Why Are Octopuses Going to Be the ‘Poster Child’ for Invertebrate Welfare?

References

• Albert, C., Luque, G., & Courchamp, F. (2018). The twenty most charismatic species. PLoS ONE, 13(7), 0199149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C. (1987). Cephalopods at the Seattle Aquarium. International Zoo Yearbook, 26(1), 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Wood, J. B. W. (2001). Enrichment for giant Pacific octopuses: Happy as a clam? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 4(2), 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, P. L. R. (2011). Introduction: Laboratory invertebrates: Only spineless, or spineless and painless? ILAR Journal, 52(2), 121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, P. L. R., Darmaillacq, A.-S., Dennisons, N., Gleadall, I. G., Hawkins, P., Messenger, J. B., & Smith, J. A. (2013). The identification and management of pain, suffering and distress in cephalopods, including anaesthesia, analgesia and humane killing. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 447, 46–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG). (2014). Giant Pacific octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) care manual. Association of zoos and aquariums. Silver Springs, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, E. C., Mintzes, J. J., & Yen, C.-F. (2005). Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behavior towards charismatic megafauna: The case of dolphins. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(2), 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Batt, S. (2009). Human attitudes towards animals in relation to species similarity to humans: A multivariate approach. Bioscience Horizons, 2(2), 180–190.
   Google Scholar
• Boppre, M., & Vane-Wright, R. I. (2019). Welfare dilemmas created by keeping insects in captivity. In C. Carere & J. A. Mather (Eds.), The welfare of invertebrate animals (pp. 23–68). Cham, SU: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, G., Schlegel, J., Kauf, P., & Rupf, R. (2015). The importance of being colorful and able to fly: Interpretations and implications of children’s statements on selected insects and other invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2664–2687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom, D. M. (2006). The evolution of morality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100(1–2), 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler-Struben, H. M., Brophy, S. M., Johnson, N. A., & Crook, R. J. (2018). In vivo recording of neural and behavioral correlates of anesthesia induction, reversal, and euthanasia in cephalopod molluscs. Frontiers in Physiology, 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00109
   Google Scholar
• Carere, C., & Mather, J. A. (Eds). (2019). The welfare of invertebrate animals. Cham, SU: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, G. M., Tonkins, B. M., & Mather, J. A. (2019). Care and enrichment for captive cephalopods. In C. Carere & J. A. Mather (Eds.), The welfare of invertebrate animals (pp. 179–208). Cham, SU: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cousteau, J.-Y., & Diole, P. (1973). Octopus and squid: The soft intelligence. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Darmaillacq, A.-S., Dickel, L., & Mather, J. A. (2016). Cephalopod cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daw, A., Barord, G. J., & Hanlon, R. T. (2018). Post-mortem: The national resource center for Cephalopods (NRCC), 30 years of cephalopod aquaculture and research. Paper presented at the cephalopod international advisory conference, November 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Doubleday, Z. A., Prowse, T. A. A., Arkhipkin, A., Pierce, G. J., Semmens, J., Steer, M., & Gillanders, B. M. (2016). Global proliferation of cephalopods. Current Biology, 26(10), R387–R407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, J. W. (1995). Attitudes toward animals: Species ratings. Society and Animals, 3(2), 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Ducarme, F., Luque, G. M., & Courchamp, F. (2013, July). What are “charismatic species” for conservation biologists? Biosciences Master Reviews, 2013, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, T. J., Gallup, G. G., & Povinelli, D. J. (1993). Attribution of cognitive states to animals: Anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, D. B., Baars, B. J., & Seth, A. K. (2005). Identifying hallmarks of consciousness in non-mammalian species. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(1), 169–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, R. W. (2011). Pain and suffering in invertebrates? ILAR Journal, 52(2), 175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorito, G., Affuso, A., Basil, J., Cole, A., de Giorlamo, P., D’Angelo, L., & Andrews, P. L. R. (2015). Guidelines for the care and welfare of cephalopods in research—a consensus based on an initiative by CephRes, FELASA and the boyd group. Laboratory Animals, 49, 1–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2018). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Rome, IT: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido, C., & Nanetti, A. (2019). Welfare of managed honey bees. In C. Carere & J. A. Mather (Eds.), The welfare of invertebrate animals (pp. 69–104). Cham, SU: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey Smith, P. (2016). Other minds: The octopus, the sea, and the deep origins of consciousness. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G. (2009). Establishing a three Rs programme at the Canadian council on animal care. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 37(2 suppl), 63–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanlon, R., Vecchione, M., & Alcock, L. (2018). Octopus, squid and cuttlefish: A visual scientific guide to the ocean’s most advanced invertebrates. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, R. T., & Messenger, J. B. (1996). Cephalopod behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, R. T., & Messenger, J. B. (2018). Cephalopod behavior (2nd ed.). New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, K. H., Angeletti, D., Nascetti, G., & Carere, C. (2013). Invertebrate welfare: An overlooked issue. Annali Instituto Superiore di Sanità, 49, 9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffard, C. (2007). Ethogram of Abdopus aculeatus (d’Orbigny, 1834) (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae): Can behavioural characters inform octopodid taxonomy and systematics? Journal of Molluscan Studies, 73(2), 185–193.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1993). Values and perceptions of invertebrates. Conservation Biology, 7(4), 845–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B. J., & Marino, L. (2019). Octopus minds must lead to octopus ethics. Animal Sentience, 2019, 263.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, T. S., Haimovici, M., Molina, W., & Warnke, K. (2008). Morphological and genetic descriptions of Octopus insularis, a new cryptic species in the Octopus vulgaris complex (Cephalopods, Octopodidae) from the tropical southwestern Atlantic. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 74(1), 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Low, P., Edelman, D., & Koch, C. (2012). Consciousness in human and non-human animals. In Francis Crick memorial conference, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, G., DeSoto, F., Ponte, G., & Fiorito, G. (2017). Behavioral analysis of learning and memory. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (pp. 441–462). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, J. A. (1991a). Foraging, feeding and prey remains in middens of juvenile Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Journal of Zoology, London, 224(1), 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, J. A. (1991b). Navigation by spatial memory and use of visual landmarks in octopuses. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 168(4), 491–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, J. A. (2001). Animal suffering: An invertebrate perspective. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 4(2), 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, J. A. (2008). Cephalopod consciousness: Behavioral evidence. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, J. A. (2011). Philosophical background of attitudes toward and treatment of invertebrates. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal, 52(2), 185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, J. A. (2019). Ethics and care for animals, not just mammals. Animals, 9(12), 1018-1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, J. A., & Alupay, J. (2016). An ethogram for benthic octopuses (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130(2), 109–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, J. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Personalities of octopuses (Octopus rubescens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107(3), 336–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, J. A., Anderson, R. C., & Wood, J. B. (2010). Octopus: The ocean’s intelligent invertebrate. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, D. J., & Beausoleil, N. J. (2015). Extending the ‘Five domains’ model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Animal Welfare, 24(3), 241–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhalevich, I., & Powell, R. (2020). Minds without spines: Evolutionarily inclusive animal ethics. Animal Sentience, 27(1), 329.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, S. (2015). The soul of an octopus. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Morelli, T. (2013). TONMO FAQ: the octopus news magazine online. Retrieved from https://www.tonmo.com/pages/tonmofaq/
   Google Scholar
• Ponte, G., Andrews, P., Galligioni, V., Pereira, J., & Fiorito, G. (2019). Cephalopod welfare, biological and regulatory aspects: An EU experience. In C. Carere & J. A. Mather (Eds.), The welfare of invertebrate animals (pp. 209–228). Cham, SU: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roberge, J. M. (2014). Using data from online social networks in conservation science: Which species engage people the most on Twitter? Biodiversity and Conservation, 23(3), 715–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, K., McConney, A., & Mansfield, K. (2014). The role of zoos in modern society—a comparison of zoos’ reported priorities and what visitors believe they should be. Anthrozoos, 27(4), 529–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanes, G. J. (1885). Mental evolution in animals. London, UK: Kegan, Paul & Trench.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffers, B. R., Joppa, L. N., Pimm, S. L., & Laurance, W. F. (2012). What we know and don’t know about Earth’s missing biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(9), 501–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergio, F., Carp, T., Brown, D., Clucas, B., Hunter, J., Ketchum, J., & Hiraldo, F. (2008). Top predators as conservation tools: Ecological rationale, assumptions, and efficacy. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Andrews, P. L. R., Hawkins, P., Louhimes, S., Ponte, G., & Dickel, L. (2013). Cephalopod research and EU directive 2010/63/EU: Requirements, impacts and ethical review. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 447, 31–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toussaint, R. K., Scheel, D., Sage, D. K., & Talbot, S. L. (2012). Molecular and mitochondrial markers reveal evidence for genetically segregated cryptic speciation in giant Pacific octopuses from Prince William Sound, Alaska. Conservation Genetics, 13(6), 1483–1497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. (2013). Diving with octopuses. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar