemelsfelder, F., & Lawrence, A. B. (2001). Qualitative assessment of animal behaviour as an on-farm welfare-monitoring tool. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section. A., 5, 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. G. (1981). What is and what ought to be done: An essay on ethics and epistemology. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, J., Micheletta, J., Powell, L. E., Bordier, C., & Waller, B. M. (2013). The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates. PLoS One, 8(11): e78308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitham, J. C., & Miller, L. J. (2016). Using technology to monitor and improve zoo animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 25, 395–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar