270
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EDUCATION AND PRACTICE

M AXIMIZING C OMFORT AND M INIMIZING I SCHEMIA : A C OMPARISON OF F OUR M ETHODS OF S PINAL I MMOBILIZATION

, &
Pages 250-252 | Published online: 02 Jul 2009

References

  • Spine Management Skills. In: McSwain NE (ed). Prehospital Trauma Life Support (ed 2). Akron, OH: Educational Direction, Inc., 1990, pp 225–56.
  • O'Keefe MF, Limmer D, Grant HD, et al (eds). Emergency Care (ed. 8). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Brady/Prentice Hall, 1998, pp 610–2.
  • Domeier R1\4, for the National Association of EMS Physicians Standards and Clinical Practice Committee. Indications for pre-hospital spinal immobilization [position paper]. Prehosp Emerg Care. 19993: 251–2.
  • Podolski S, Baraff LJ, Simon RR, et al. Efficacy of cervical spine immobilization methods. J Trauma. 1983;23:461–5.
  • Farrington JD. Extrication of victims-surgical principles. J Trauma. 1968;8:493–512.
  • Barney RN, Cordell VVII, Miller E. Pain associated with immo-bilization on rigid spine boards [abstract]. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;17:918.
  • Schriger D, Larmon B, LeGassick T, Blinman T. Spinal immobi-lization on a flat backboard: does it result in neutral position of the cervical spine? Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:878-81.
  • Chan D, Goldberg R, Tascone A, et al. The effect of spinal immo-bilization on healthy volunteers. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23:–48–51.
  • Walton R, DeSalvo if, Ernst AA, Shahane A. Padded vs unpadded spine board for cervical spine immobilization. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2:725–8.
  • Cordell VVII, Hollingsworth JC, Olinger ML, Stroman JS, Nelson DR. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:31–6.
  • Lerner EB, Billittier AL Moscati RM. The effects of neutral posi-tioning with and without padding on spinal immobilization of healthy subjects. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998;2:112–6.
  • Bachulis BL, Long VVB, Hynes GD, et al. Clinical indications for cervical spine radiographs in the traumatized patient. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;153:473–7.
  • Ringenberg BJ, Fischer AK, Urdaneta LF, et al. Rational order-ing of cervical spine radiographs following trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17:792–6.
  • Krouskop T, Nobel PC, Garber SL, Spencer WA. The effective-ness of preventative management in reducing the occurrence of pressure sores. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1983;20:74–83.
  • Johnson DR, Hauswald M, Stodcoff C. Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:369–2.
  • Carr DB, Goudas LC. Acute pain. Lancet. 1999353: 2051–8.
  • Guyton AC (ed). Sensory receptors; neuronal circuits for pro-cessing information: In: Medical Physiology (ed 8). Philadel-phia: W. B. Saunders, 1996, pp 583–4.
  • Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2:1127–31.
  • Rosen M. The measurement of pain. In: Harcus AW, Smith RB, Whittle BA (eds). Pain-New Perspectives in Measurement and Management. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1977, pp 13–26.
  • Huskisson EC. Visual analogue scales. In: Melzadc R (ed). Pain Measurement and Assessment. New York: Raven Press, 1983, pp 33–7.
  • Revill SL Robinson JO, Rosen M, et al. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 197631: 1191–8.
  • Menegazzi J. Measuring pain at baseline and over time. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:433–5.
  • Babbie ER. Survey Research Methods (ed 1). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, pp 131–6.
  • Kirk RE. Multiple comparison tests. In: Experimental Design, (ed 2). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1982, pp 90–126.
  • Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonaci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27: 485–9.
  • Kelly A-M. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:1086–90.
  • O'Connor KC, Kirshblum SC. Pressure ulcers. In: DeLisa JA, Gans BM (eds). Rehabilitation Medicine Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998, pp 1057–73.
  • Panel for Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Adults, Prediction and Prevention. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 3. AHCPR publication No. 92–0047. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1992.
  • De Lorenzo RA. A review of spinal immobilization techniques. J Emerg Med. 1996;14:603–3.
  • Hauswald M, Ong G, Tandberg D, Omar Z. Out-of-hospital spinal immobilization: its effect on neurologic injury. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:214–9.
  • Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Frankel HL. Mortality, morbidi-ty, and psychosocial outcomes of persons spinal cord injured more than 10 years ago. Paraplegia. 1992;30: 617–30.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.