1,151
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Challenges in combining Indigenous and scientific knowledge in the Arctic

ORCID Icon
Pages 62-74 | Received 04 Jan 2022, Accepted 02 May 2023, Published online: 12 Jul 2023

References

  • Abu, R., Reed, M. G., & Jardine, R. T. (2020). Using two-eyed seeing to bridge Western science and Indigenous knowledge systems and understand long-term change in the Saskatchewan River Delta, Canada. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 36(5), 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2018.1558050
  • Alfred, T. (1999). Peace, power righteousness: An Indigenous manifesto. Oxford University Press.
  • Altman, J., & Whitehead, P. J. (2003). Caring for country and sustainable Indigenous development: Opportunities, constraints and innovation. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research.
  • ARCUS. (2022). Understanding and overcoming collaborative Arctic research challenges. ARCUS Interdisciplinary Research Committee Report. Retrieved July 8, 2022, from https://www.arcus.org/search/content/ARCUS%20Interdisciplinary%20Research%20Committee%20Report
  • Athayde, S., Silva-Lugo, J., Schmink, M., Kaiabi, A., & Heckenberger, M. (2017). Reconnecting art and science for sustainability: Learning from Indigenous knowledge through participatory action-research in the Amazon. Ecology and Society, 22(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09323-220236
  • Austin, B. J., Robinson, C. J., Mathews, D., Oades, D., Wiggin, A., Dobbs, R. J., Lincoln, G., & Garnett, S. T. (2019). An indigenous-led approach for regional knowledge partnerships in the Kimberley region of Australia. Human Ecology, 47(4), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00085-9
  • Beans, W. (1997). Learning put into cultural perspective. In R. Barnhardt, & A. O. Kawagley (Eds.), Sharing our pathways. 2(2). Alaska Native Knowledge Network, Center for Cross-Cultural Studies. Retrieved July 6, 2023, from http://ankn.uaf.edu/sop/SOPv2i2.html#teaching
  • Bohensky, E. L., & Maru, Y. (2011). Indigenous knowledge, science, and resilience: What have we learned from a decade of international literature on “integration”? Ecology and Society, 16(4), 6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04342-160406
  • Brook, R. K., & McLachlan, S. M. (2005). On using expert-based science to “test” local ecological knowledge. Ecology and Society, 10(2), r3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01478-1002r03
  • Brunet, N. D., Hickey, G. M., & Humphries, M. M. (2014). The evolution of local participation and the mode of knowledge production in Arctic research. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06641-190269
  • Castleden, H., Morgan, V. S., & Lamb, C. (2012). “I spent the first year drinking tea”: Exploring Canadian university researchers’ perspectives on community-based participatory research involving Indigenous peoples. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 56(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00432.x
  • Chapman, J. M., & Schott, S. (2020). Knowledge coevolution: Generating new understanding through bridging and strengthening distinct knowledge systems and empowering local knowledge holders. Sustainability Science, 15(3), 931–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00781-2
  • Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. University of Botswana.
  • Christie, M. (2006). Transdisciplinary research and aboriginal knowledge. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 35(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100004191
  • Cochran, A. L., Marshall, C. A., Garcia-Downing, C., Kendall, E., Cook, D., McCubbin, L., & Gover, R. M. S. (2008). Indigenous ways of knowing: Implications for participatory research and community. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.093641
  • Cooke, S. J., Nguyen, V. M., Chapman, J. M., Reid, A. J., Landsman, A. J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Schott, S., Mandrak, N. E., & Semeniuk, C. A. D. (2020). Knowledge co-production: A pathway to effective fisheries management, conservation, and governance. Fisheries, 46(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10512
  • Corntassel, J. (2008). Toward sustainable self-determination: Rethinking the contemporary Indigenous-rights discourse. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 33(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540803300106
  • Country, B., Wright, S., Suchet-Pearson, S., Lloyd, K., Burarrwanga, L., Ganambarr, R., Ganambarr-Stubbs, M., Ganambarr, B., Maymuru, D., & Sweeney, J. (2016). Co-becoming Bawaka: Towards a relational understanding of place/space. Progress in Human Geography, 40(4), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515589437
  • Dennison, J. (2012). Colonial entanglement: Constituting a twenty-first-century Osage nation. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Doering, N., Dudeck, S., Elverum, S., Fisher, C., Henriksen, J. E., Herrmann, T. M., Kramvig, B., Laptander, R., Milton, J., & Omma, E. M. (2022). Improving the relationships between indigenous rights holders and researchers in the Arctic: An invitation for change in funding and collaboration. Environmental Research Letters, 17(6), 065014–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac72b5
  • Du Toit, J. T., Walker, B. H., & Campbell, B. M. (2004). Conserving tropical nature: Current challenges for ecologists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19(1), 12–17.
  • Ellam Yua, Raymond-Yakoubian, J., Daniel, R. A., & Behe, C. (2022). A framework for co-production of knowledge in the context of Arctic research. Ecology and Society, 27(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12960-270134
  • Ellis, C. (1995). Emotional and ethical quagmires in returning to the field. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(1), 68–98.
  • Ermine, W. (2007). The ethical space of engagement. Indigenous Law Journal, 6, 193–203.
  • Fienup-Riordan, A. (2018). Yuuyaraq. The yup'ik way of being. Alaska Native Language Center.
  • Gone, J. P. (in press). Researching with American Indian and Alaska Native communities: Pursuing partnerships for psychological inquiry in service to indigenous futurity. In H. Cooper (Ed.-in-Chief), M. Coutanche, L. M. McMullen, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 1–35). American Psychological Association.
  • Griffiths, S., & Kinnane, S. (2010). Kimberley aboriginal caring for country plan - healthy country, healthy people. Kimberley Language Resource Centre.
  • Haig-Brown, C. (2003). Creating spaces: Testimonio, impossible knowledge, and academe. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000086763
  • Hill, R., Grant, C., George, M., Robinson, C. J., Jackson, S., & Abel, N. (2012). A typology of Indigenous engagement in Australian environmental management: Implications for knowledge integration and social-ecological system sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04587-170123
  • Johnson, J. T., Howitt, R., Cajete, G., Berkes, F., Louis, R. P., & Kliskey, A. (2016). Weaving indigenous and sustainability sciences to diversify our methods. Sustainability Science, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0349-x
  • Kawagley, A. O. (1997). Active reality research. In R. Barnhardt, & A. O. Kawagley (Eds.), Sharing our pathways. 2(3-5) (pp. 1–9). Alaska Native Knowledge Network, Center for Cross-Cultural Studies.
  • Merculieff, I., & Roderick, L. (2013). Stop talking. Indigenous ways of teaching and learning and difficult dialogues in higher education. University of Alaska Anchorage.
  • Miller, T. R., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, G., Kofinas, G., Chaplin, F. S., III, & Redman, C. L. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02671-130246
  • Moreno-Cely, A., Cuajera-Nahui, D., Escobar-Vasquez, C. G., Vanwing, T., & Tapia-Ponce, N. (2021). Breaking monologues in collaborative research: Bridging knowledge systems through a listening-based dialogue of wisdom approach. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00937-8
  • National Science Foundation Website. (n.d.). Principles for Conducting Research in the Arctic. https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/arctic/conduct.jsp#one. Last accessed April 26th, 2023.
  • Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2010). Does Germany need a (new) research ethics for the social sciences? In German Data Forum (Ed.), Building on progress. Expanding the research infrastructure for the social, economic, and behavioral sciences (pp. 673–686). Band 2. Opladen.
  • Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M., Stringer, L., Robinson, G., & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), 1766–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023
  • Reed, G., Brunet, N., & Natcher, D. (2020). Can indigenous community-based monitoring act as a tool for sustainable self-determination? The Extractive Industries and Society, 7, 1283–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.04.006
  • Schuttenberg, H. Z., & Guth, H. K. (2015). Seeking our shared wisdom: A framework for understanding knowledge coproduction and coproductive capacities. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07038-200115
  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. University of Otago Press and Zed Books.
  • Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P., & Spierenburg, M. (2014). Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence base approach. Ambio, 43(5), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3
  • Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., Spierenburg, M., Danielsen, F., & Folke, C. (2017). Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005
  • Whyte, K. P., Brewer, J. P., & Johnson, J. T. (2015). Weaving indigenous science, protocols and sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 11(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0296-6
  • Zurba, M., Petriello, M. A., Madge, C., McCarney, P., Bishop, B., McBeth, S., Denniston, M., Bodwitch, H., & Bailey, M. (2022). Learning from knowledge co-production research and practice in the twenty-first century: Global lessons and what they mean for collaborative research in Nunatsiavut. Sustainability Science, 17(2), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00996-x