A C OMPARISON OF B IPHASIC AND M ONOPHASIC S HOCKS FOR E XTERNAL D EFIBRILLATION

References

• Eisenberg MS, Horwood BT, Cummins RO, Reynolds-Haertle R, Hearne TR. Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19: 179–86.
   Google Scholar
• White RD, Asplin BR, Bugliosi TF, Hankins DG. High discharge survival rate after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation with rapid defibrillation by police and paramedics. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:480–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman PD, Vetter JIM, Souza JL Wetherbee JN, Troup PJ. Comparison of monophasic with single and dual capacitor biphasic waveforms for nonthoracotomy canine internal defib-rillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:242–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh KM, Tang ASL, Rollins DL, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Comparison of the internal defibrillation thresholds for monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic wave-forms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:1343–9.
   Google Scholar
• Winkle RA, Mead RH, Ruder MA, et al. Improved low energy defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncat-ed exponential waveform. Am Heart J. 1989;117:122–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppel R, Siebels J, Schneider MA, Kuck KH. The single endo-cardial lead configuration for ICD implantation: biphasic versus monophasic waveform [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:128A.
   Google Scholar
• Swerdlow CD, Peter CT, Cass R1\4, et al. Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability. Circulation. 1997;95:1497–504.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins SL. The Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing, 1997, pp 46–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins RO, Hazinski MF, Kerber RE, et al. Low-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation: evidenced-based review applied to emergency cardiovascular care guidelines. Circulation. 1998;97:1654–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bardy GH, Marchlinski FE, Sharma AD, et al. Multicenter com-parison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibril-lation. Circulation. 1996;94:2507–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman FVV, El-Abbady TZ, Walcott GP, Johnson JL, Jones JL, Ideker RE. Dysfunction following transthoracic defibrillation shocks in dogs [abstract]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20:1128.
   Google Scholar
• Negovsky VA, Smerdov AA, Tabak VY, Venin IV, Bogushevich MS. Criteria of efficiency and safety of the defibrillating impulse. Resuscitation. 1980;8:53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy RK, Gleva, ML Gliner BE, et al. Biphasic transthoracic defibrillation causes fewer ECG ST-segment changes after shock. Ann Emerg Med. 199730: 127–34.
   Google Scholar
• Walcott GP, Walker RG, Cates AW, Krassowska W, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Choosing the optimal monophasic and biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6:737–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber RE, Becker LB, Bourland JD, et al. Automatic external defibrillators for public access defibrillation: recommendations for specifying and reporting arrhythmia analysis algorithm per-formance, incorporating new waveforms, and enhancing safety. Circulation. 1997;95:1677–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardiac Defibrillators: ANSI/AAMI DF2-1996. Arlington, VA: AA1VII, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwelder WC. "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical tri-als. Controlled Clin Trials. 19823: 345–53.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1981, p 42.
   Google Scholar
• Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984, p 401.
   Google Scholar
• El-Abbady TZ, Walcott GP, Chapman FVV, Johnson JL, Ideker RE. The effect of transthoracic impedance on the efficacy of monophasic Edmark and biphasic truncated exponential defib-rillation shocks [abstract]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20:1128.
   Google Scholar
• Walcott GP, El-Abbady TZ, Chapman FC, et al. Comparison of monophasic and truncated exponential biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation following short and long duration of ven-tricular fibrillation [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 199831:403A.
   Google Scholar
• Scheatzle MD, Menegazzi II. Allen TL, Durham SB. Evaluation of biphasic transthoracic defibrillation in an animal model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:880–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker RG, O'Grady SG, Purdy SA, Chapman FVV. Initial expe-rience with a full energy biphasic waveform for termination of ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [abstract]. Resuscitation. 2000;45(1):550.
   Google Scholar
• Koster RW, Adams R, Chapman FVV. Biphasic truncated expo-nential shocks provide a high rate of success for external car-dioversion of atrial fibrillation [abstract]. Resuscitation. 2000;45(1):552.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal S, Ayati S, Stein KM, et al. Comparison of a novel recti-linear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monopha-sic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 199934: 1595–601.
   Google Scholar
• Bourland JD, Tacker WA, Geddes LA, Chafee V. Strength-dura-tion curves for trapezoidal waveforms of various tilts for trans-chest defibrillation in animals. Med Instrum. 1978;12:38–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourland JD, Tacker WA, Geddes LA. Comparative efficacy of damped sine wave and square wave current for transchest ven-tricular defibrillation in animals. Med Instrum. 1978;12:42–5.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider T, Martens P, Paschen H, et al. Randomized compar-ison of 150J biphasic and 200-360 J monophasic AEDs in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims [abstract]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999;22:A146.
   Google Scholar
• Walker RG, Taylor JIM, Schmitt PW, et al. Comparison of an experimental 150J biphasic truncated exponential defibrillation waveform to standard 200 J monophasic defibrillation wave-forms for external defibrillation [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 200035:400A.
   Google Scholar
• Behr JC, Hartley LL, York DK, Brown DD, Kerber RE. Truncated exponential versus damped sinusoidal waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:1242–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gliner BE, Jorgenson DB, Poole JE, et al. Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a low-energy impedance compen-sating biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator. Biomed Instrumen Technol. 199832: 631 44.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson CM, Bailey A, Allen JD, Anderson J, Adgey AA. Cardiac injury with damped sine and trapezoidal defibrillator wave-forms. Eur Heart J. 1989;10:628–36.
   Google Scholar
• Xie J, Weil MH, Sun S, et al. High-energy defibrillation increases the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Circulation. 1997;96:683–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb NR, Cuthbert D, Cawood P, Flapan AD, Fox KAA. Effect of DC shock on serum levels of total cratine kinase, MB-creatine kinase mass and troponin T. Resuscitation. 1998;36:193–9.
   Google Scholar
• Garre L, Alvarez A, Rubio M, et al. Use of cardiac troponin T rapid assay in the diagnosis of a myocardial injury secondary to electrical cardioversion. Clin Cardiol. 1997;20:619–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan II. Feld RD, Russell AA, et al. Cardiac troponin I levels are normal or minimally elevated after transthoracic cardioversion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 199730: 1052–6.
   Google Scholar
• Runsio M, Kallner A, Kallner G, Rosenqvist M, Bergfeldt L. Myocardial injury after electrical therapy for cardiac arrhyth-mias assessed by troponin-T release. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1241–5.
   Google Scholar
• Tacker WA. Defibrillation of the Heart. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, 1994, pp 288–91.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins SL, Alexander DC, Kuypers CJ, Brewster SA. The sub-cutaneous array: a new lead adjunct for the transvenous ICD to lower defibrillation thresholds. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994;17:1540–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dalzell GW, Cunningham SR, Anderson J, Adgey AA. Electrode pad size, transthoracic impedance and success of external ven-tricular defibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:741–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang P, Brinker JA, Bulkley BH, Jugdutt BI, Varghese PJ. Ischemic ventricular fibrillation: the importance of being spon-taneous. Am J Cardiol. 1981;48:455–9.
   Google Scholar
• Killingsworth CR, Walcott GP, Churchwell SR, Smith WM. Comparison of biphasic waveform transthoracic defibrillation thresholds for electrically induced and spontaneous ventricular fibrillation in a dog model of acute ischemia and reperfusion [abstract]. Circulation. 1998;98:1–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlon VVL Eisenberg SR, Lehr JL. Effects of paddle placement and size on defibrillation current distribution: a three-dimen-sional finite element model. IEEE Trans BME. 1993;40:246–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar