A Comparison of the King-LT to Endotracheal Intubation andCombitube in a Simulated Difficult Airway

References

• Davis D P, Valentine C, Ochs M, Vilke G M, Hoyt D B. The Combitube as a salvage airway device for paramedic rapid sequence intubation. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 42(5)697–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumball C J, MacDonald D. The PTL, Combitube, laryngeal mask, andoral airway: a randomized prehospital comparative study of ventilatory device effectiveness andcost-effectiveness in 470 cases of cardiorespiratory arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care 1997; 1(1)1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staudinger T, Brugger S, Watschinger B, Roggla M, Dielacher C, Lobl T, Fink D, Klauser R, Frass M. Emergency intubation with the Combitube: comparison with the endotracheal airway. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22(10)1573–5
   Google Scholar
• Ochs M, Vilke G M, Chan T C, Moats T, Buchanan J. Successful prehospital airway management by EMT-Ds using the combitube. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000; 4(4)333–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yardy N, Hancox D, Strang T. A comparison of two airway aids for emergency use by unskilled personnel. The Combitube andlaryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1999; 54(2)181–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumball C, Macdonald D, Barber P, Wong H, Smecher C. Endotracheal intubation andesophageal tracheal Combitube insertion by regular ambulance attendants: a comparative trial. Prehosp Emerg Care 2004; 8(1)15–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabitsch W, Schellongowski P, Staudinger T, Hofbauer R, Dufek V, Eder B, Raab H, et al. Comparison of a conventional tracheal airway with the Combitube in an urban emergency medical services system run by physicians. Resuscitation 2003; 57(1)27–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lefrancois D P, Dufour D G. Use of the esophageal tracheal combitube by basic emergency medical technicians. Resuscitation 2002; 52(1)77–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Administration USFaD. King-LT FDA Marketing Approval. 2003, In Rockville, MD, January 9
   Google Scholar
• Nolan J P, Deakin C D, Soar J, Bottiger B W, Smith G. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2005; 67: S39–86, (suppl 1)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genzwuerker H V, Hilker T, Hohner E, Kuhnert-Frey B. The laryngeal tube: a new adjunct for airway management. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000; 4(2)168–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genzwuerker H V, Vollmer T, Ellinger K. Fibreoptic tracheal intubation after placement of the laryngeal tube. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89(5)733–8
   Google Scholar
• Kurola J, Harve H, Kettunen T, Laakso J P, Gorski J, Paakkonen H, Silfvast T. Airway management in cardiac arrest–comparison of the laryngeal tube, tracheal intubation andbag-valve mask ventilation in emergency medical training. Resuscitation 2004; 61(2)149–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus J H, Arkava G., Bose T., Schwartz S., Ludwig R. Combitube D. dual-lumen esophageal airway device retention skills in deployed army combat medics. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 162a, (5 suppl 1)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus J P, Prouix D., Cain C A, Hill J. Combat G. trauma airway management: Combitube versus the King Laryngeal Tube device by army combat medic students. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 162, (5 suppl 1)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiah L, Wong E, Chen M F, Sadarangani S P. Should there be a change in the teaching of airway management in the medical school curriculum?. Resuscitation 2005; 64(1)87–91
   Google Scholar
• McManus J H, Ward G., Cain J., Parsons J., Prouix D. An C. observational study comparing the Combitube andthe King Laryngeal Tracheal device in combat trauma airway training for US Army combat medic students. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46: 46, (3 (supplement)
   Google Scholar
• Association A H. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation andEmergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 7.1. Adj Airway Control Ventil 2005; 112: 51–7
   Google Scholar
• Wang H E, Seitz S R, Hostler D, Yealy D M. Defining the learning curve for paramedic student endotracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2005; 9(2)156–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emergency Medicine Technician Paramedic: National Standard Curriculum (EMT-P): Clinical Rotations. 1998, http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/ems/EMT-P/disk_7%5B1%5D/index.htm Available at (Accessed August 16th, 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Association A H. Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary resuscitation andemergency cardiovascular care. Part 6. Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: Section 1: Introduction to ACLS 2000. Circulation 2000; I86–I9
   Google Scholar
• Burton J H, Baumann M R, Maoz T, Bradshaw J R, Lebrun J E. Endotracheal intubation in a rural EMS state: procedure utilization andimpact of skills maintenance guidelines. Prehosp Emerg Care 2003; 7(3)352–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H E, Kupas D F, Hostler D, Cooney R, Yealy D M, Lave J R. Procedural experience with out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation. Crit Care Med 2005; 33(8)1718–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H E, Yealy D M. Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation: where are we?. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 47(6)532–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz S H, Falk J L. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37(1)32–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J H, Murphy M P, Dickson R L, Somerville G G, Brizendine E J. Emergency physician-verified out-of-hospital intubation: miss rates by paramedics. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11(6)707–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestri S, Ralls G A, Krauss B, Thundiyil J, Rothrock S G, Senn A, Carter E, et al. The effectiveness of out-of-hospital use of continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring on the rate of unrecognized misplaced intubation within a regional emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45(5)497–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunford J V, Davis D P, Ochs M, Doney M, Hoyt D B. Incidence of transient hypoxia andpulse rate reactivity during paramedic rapid sequence intubation. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 42(6)721–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mort T C. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg 2004; 99(2)607–13, table of contents
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mort T C. The incidence andrisk factors for cardiac arrest during emergency tracheal intubation: a justification for incorporating the ASA Guidelines in the remote location. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16(7)508–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mort T C. Esophageal intubation with indirect clinical tests during emergency tracheal intubation: a report on patient morbidity. J Clin Anesth 2005; 17(4)255–62
   Google Scholar
• Kette F, Reffo I, Giordani G, Buzzi F, Borean V, Cimarosti R, Codiglia A, et al. The use of laryngeal tube by nurses in out-of-hospital emergencies: preliminary experience. Resuscitation 2005; 66(1)21–5
   Google Scholar
• Atherton G L, Johnson J C. Ability of paramedics to use the Combitube in prehospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22(8)1263–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertongen V M, Ramsay M P, Herbison P. Skills retention for insertion of the Combitube andlaryngeal mask airway. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2003; 15(5–6)459–64
   Google Scholar
• Asai T, Kawachi S. Use of the laryngeal tube by paramedic staff. Anaesthesia 2004; 59(4)408–9
   Google Scholar