References
- Neely KW, Drake MER, Moorhead JC, Schmidt TA, Skeen DT, Wilson EA. Multiple options and unique pathways. Ann Emerg Med. 199730: 797–9.
- Koenig KL. Unscheduled access to health care: reengineering the 911 sys-tem [commentary]. Acad Emerg Med. 19963: 989–91.
- A Task Force Report on the Future of Emergency Medical Services. Oakland, CA: Alameda County Health Care Services Agency, 1994.
- Manager's Report from the City Manager of San Diego, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) System Design Project. Report No. 96–169, Aug 28,1996.
- Neely KW. Demand management: the new view of EMS? Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997;1:114-8.
- Neely KW. Multiple option decisions points: an emerging view of EMS. J Emerg Med Serv. 1997;22(3):56–65.
- Jaslow D, Barbera JA, Johnson E, Moore W. EMS-initiated refusal and alternative methods of transport. Prehosp EmergCare. 1998;2:18–22.
- Brady VVJ, Hennes H, Wolf A, Hall KN,Davis M. Patterns of basic life support ambulance use in an urban pediatric population. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14: 250–3.
- Webb SB, Christoforo J. The use and misuse of ambulance services by the population using the emergency de-partment at the Hospital of St. Raphael. Conn Med.197438: 195–7.
- Billittier AJ IV, Moscati R, Janicke D, et al. A multisite survey of factors con-tributing to medically unnecessary ambulance transports. Acad Emerg Med. 19963: 1046–52.
- Selden BS, Schnitzer PG, Nolan FX, Veronesi if. The "no-patient " run: 2,698 patients evaluated but not transported by paramedics. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1991;6:135–42.
- Morris DL, Cross AB. Is the emergency ambulance service abused? Br Med J. 1980;12:121–3.
- Pennycook AG, Makower R1\4, Mor-rison WG. Use of the emergency ambu-lance service to an inner city accident and emergency department-a compar-ison of general practitioner and '999' calls. R Soc Med. 1991;84: 726–7.
- O'Leary C, Bury G, McCabe M, et al. Ambulance-user analysis in an accident andemergency department. Jr Med J.1987;80:422–6.
- Rademaker AW, Powell DG, Read JH. Inappropriate use and unmet need in paramedic and non-paramedic ambu-lance systems. Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16(5):67–70.
- Hossfeld G, Ryan M. HMOs and utiliza-tion of emergency medical services: a metropolitan survey. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18:374–7.
- Neely KW, Norton RL. A survey of health maintenance organization instructions to members concerning ED and 911 use. Ann Emerg Med. 199934: 19–24.
- Young GP, Lowe RA. Adverse out-comes of managed care gatekeeping. Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4:1129–36.
- Kerr HD. Prehospital emergency ser-vices and health maintenance organiza-tions. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15:727–9.
- Koenig KL, Salvucci AA, Zachariah BS, O'Connor RE. EMS systems and man-aged care integration [NAEMSP posi-tion paper]. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998;2:67–9.
- Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Emergency Medical Services Agenda for the Future Implementation Guide. Washington, DC: NHTSA, May 1998.
- Kissick WL. Medicine's Dilemmas: Infinite Needs versus Finite Resources. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.
- Neely KW. Rethinking gatekeeping: a closer look at its application to emer-gency medical services. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:563–4.
- Franco SM, Mitchell CK, Buzon RM. Primary care physician access and gate-keeping: a key to reducing emergency department use. Clin Pediatr. 1997;Feb:63–8.
- Gadomski AM, Perkis V, Horton L, Cross S, Stanton B. Diverting managed care patients from pediatric emergency department use. Pediatrics. 1995;95: 170–8.
- Warren BH, Bell PS, Isikoff S, Hale PL. Cost containment and quality of life: an experiment in compassion for physi-cians. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:741–4.
- Glotzer D, Sager A, Socolar D, Weitzman M. Prior approval in the pediatric emergency room. Pediatrics. 1991;88:674–80.