T HE C HALLENGES OF R ESPONDING TO “H IGH-TECH ” C ARDIAC I MPLANT P ATIENTS IN C RISIS

References

• History of Medicine Timeline. Available from: http://www. medhelpnet.com/medhistquicklist.html. Accessed Jun 5, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Topol TJ. Coronary-artery stents-gauging, gorging, and goug-ing. N Engl J Med. 1998539: 1702–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wohl V. Boston Scientific Corporation. Merrill Lynch & Company Health-Medical Technology Report. Oct 6, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Guidant Corporation. Multi-link Ultra Coronary Stent System Instructions for Use. Available from: http://www.guidant. com/products/ultra_ifu.shtml. Accessed Dec 14, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin HR. Mechanisms of forward flow during external chest compression. In: Paradis NA, Halperin HR, Nowak RM (eds). Cardiac Arrest: The Science and Practice of Resuscitation Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1996, pp 252–69.
   Google Scholar
• American Heart Association. American Heart Association Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2000;102(suppl I):122–159.
   Google Scholar
• Windecker S, Maier W, Eberli FR, Meier B, Hess OM. Mechanical compression of coronary artery stents: potential hazard for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 200051: 464–7.
   Google Scholar
• Vogtmarm T, Volmar J, Kronsbein H, Bonze' T. Deformation of a coronary stent by cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Z Kardiol. 1999;88:296–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield K, Schainfeld R, Pieczek A, Haley L, Isner JM. Restenosis of endovascular stents from stent compression. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:328–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies J, Senses S. Coronary angioplasty in Australia 1998. AII-IVV Catalogue Number CVD 14 (Cardiovascular Disease Series No. 15). Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and National Heart Foundation of Australia, 2001, pp 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang SO, Lee KH, Lee JW, et al. Influence of precordial com-pression on the heart during cardiopulmonary chest compres-sions in humans: do we compress the right spot? Circulation. 2001;104:11401.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin H, Berger R, Chandra N, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a hydraulic-pneumatic band. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(suppl):N203–N206.
   Google Scholar
• Westhoff J. The Cardiopump and pneumatic vest: what are the prospects for the development of a device designed to replace conventional CPR? Ketav. 1995;2(online journal available at http: / /lal.cs.byu.edu/ketav /issue_2.5 /cardio.html. Accessed Jun 5, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• United Network for Organ Sharing. Critical Data: The UNOS National Patient Waiting List. Available from: http://www. unos.org. Accessed Dec 17, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Special Programs, Division of Transplantation, United Network for Organ Sharing. 2000 Annual Report of the U.S. Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Transplant Data: 1990 –1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bramstedt KA. Left ventricular assist devices: an ethical analy-sis. Sci Eng Ethics. 19995: 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson LW, Kormos RL, Bourge RC, et al. Mechanical car-diac support 2000: current applications and future trial design. J Am Coll Cardiol. 200157: 340–70.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid C, Hammel D, Deng MC, et al. Ambulatory care of patients with left ventricular assist devices. Circulation. 1999;100(suppl II):11224–11228.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles C. Left ventricular assist devices in the community. Perfusion. 2000;15:373–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroney DA, Powers K. Outpatient use of left ventricular assist devices: nursing, technical, and educational considerations. Am J Crit Care. 1997;6:355–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catanese KA, Goldstein DJ, Williams DL, et al. Outpatient left ventricular assist device support: a destination rather than a bridge. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:646–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun BC, Catanese KA, Spanier TB, et al. 100 long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia Presbyterian interim experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:688–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers TJ, Dasse KA, Macris MP, Poirier VL, Cloy MJ, Frazier OH. Use of a left ventricular assist device in an outpatient set-ting. ASAIO J. 1994;40:M471–M475.
   Google Scholar
• Piccione W, Kao WG, Mattea A, Rodriguez ER, Trohman RG: Failure of an implantable left ventricular assist device: distinc-tive electrocardiographic pattern before malfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:1376–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knosalla C, Weng Y, Buz S, Loebe M, Hetzer R. Psuedoaneurysm of the outflow graft in a patient with Novacor 100 LVAD system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70: 1594–6.
   Google Scholar
• HeartMate VE LVAS Directions for Use (document# 25919). Woburn, MA: Thermo Cardiosystems Inc., 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner JL, Bourge RC, Kirklin JK, McGiffin DC, Holman VVL. Replacement of an intracorporeal left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:839–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner JL, Bourge RC, Shepard RB, Epstein AE, Holman VVL. Simultaneous use of an implanted defibrillator and ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:1156–8.
   Google Scholar
• Scheid HH, Soeparwata R, Schmid C, Loick M, Weyand M, Hammel D. Rupture of inflow conduits in the TCI-HeartMate system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:287–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonkohara Y, Minami K, Arusoglu L, et al. A fatal mechanical disorder of the TCI HeartMate left ventricular assist system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:769–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy PM, Smedira NO, Vargo RL, et al. One hundred Patients with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: evolv-ing concepts and technology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:904–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahania S, Onsager DR, Weigel TL, Canver CC, Love RB, Mentzer RM Jr. Diagnosis and successful treatment of a unique form of malfunction of the HeartMate left ventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:143–4.
   Google Scholar
• Morales DLS, Catanese KA, Heiman DN, et al. Six-year experi-ence of caring for forty-four patients with a left ventricular assist device at home: safe, economical, necessary. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:251–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose EA, Moskowitz AL Packer M, et al. The REMATCH trial: rationale, design, and end points. Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:723–30.
   Google Scholar
• BW Healthwire. Press release, Nov 26, 2001. New York: ABIO-MED receives FDA permission to continue AbioCor trial.
   Google Scholar
• Fox RC. Lessons from the heart: ethical reflections on the clini-cal trials of the Jarvik-7. In: Hetzer R, Hermig M, Loebe M (eds). Mechanical Circulatory Support. New York, NY: Springer, 1998, pp 207–8.
   Google Scholar
• AbioCor Clinical Trial Information. Available from: http:/ / www.abiomed.com/Fabiocor.html. Accessed Dec 11, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bramstedt KA. The use of advance directives and DNR orders in decision-making regarding inactivation of implantable car-dioverter-defibrillators in terminal patients. Cardiovasc Rev Rep. 2001;21:175–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bramstedt KA, Wenger NS. When the withdrawal of life sus-taining care does more than "allow death to take its course": the dilemma of left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:544–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramstedt KA. Informed consent documentation for total artifi-cial heart technology. J Artif Organs. 2001;4:273–7.
   Google Scholar